search for: woudln't

Hi guys i've setup a virtual users setup with postfix and when i login to the mail with dovecot i'm not getting a trash or sent items folder I'm looking at the Maildir home and there's no .trash or .sent items there. Any ideas why dovecot woudln't create these? TIA Here's the dovecot.conf # /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf protocols = imap imaps log_timestamp = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S " first_valid_uid = 100 login_user=vmail mail_extra_groups = mail mail_debug = yes #d...

woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway. and i am not allowed to to give read rights do "any" (i.e. 755) but theres really no option in smb.conf like "read only users = " or something like that? Am 13.12.2011 17:56, schrieb Raffael Sahli: > On Tue, 13 Dec...

...nly made to let it work... And as compiling is quite difficult for new users, and annoying for a lot of people, if you would use a dll compiled by a patched wine, would it work by simply using this new dll? Then it would be nice to create a sort of repository where you can get a patched dll, so you woudln't have to compile it yourself... Also, would it be possible to create a sort of advanced configuration window concerning the graphics tab, where you could select a rendering method (fbo, pbuffer...) and set your memory? A simple suggestion, but imo it should not be in the main tab, but linked...

Robert MacGregor wrote: > I have some indispensable tools which I have not seen satisfying GPL > alternatives, which I've invested considerable amounts of $$$$, and > which are indispensable tools for me and I'd like to ping you all for > confirmation or other comments about getting the following apps to work > in WINE -- so I can finally make the jump to Linux as my

Skipped content of type multipart/related-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 2892 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030403/46e84bf5/smime.bin

Even if it were under llvm, that doesn't mean it would have to be part of ninja check-all. Currently we have lldb/test and lldb/unittests, what about a third lldb/dbgtests? Then you could run it as ninja check-dbgtest. Although now that I think about it, we would want it to be able to invoke clang-cl directly, so I guess that does necessitate it *not* being under llvm. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017