search for: worthwhile

where are the worthwhile markdown dingi? (dinguses?) i'm interested in any dingus that can take a "reasonable" amount of text -- let's say anything up to a megabyte -- and return the results in real-time, without a long wait... ideally it'd handle something more than gruber-minimum, and an a.p.i....

....robinson at sony.com> wrote: > Just to be clear - once LLVM has its own demangler, it should probably use > it on all platforms, so there'd be no worry about different behavior > between LLVM on Windows and LLVM elsewhere. > > But that said, it's probably still important/worthwhile to make sure it's > consistent with the platform demangler. > > > > Personally I would be all for a unit test program that verified against > the Windows API when run on Windows, and against canned output on > non-Windows. > That was my preference too, but looks like ge...

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Peter Moody <mindrot at hda3.com> wrote: > why not add the certificate to the running ssh-agent with a timeout > that expires when the cert does? That's an excellent idea. I've modified our tooling to do exactly that (https://github.com/continusec/geecert/commit/dfeee14b278e28d15bf532bb6e6e8ffe530e6b11). Thank you for the suggestion. > I

Hi, The back end of our functional compiler often generates sequential switch statements in LLVM typed assembly that scrutinize on the same expression. For example, in C syntax: #1 switch( e ) { case e2: { e3 } ... } switch( e ) { case e2: { e4 } ... } In this case, it would be nice if the second switch would be embedded in each arm of the first switch. Because the set

Hi all, We''ve installed RoR on Solaris 9, and are attempting to install Mongrel using the following command:gem install mongrelgetting error "SSL is not installed on this system".All other gems (including Rake) installed fine.Any suggestions?Thanks,Brian _________________________________________________________________ Boo!?Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try

Dunno whether it's worthwhile, but we definitely test for it, and if his two non-volatile loads were identical, we'd definitely eliminate them in GVN. On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Could you explain why you think it is worthwhile to optimize code involving &g...

On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:42 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > > I guess a case could be made for ssh-add to always set a timeout when > > adding a certificate with an expiry time, but I think for now I'm > > happy enough to do that on our end. > > That sounds like a fine idea. Damien, to clarify did

I would like the unlicense (http://unlicense.org/) added to R licenses. Does anyone else think that worthwhile? -- Charles Geyer Professor, School of Statistics Resident Fellow, Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science University of Minnesota charlie at stat.umn.edu

...ny.com<mailto:paul.robinson at sony.com>> wrote: Just to be clear - once LLVM has its own demangler, it should probably use it on all platforms, so there'd be no worry about different behavior between LLVM on Windows and LLVM elsewhere. But that said, it's probably still important/worthwhile to make sure it's consistent with the platform demangler. Personally I would be all for a unit test program that verified against the Windows API when run on Windows, and against canned output on non-Windows. That was my preference too, but looks like getting the exact same results as the Win...

As background, for one of my clients we built out a command line tool which does SSO with Google Apps, then generates a new SSH key pair, and sends this off to an internal service which verifies the request and then issues a new short lived (24 hour) certificate (if interested the code for the server and client is open-sourced here: https://github.com/continusec/geecert), overwriting the previous

...le.com> writes: > The other assumption here is that you want the same file format written by > instrumentation and read back by the compiler. While I think that is an > unsurprising goal, I think it creates quite a few limitations that I'd like to > point out. I think it would be worthwhile to consider the alternative of > having the profile library write out data files in a format which is > essentially "always" transformed by a post-processing tool before being used > during compilation. > > Limitations of using the same format in both places: > - High bu...

...l proposal and post it here. > > I missed the earlier discussion, so I'm sorry for chiming in late. > >> I propose to add the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro for specifying intended fall-through locations between switch cases. > > I don't really see that the tradeoff here is worthwhile. It is possible that we have some fallthrough bugs, but the cost of sprinkling this macro everywhere doesn't seem like the right tradeoff. > While I tend to agree with you, it's also true that for many (most?) of the locations where we have an intentional fall through, there's alr...

Damien Miller wrote: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 10:42 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: >>>> I guess a case could be made for ssh-add to always set a timeout when >>>> adding a certificate with an expiry time, but I think for now I'm

Hi there! I am considering to port a SAS application to R and I would like to hear your opinion if you think this is possible and worthwhile. SAS is mainly used to do data management and then to do some aggregations and simple computations on the data and to output a modified data set. The main problem I see is the size of the data file. As I have no access to SAS yet I cannot give real details but the SAS data file is about 7 gigabytes...

...ll which might be expensive, e.g.: X->foo() && isa<T>(X->foo()) =>> isa_or_null<T>(X->foo()) The implementation could be a simple wrapper around isa<>, and while the IR produced is only slightly more efficient, the elimination of an extra call could be worthwhile. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190404/cf573877/attachment.html>

...pick a specific mirror, such as > http://mirror.sfo12.us.leaseweb.net/centos/7/os/x86_64/ > (https://www.centos.org/download/mirrors/) Tried the one above and a lot of others replied to John, many others. This is one of those situation where accurate understandable documentation would be worthwhile. > Any URL where you see a "repodata" directory (assuming the correct arch > and release) should work as an additional repository (for EPEL and others). I'll save this tip for later. First I need to get the basic, *easy* (?) specification working.

Hello DTracers, The CPU caps project (http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/rm/rctls/cpu-caps/) introduces kernel "wait queues" where threads may be placed to enforce caps. I would like to make this visible through DTrace and to add two new probes to the sched provider with the following semantics: cpucaps-sleep Probe that fires immediately before the current thread is placed on a

...tart logging to logfile after showing Ctrl+C option? Suggestions are welcome on how to reply to this "feature". -- Luis Lavena Multimedia systems - Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price which all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile. Vince Lombardi

CPUIDLE: Avoid remnant LAPIC timer intr while force hpetbroadcast LAPIC will stop during C3, and resume to work after exit from C3. Considering below case: The LAPIC timer was programmed to expire after 1000us, but CPU enter C3 after 100us and exit C3 at 9xxus. 0us: reprogram_timer(1000us) 100us: entry C3, LAPIC timer stop 9xxus: exit C3 due to unexpected event, LAPIC timer continue running

...ote: >> >> Just to be clear - once LLVM has its own demangler, it should probably >> use it on all platforms, so there'd be no worry about different behavior >> between LLVM on Windows and LLVM elsewhere. >> >> But that said, it's probably still important/worthwhile to make sure it's >> consistent with the platform demangler. >> >> >> >> Personally I would be all for a unit test program that verified against >> the Windows API when run on Windows, and against canned output on >> non-Windows. >> >> >&...