search for: workings

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:40:58PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> > > Add some kind of vblank workers. The interface is similar to regular > delayed works, and also allows for re-scheduling. > > Whatever hardware programming we do in the work must be fast > (must at least complete during the vblank, sometimes during

From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> Add some kind of vblank workers. The interface is similar to regular delayed works, and also allows for re-scheduling. Whatever hardware programming we do in the work must be fast (must at least complete during the vblank, sometimes during the first few scanlines of vblank), so we'll fire up a per-crtc high priority thread for

Hi! I''m new in ruby/rails programming and i have a small problem. I have installed InstantRails 1.0 (for Ruby/Rails/Mysql/Apache envs) and I''m trying to make a small app working. I''m using auth_generator for making a login page/users admin pages... and I have a problem when trying to CHANGE the avatar for the user. I have the following error: MissingSourceFile

Add some kind of vblank workers. The interface is similar to regular delayed works, and is mostly based off kthread_work. It allows for scheduling delayed works that execute once a particular vblank sequence has passed. It also allows for accurate flushing of scheduled vblank works - in that flushing waits for both the vblank sequence and job execution to complete, or for the work to get cancelled

Oops, completely forgot to link to the work_struct version of this patch: [1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/-/commit/f57886aebbd9631f1ee6e61b516bf73afbfe74f4 On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:29 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Adding Tejun to this thread per-Daniel's suggestion on IRC. > > Hi Tejun! So, I don't know what your experience with modesetting related > stuff >

Add some kind of vblank workers. The interface is similar to regular delayed works, and is mostly based off kthread_work. It allows for scheduling delayed works that execute once a particular vblank sequence has passed. It also allows for accurate flushing of scheduled vblank works - in that flushing waits for both the vblank sequence and job execution to complete, or for the work to get cancelled

Adding Tejun to this thread per-Daniel's suggestion on IRC. Hi Tejun! So, I don't know what your experience with modesetting related stuff is so I'll quickly explain some important concepts here regarding scanlines, vblanks, etc. If you already understand this, feel free to skip this next paragraph. >From the perspective of a computer, every time a computer monitor displays a new

We used to implement the work flushing through tracking queued seq, done seq, and the number of flushing. This patch simplify this by just implement work flushing through another kind of vhost work with completion. This will be used by lockless enqueuing patch. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 53

We used to implement the work flushing through tracking queued seq, done seq, and the number of flushing. This patch simplify this by just implement work flushing through another kind of vhost work with completion. This will be used by lockless enqueuing patch. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 53

Hi Tejun! Sorry to bother you, but have you had a chance to look at any of this yet? Would like to continue moving this forward On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 16:38 -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Oops, completely forgot to link to the work_struct version of this patch: > > [1] > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lyudess/linux/-/commit/f57886aebbd9631f1ee6e61b516bf73afbfe74f4 > > On Fri,

I had llvm 2.9 installed on ununtu. I tried to build clang but got following error. I have llvm 2.9 and clang is latest version ( I don't know, I got from svn). I am wondering is it because of version problem ? Does clang work with 2.9 llvm ? llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Debug build In file included from

mingw, llvm 2.6 (buid with llvm-gcc) Example source code: http://npcontemplation.blogspot.com/2008/06/secret-of-llvm-c-bindings.html I change LLVMCreateJITCompiler(&engine, provider, &error); to LLVMCreateJITCompiler(&engine, provider, 3, &error); $ llvm-gcc `llvm-config --cflags` -c fac.c $ g++ `llvm-config --libs --cflags --ldflags core analysis executionengine jit

I get these errors when running winex on paltalk.exe, what can I do? Building font metrics. This may take some time... fixme:font:LFD_InitFontInfo DBCS fonts like '-default-kai-medium-r-normal--8-80-72-72-c-80-big5-0' are not working correctly now. fixme:font:LFD_InitFontInfo DBCS fonts like '-default-kai-medium-r-normal--8-80-72-72-c-80-gb2312.1980-0' are not working correctly

I saw WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->work_list)) trigger so our custom flush is not as airtight as need be. This patch switches to a simple atomic counter + srcu instead of the custom locked queue + flush implementation. This will slow down the setup ioctls, which should not matter - it's slow path anyway. We use the expedited flush to at least make sure it has a sane time bound. Works

I saw WARN_ON(!list_empty(&dev->work_list)) trigger so our custom flush is not as airtight as need be. This patch switches to a simple atomic counter + srcu instead of the custom locked queue + flush implementation. This will slow down the setup ioctls, which should not matter - it's slow path anyway. We use the expedited flush to at least make sure it has a sane time bound. Works

Currently, it's only possible to flush on a kthread_work in contexts where it's possible to block. This can be kind of painful though when trying to implement new types of delayed work which use kthread_work, since it means we'd need to drop any spinlocks for new delayed work implementations before we can actually call kthread_flush_work(). In the time between dropping locks and

At a number of sites we are using Windows 2000 Server SP4 (APPSERVER) as a Terminal Server and a PDC. All user areas are stored on a NetBSD 1.6.2 server with Samba 3.0.7 using security = domain and a named password server. We've joined the domain from the Samba box (domain DOMAINNAME). In general everything works fine, but when a number of clients log on at around the same time (say 25 users

hello spec''ers, i''m in the hunt for guides on testing controllers with rspec, would you guys recommend any? thanks Oliver -- Oliver Azevedo Barnes oli.azevedo.barnes at gmail.com +55 11 9768 0193 http://www.linkedin.com/in/oliverbarnes http://workingwithrails.com/person/4704-oliver-barnes

I am running the following llvm-ld command to produce native code: llvm-ld -native -o code.exe code.bc -lm However, I am getting the following assertion failure in llc. The bytecode has been processed with opt, it passes opt bytecode verification. I'm not too familiar with backend code generation. Does anyone have any insight in to what the problem might be or how to go about

Hi all i''m using link_to_remote to render different sets of text-input fields. i''m setting up links in a sidebar to do this so, in my _sidebar.rhtml i have <%= SidebarItem(''catalogue'') %> this works...(in works.helper.rb) def SidebarItem(name) link_to_remote "#{name}", :update => ''EditFields'',