search for: worrisomely

We finally seem to have worked most of the kinks out of our OCFS/RAC setup, and are running a mass import to clone our production database for testing. While this has been going on, I fired up ocfstool to check out the states of the various shared volumes. In several cases, I saw (in the File Listing tab) multiple entries for some directories and files at the filesystem root. The duplicate

Rsync people, Tell me if I'm wrong, but rsync seems to have a very serious race condition that would make it risky to transfer files into a directory writable by someone you don't trust if permissions are going to be granted to other people on those files. The rsync receiver creates a half-transferred file with 600 or 700 permissions; then the receiver writes the data and finalizes the

Hi guys, Sorry for the OT. For the last couple of weeks I notice that the static in my server room is worrisomely noticeable. I cannot see what may be causing it.... Care to share some of your experience what may be the cause and the remedy? Thank you.

While doing a browser fingerprinting survey, I was quite surprised to see I actually have a FireFox plugin installed. The culprit is /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin.so It appears that whoever maintains the rhythmbox RPM has chosen not to package the browser plugin separately like it probably should be. So if I have the rhythmbox RPM installed, I have the plugin.

Hi all, I''m getting some weird behavior. I''m developing on two machines, one with os x and the other with windows xp. I was testing one of my registration forms and it worked fine when mongrel_rails was run on the windows machine, but when mongrel was run on os x it kept throwing "ActionController::InvalidAuthenticityToken". I realized I had forgotten the <%=

On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > Perhaps you're instead trying to say that with certain address spaces "noalias" (and by inference, "restrict" at the language level) has a different semantic model than other address spaces? While it's less worrisome than the first interpretation, I still don't really

Recently upgraded my 3 dc's to samba 4.12.1 as part of the install ran dbcheck --cross-ncs on each dc after make install first dc dbcheck reported 5474 objectssecond dc reported 5476 objects last dc (the one with all the fsmo roles, etc.)? reported 1406 objects! now all of them report 1406 objects. (drs replication obviously) ADUC, DNS, GPO manager all seem to have the requisite data. I

On Nov 9, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >> >> Perhaps you're instead trying to say that with certain address spaces "noalias" (and by inference, "restrict" at the language level) has a different semantic model than other address

On 11/11/2013 03:13 PM, Andrew Trick wrote: > On Nov 9, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Nov 9, 2013, at 3:14 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> >>> Perhaps you're instead trying to say that with certain address spaces "noalias" (and by inference, "restrict" at the language

...rnel vmlinuz-3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64, among many other things. When I rebooted, I was asked to confirm (or renew, or some such) my license. My LICENSE ??? I was booting in text mode and the actions required were a) unfamiliar, and b) hard to understand. As I recall, I had to read the EULA - a worrisomely Microsoftian demand - and accept it. Of course, the terms were pretty benign. Then I had to continue. I can't remember the exact language. Of course, now when I reboot, all this cruft is gone. Is this a cute April Fool joke? If not, WTF is going on? -- David A. De Graaf DATIX,...

So, I don't have a horse in the OpenCL race, and I'd like to mostly keep it that way, but I want to point out that some of these things have much broader implications. On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > I don’t think think outright disallowing this transform is the right > solution. This would be valid for OpenCL private or

On 12/10/2016 07:51, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Please make your patch, if possible, viahttps://github.com/dovecot/core > as pull request. I am not really git "schooled", but I shall look into that. Many Thanks for being open to a "non-gcc" compiler! Michael

On 09/20/2016 03:54 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > All of us are having trouble with the "Anniversary update" to W10 > Version 1607. If you can roll back to previous Version 15?? (sorry can't > remember) that MIGHT correct your issue. No promises. It's definitely that update that caused the problem.

> Hello wineusers, devs and all other people, > Hello. [...] > Well, every time before the window "please insert disc..." pops up, wine > gives the following error on console: > > fixme:ole:ITypeInfo_fnRelease destroy child objects > err:seh:setup_exception nested exception on signal stack in thread 0009 > eip 7ffd7ff0 esp 7fe95cfc stack 0x7f900000-0x7fa00000

So... I upgraded via RPMs (actually, I uninstalled 2.2.7, and then installed 2.2.8 because of the dependencies... Is there a better method to upgrading?) this past weekend. Monday, end of the day, the entire machine crashed. No unusual circumstances, it sits there acting as a PDC on a Mandrake 7.2 Pentium 200 with 40MB of ram with not much else going on. Suddenly the whole machine locks up,

After a lot of testing and help from Duncan, Benjamin, Joerg and others, I think the new SROA is ready for some broader testing. I've fixed all the crashers and miscompiles that Duncan and Joerg have been able to find (although I'm sure there are a few left I'll tackle when there are reports), and the LNT numbers look *really* good. Here is the latest LNT run we got by flipping it on

I have data consisting of binary responses from a large number of subjects on seven similar items. I have been using lmer with (crossed) random effects for subject and item. These effects are almost always (in the case of subject, always) significant additions to the model, testing this with anova. Including them also increases the Somers' Dxy value substantially. Even without those

On 09/20/2016 04:09 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: > On 2016-09-20 15:00, James Knott via samba wrote: > >> On 09/20/2016 03:54 PM, Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba wrote: >> >>> All of us are having trouble with the "Anniversary update" to W10 >>> Version 1607. If you can roll back to previous Version 15?? (sorry can't >>>

hi, i am trying to compile a fixed point version of lipspeex on desktop windows environment. a short reason for the complicated story is that we need to keep the 'engine' part of our project same across the various ports of our voip project (blame the pointy haired boss). now, when i compile with FIXED_POINT defined in the Visual C++ 6.0, i get these errors:

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > Even with C code, we place a null string in a writable > section, which isn't correct. You could say that, but it's not really wrong... say you had a 10 kilobyte struct that was all null. If you put it into a data section, it takes up 10k in the executable (unless Darwin has some unusual data