search for: wordsize

I checked the capabilities. I do not know why the guest is only for vbox. <guest> <os_type>hvm</os_type> <arch name='i686'> <wordsize>32</wordsize> <domain type='vbox'> </domain> </arch> </guest> I want it run qemu-kvm. and when i run virsh define /etc/libvirt/qemu/demo.xml. It shows error: Failed to define domain from /etc/libvirt/qemu/demo.xml error: unknown OS type hv...

Hello Community, I successfully installed and run xen (xm list and xm info can output appropriately). However, while I was installing domU image by using virt-install -p at domU OS. I encountered an error information" Host does not support virtualization type ''xen'' ". I built xen from source. Some of my friends have the same issue, but if they use pre-build xen, the

...es> <live/> <uri_transports> <uri_transport>xenmigr</uri_transport> </uri_transports> </migration_features> </host> <guest> <os_type>xen</os_type> <arch name="x86_64"> <wordsize>64</wordsize> <domain type="xen"></domain> </arch> <features> </features> </guest> <guest> <os_type>xen</os_type> <arch name="i686"> <wordsize>32</wordsize>...

...ne</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> <secmodel> <model>dac</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> </host> <guest> <os_type>hvm</os_type> <arch name='i686'> <wordsize>32</wordsize> <emulator>/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm</emulator> <machine>rhel6.5.0</machine> <machine canonical='rhel6.5.0'>pc</machine> <machine>rhel6.4.0</machine> <machine>rhel6.3.0</machine>...

...ne</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> <secmodel> <model>dac</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> </host> <guest> <os_type>hvm</os_type> <arch name='i686'> <wordsize>32</wordsize> <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> <machine>pc-1.2</machine> <machine canonical='pc-1.2'>pc</machine> <machine>pc-1.1</machine> <machine>pc-1.0</machine> <...

...; </cell> </cells> </topology> <secmodel> <model>none</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> </host> <guest> <os_type>exe</os_type> <arch name='x86_64'> <wordsize>64</wordsize> <emulator>/usr/local/libexec/libvirt_lxc</emulator> <domain type='lxc'> </domain> </arch> </guest> <guest> <os_type>exe</os_type> <arch name='i686'> <wordsi...

...ux</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> <secmodel> <model>dac</model> <doi>0</doi> </secmodel> </host> <guest> <os_type>hvm</os_type> <arch name='i686'> <wordsize>32</wordsize> <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-i386</emulator> <machine canonical='pc-i440fx-1.6' maxCpus='255'>pc</machine> <machine maxCpus='255'>pc-q35-1.4</machine> <machine maxCpus='255'>pc...

...t;qianfeng04161001@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I checked the capabilities. I do not know why the guest is only for >>> vbox. >>> <guest> >>> <os_type>hvm</os_type> >>> <arch name='i686'> >>> <wordsize>32</wordsize> >>> <domain type='vbox'> >>> </domain> >>> </arch> >>> </guest> >>> >>> I want it run qemu-kvm. and when i run virsh define >>> /etc/libvirt/qemu/demo.xml. It show...

...gust 25, 2013 10:20:03 PM > | Subject: [libvirt-users] The error for creating a new vm for kvm > | > | I checked the capabilities. I do not know why the guest is only for vbox. > | <guest> > | <os_type>hvm</os_type> > | <arch name='i686'> > | <wordsize>32</wordsize> > | <domain type='vbox'> > | </domain> > | </arch> > | </guest> > | > | I want it run qemu-kvm. and when i run virsh define > | /etc/libvirt/qemu/demo.xml. It shows error: Failed to define domain from > | /etc/libvirt/qe...

I'm trying to reason about how to find certain bit positions of the absolute value of a given integer value. Specifically, I want to know the highest possibly set bit and lowest possibly set bit of the absolute value, in order to find the range between the two. Note that I'm specifically trying to be as conservative as possible. This is what I have so far: If the sign bit of the

...<doi>0</doi> <baselabel type='kvm'>+0:+0</baselabel> <baselabel type='qemu'>+0:+0</baselabel> </secmodel> </host> <guest> <os_type>hvm</os_type> <arch name='ppc'> <wordsize>32</wordsize> <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc</emulator> <machine maxCpus='1'>g3beige</machine> <machine maxCpus='32'>ppce500</machine> <machine maxCpus='1'>mac99</machine> <machine...

Hi, Please let me know in case I am posting my question to the wrong forum. I apologize if that is the case! Here is my question: We run CentOS 6.3 on a server with dual Xeon CPU's. Our "dual blade" server uses this motherboard: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRT-HF.cfm We have two of these CPUs installed and working: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 6:26 PM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote: > This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the protocol. This is fine, although it's usually better to submit patches to llvm-commits. > Added mechanism to generate switch table in a data section > rather than having it interleaved with the code. > This is controlled by command

.... > > That strikes me as surprising. Is there some mutual exclusion that > prevents writes from occuring wherever a READ_ONCE() happens to a PTE? See for example mm/memory.c handle_pte_fault. ---snip---- /* * some architectures can have larger ptes than wordsize, * e.g.ppc44x-defconfig has CONFIG_PTE_64BIT=y and * CONFIG_32BIT=y, so READ_ONCE or ACCESS_ONCE cannot guarantee * atomic accesses. The code below just needs a consistent * view for the ifs and we later double check anyway with t...

1. Large 1 MB I/O, all reads and write to file systems 1MB (can use setvbuf to do this with out coding) e.g a awk programme doing 8K I/O to read 2GB file took 16 min, a perl programme doing 1MB I/O took 16 seconds. 2. When doing rsync -a /dir1/dir2 /dir3/dir4 Do not use pipe's, as they only read/write 5k at a time this is extremly slow, check it out with Solaris truss. Use sockets with

...and divisor in %o0 and %o1 respectively. + * + * m4 parameters: + * NAME name of function to generate + * OP OP=div => %o0 / %o1; OP=rem => %o0 % %o1 + * S S=true => signed; S=false => unsigned + * + * Algorithm parameters: + * N how many bits per iteration we try to get (4) + * WORDSIZE total number of bits (32) + * + * Derived constants: + * TWOSUPN 2^N, for label generation (m4 exponentiation currently broken) + * TOPBITS number of bits in the top `decade' of a number + * + * Important variables: + * Q the partial quotient under development (initially 0) + * R the rema...

On 11/25/2016 05:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 04:10:04PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 04:21:39PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>> What are use cases for such primitive that won't be OK with "read once >>> _and_ atomically"? >> >> I have none to hand. > > Whatever triggers the

On 11/25/2016 05:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 04:10:04PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 04:21:39PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >>> What are use cases for such primitive that won't be OK with "read once >>> _and_ atomically"? >> >> I have none to hand. > > Whatever triggers the

On 28 August 2015 at 18:02, Jason Kim <jasonk at codeaurora.org> wrote: > IMO having to disable 2/3 of the tests means the patch isn't ready yet. Dan is absolutely right. > (*) The tests weren’t all stable to begin with. That's not a reason to break them more. If you can't prove they're correct, you can't prove you broken them more, especially on other arches.

Hi: This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the protocol. Attached is a patch for the llc ARM backend: Added mechanism to generate switch table in a data section rather than having it interleaved with the code. This is controlled by command line flags and off by default. Also, tried to document and improve the code where I modified it. Robert -------------- next part