search for: wordsmiths

Hi, Given David's comments about an echo-chamber, I thought I might as well throw my oar in and say I'm strongly in favour of this. I'm not particularly fussed on the wordsmithing or the verbosity. In fact one of the (unfortunate) primary uses of this document surely will be as reference when a misbehavior occurs, so spelling at least some things out in full might be useful in that

Folks, I've created a few bugzilla issues with details of some of the things I'll be looking into. I'm not yet done wordsmithing the overall design document. I'll try to finish it by early next week at the latest. In the meantime, these are the specific bugzilla issues I've opened: 22716 <http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22716>librarieGlobal A dnovillo at

> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote: > > I've created a few bugzilla issues with details of some of the things I'll be looking into. I'm not yet done wordsmithing the overall design document.

...protocol 1 (x86_32-abi) "ip address" in DomU: lo and eth0 are present. eth0 doesn''t have an ip. Any information is appreciated. Thanks in advance. Regards, - Tommy _________________________________________________________________ Want to read Hotmail messages in Outlook? The Wordsmiths show you how. http://windowslive.com/connect/post/wedowindowslive.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!20EE04FBC541789!167.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_092008 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. rbowen pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from 65c4c21 Update meeting calendars. add 67e573d wordsmith calendar page No new revisions were added by this update. Summary of changes: community/calendar.md | 8 +++++--- community/irc-meetings.ical | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 7

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. rbowen pushed a change to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. from 67e573d wordsmith calendar page add d9b2e08 Add git link to footer No new revisions were added by this update. Summary of changes: _includes/footer.html | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) -- To stop receiving

I have a linux box on my home network and it also has xp and win viata on the same network. It is all friendly - how do I drop the need for Id/pw (if I can't, how do I set the id/pw so what I type in win vista gets passed to samba cleanly and thus I get in. I have tried many things in smb.conf and cannot figure it out TIA, Joe

On 03/10/2015 10:14 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com > <mailto:bob.wilson at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com >> <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM,

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 13 October 2015 at 18:59, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> We have *not* appointed any such committee at this point. >> (...) >> The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to >>

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > > Diego and I have discussed this according to the feedback received. We > have revised plan for this (see Diego's last reply). Here is a more > detailed re-cap: > > 1) keep MD_prof definition as it is today; also keep using the > frequency propagation as it is (assuming programs

Ok, replying anew now that I understand why reasoning about abstract locations for each object doesn't work. The general idea of describing a set of load and stores which belong to a particular invariant group seems reasonable. I've got some questions/comments on the specifics, but the overall direction seems entirely workable for the specific problem you're trying to solve.

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Chris > Lattner via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2016 4:36 PM > To: Renato Golin > Cc: llvm-dev > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM > code of conduct > > On May 5, 2016, at 4:02 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at

When erroring out about duplicated parameters, say "more than once" instead of "twice", since there can be more than two repeated parameters. Thanks to: Xiaodai Wang --- generator/fish.ml | 2 +- generator/perl.ml | 2 +- resize/resize.ml | 4 ++-- tools/virt-tar | 4 ++-- v2v/input_libvirt_vddk.ml | 2 +- v2v/output_rhv_upload.ml | 4 ++--

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:04 PM Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, May 6, 2016, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2016 at 19:34, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>

We (Google) have started to look more closely at the profiling infrastructure in LLVM. Internally, we have a large dependency on PGO to get peak performance in generated code. Some of the dependencies we have on profiling are still not present in LLVM (e.g., the inliner) but we will still need to incorporate changes to support our work on these optimizations. Some of the changes may be addressed

Hi folks, this summer I will work with Richard Smith on clang devirtualization. Check out our proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1f2SGa4TIPuBGm6y6YO768GrQsA8awNfGEJSBFukLhYA/edit?usp=sharing And modified LangRef http://reviews.llvm.org/D11399 You can also check out previous disscussion that was started before our proposal was ready -

Hi Ulrich, Thank you for looking at this. Apologies again for taking unjustifiably long to get back to you. This is really good stuff and I very much want to see this go in. I like it enough I’m going to try to talk you into doing even more work on improving this code. ;) Fair warning up front: You’re digging into some pretty fundamental problems in how the assemblers and code generators like to

Hi Everyone, I’d like to start a discussion about how to improve some important issues we have in the LLVM community, regarding our license and patent policy. Before we get started, I’d like to emphasize that *this is an RFC*, intended for discussion. There is no time pressure to do something fast here -- we want to do the right long-term thing for the community (though we also don’t want

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and