Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "work_resch".
Did you mean:
work_resched
2005 Jan 14
1
xen-unstable dom0/1 smp schedule while atomic
...iated an scp from dom0 to another remote host (not dom1) Ill only post the
first and last few "scheduling while atomic" entries, let me know if someone
wants the whole
trace.
scheduling while atomic
[schedule+1682/1696] schedule+0x692/0x6a0
[sys_read+126/128] sys_read+0x7e/0x80
[work_resched+5/47] work_resched+0x5/0x2f
scheduling while atomic
[schedule+1682/1696] schedule+0x692/0x6a0
[sys_read+126/128] sys_read+0x7e/0x80
[work_resched+5/47] work_resched+0x5/0x2f
scheduling while atomic
[schedule+1682/1696] schedule+0x692/0x6a0
[do_softirq+155/160] do_softirq+0x9b/0xa0
[...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/2] Transparent entry.S IRQ holdoff handling
...on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET16
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -319,7 +318,7 @@ work_pending:
jz work_notifysig
work_resched:
call schedule
- cli # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
+ CLI # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
# setting need_resched or sigpending
# between sampling and the iret
movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx
@@ -369,7 +368,7 @@ syscall_trace_entry:
syscall_exit_work:
test...
2007 Apr 18
1
[PATCH 1/2] Transparent entry.S IRQ holdoff handling
...on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET16
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -319,7 +318,7 @@ work_pending:
jz work_notifysig
work_resched:
call schedule
- cli # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
+ CLI # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
# setting need_resched or sigpending
# between sampling and the iret
movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx
@@ -369,7 +368,7 @@ syscall_trace_entry:
syscall_exit_work:
test...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 8/24] i386 Vmi syscall assembly
...r on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ work_pending:
jz work_notifysig
work_resched:
call schedule
- cli # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
+ CLI # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
# setting need_resched or sigpending
# between sampling and the iret
movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ syscall_trace_entry:
syscall_exit_work:
test...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC, PATCH 8/24] i386 Vmi syscall assembly
...r on top,
* and a switch16 pointer on top of the current frame. */
call setup_x86_bogus_stack
RESTORE_REGS
lss 20+4(%esp), %esp # switch to 16bit stack
-1: iret
+1: IRET
.section __ex_table,"a"
.align 4
.long 1b,iret_exc
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ work_pending:
jz work_notifysig
work_resched:
call schedule
- cli # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
+ CLI # make sure we don't miss an interrupt
# setting need_resched or sigpending
# between sampling and the iret
movl TI_flags(%ebp), %ecx
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ syscall_trace_entry:
syscall_exit_work:
test...
2003 Aug 06
2
Re: ext3 badness in 2.6.0-test2
...7818>] nfsd_dispatch+0xe8/0x1f5
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c01d7730>] nfsd_dispatch+0x0/0x1f5
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c03b8120>] svc_process+0x480/0x64c
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c01d747b>] nfsd+0x26b/0x520
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c010b356>] work_resched+0x5/0x16
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c01d7210>] nfsd+0x0/0x520
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c01d7210>] nfsd+0x0/0x520
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: [<c0108e35>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0x10
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel:
Aug 6 15:22:05 adams kernel: Code: 8b 37 c7 44...
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
8
[patch 0/8] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
The main change from the last posting is that all the page-table
related patches have been moved out, and will be posted separately.
Also, the off-by-one in reserving the top of address space has been
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all,
I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and
other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're
getting somewhere.
These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the
VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0,
and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The
third patch is
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/3] Paravirtualization: Kernel Ring Cleanups
Hi all,
I've been looking at finding common ground between the VMI, Xen and
other paravirtualization approaches, and after some discussion, we're
getting somewhere.
These first two patches are the fundamentals, stolen mainly from the
VMI patches: removing assumptions about the kernel running in ring 0,
and macro-izing all the obvious para-virtualize-needing insns. The
third patch is
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
15
[PATCH 0 of 13] Basic infrastructure patches for a paravirtualized kernel
[ REPOST: Apologies to anyone who has seen this before. It
didn't make it onto any of the lists it should have. -J ]
Hi Andrew,
This series of patches lays the basic ground work for the
paravirtualized kernel patches coming later on. I think this lot is
ready for the rough-and-tumble world of the -mm tree.
For the most part, these patches do nothing or very little. The
patches should
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH 1/2] paravirt.h header
OK, this is the revised paravirt.h (Andi has seen this before), then the
second is the binary patching stuff. More things get added to the
paravirt struct in future patches, but this basic stuff hasn't changed
for some time.
====
This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized
instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently
these are function
2007 Apr 18
8
[PATCH 0/7] x86 paravirtualization infrastructure
The following patches introduce the core infrastructure needed to
paravirtualize the 32-bit x86 Linux kernel. This is done by moving
virtualization sensitive insn's or code paths to a function table,
paravirt_ops. This structure can be populated with hypervisor specific
calls or native stubs and currently support running on bare metal, VMI,
Xen, or Lhype. These patches apply to
2007 Apr 18
8
[PATCH 0/7] x86 paravirtualization infrastructure
The following patches introduce the core infrastructure needed to
paravirtualize the 32-bit x86 Linux kernel. This is done by moving
virtualization sensitive insn's or code paths to a function table,
paravirt_ops. This structure can be populated with hypervisor specific
calls or native stubs and currently support running on bare metal, VMI,
Xen, or Lhype. These patches apply to
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
33
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides
the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware,
paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system
to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor.
Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor
are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths