search for: worrying

Red Hat AS 3 Samba 3.0.0 (from distro) openldap-2.0.27-11 smbldap-tools-0.8.2-1 nss_ldap-207-5 PDC and LDAP Master / BDC and LDAP slave errors in client logs - should I worry? something I can fix? client log A - Worry? Don't Worry? [2004/01/29 08:08:59, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:init_group_mapping(139) Failed to open group mapping database [2004/01/29 08:08:59, 0]

On Mar 16, 2005, at 12:01, Chris Lattner wrote: > It's not clear to me if pthreads will be required just by the > JIT-using-tools, or if it will be required by everything. If you have > thread-support stuff going into lib/Support, all llvm tools should be > linked to libpthread. Well, at the moment, I've added a mutex to ExecutionEngine. Thus, anything that pulls in this

Hi all, Will keep this brief :-) Just trying to clear some things up regarding winbind. wbinfo -u returns "Error looking up domain users". I'm only using winbind for ntlm_auth which works fine. I'm not using AD or any Windows server-based domain. Samba only. There don't seem to be any obvious errors in the winbind log. Do I need to worry about that error? Should it

...me optimizations because we worry about the register pressure, (e.g. GVNHoist and ArgumentPromotion). However, in the architecture that are register-rich, e.g. FPGAs, we do not need to worry about the register pressure at all. For these architecures, we may want to optimization the LLVM IR without worrying about the register pressure. I suggest that we introduce a hook in the TargetTransformInfo to tell if the current target architecture is register-rich or not. With this hook, we can enable the optimizations that increase register pressure in case the current architecture is register-rich. One pro...

Hi all, I checked out everything mentioned in GettingStarted at tags/RELEASE_370/final and ran `make -j4 check-all`. I got three test failures: libc++abi :: catch_array_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_function_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_member_function_pointer_01.pass.cpp Should I worry? Here are the failures as reported, with the LLVM source directory replaced with ... for

Hello, I have a question about ext3 write activity. I am considering using an ext3 fs on a CompactFlash disk for my data-logging application (power can disapear anytime). The quantity & frequency of the data logged itself is not a problem at all considering flash wear. But I'm a bit worried about the kernel/ext3 doing regular writes by itself even when there are no userspace writes.

I see the comment here about some 64bit combinations failing. Well, my configuration fails. Is this really something to worry about? for R-patched: fi1->cat SVN-REVISION Revision: 39576 Last Changed Date: 2006-10-03 fi1-> > ## failed for some 64bit-Lapack-gcc combinations: > sm <- cbind(1, 3:1, 1:3) > eigenok(sm, eigen(sm)) Error: abs(A %*% V - V %*% diag(lam)) < Eps is

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a const >> buffer. As such instead of sticking it into ->set_global_binding, >> you'd stick it into ->set_constant_buffer, and then

...ISDN card (fcpci/chan_capi) Four Grandstream BudgeTone 101 handsets It's a shared 100bT LAN with three PCs and a printer, no strenuous file copying etc. Network utilisation is very low. All the kit have 'real' IP addresses. Has anybody got any ideas what could possibly be causing this worrying problem? Cheers, Nick Barnes

Hi, On 22-02-16 17:13, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> But assuming I'm right, what I'm proposing is that instead of passing >>>> the input in as a global buffer, to instead pass it in as a

OEL 5, OCFS 1.4, using EMC Power Path for multi pathing. I want t mount the OCFS2 file system on the emc power path device. I can mount by UUID, and not have to worry about persistent bindings across nodes. But how do I make sure when it mounts by UUID , that the pwoer path device is used. Any help will be much appreciated. Thanks -- Sridhar Avantsa savantsa at gmail.com -------------- next

Hate to ask, but after reading the last few months of centos history online I am worried. And to learn the lead guy seems to have absconded with the cash and left all the hard working devs high and dry..well that is scary. They all worked so hard and who knows what will happen now. If centos falls I have no choice but to go to redhat. I am wondering if the conversion will be easy or a complete

Hi there, I've made a couple of small contributions to the wiki but recently I read the Terms of service, they are pretty draconian: LICENSE AND SITE ACCESS voip-info.org grants you a limited license to access and make personal use of this site. This license does not include any resale or commercial use of this site or its contents. Without express written consent of voip-info.org you may

Hi, I have a question: do I have to worry if I run with wine an executable that may contain a virus (I am running linux as a normal user, not root)? -- Peter Kostov, webdesigner, photographer Sofia, Bulgaria Home sites - www.webdesign.light-bg.com - www.light-bg.com

Hi, I'm new in LLVM project , I have to write a compiler frond-end (based on LLVM) in C++ to support my programming language .Am I have to implement support for each architecture or LLVM has libraries that can do this for me ? (btw I don't want to support architecture that LLVM don't) . does LLVM has helper functions to create objects in heap ? if not is it good idea to use C++11

...t could be user provided? I saw something in AWDWR about sanitize() - any comments/advice on that? One thing I''m considering is rendering it on the server side and providing an image of the rendered to the user - then I only have to worry about being compromised on my server instead of worrying about XSS attacks. Does that make sense? Any thoughts or advice is appreciated. Wes -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I''m running Xen 4.2.0 with Linux kernel 3.7.0 and I''m seeing a flood of these messages in xen dmesg: (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 -> ffff82c4802170e4 (XEN) traps.c:3156: GPF (0060): ffff82c480159247 ->

Patches item #4603, was opened at 2006-05-29 16:07 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=413&aid=4603&group_id=85 Category: win32-open3 Group: Bug Fix Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: John-Mason Shackelford (jpshackelford) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: [open3] set $? and return Process::Status with block call Initial

The virtual machine I'm implementing allocates objects on the heap using Boehm's garbage collector. I currently have an interpreter working for my language, and I'm working on a JIT that will compile some of the functions that would otherwise get interpreted. What I'm wondering is whether or not I need to perform special adjustments for the GC to work properly. My understanding is