search for: wordlength

I want to fit a fairly long main title for a plot, supposedly by changing row after a while. As for now it starts way outside the picture margin at the left and continues way out right passed the right margins. >plot(A,main="This is my really long title and it's so long that I can see just about half of it.") Any suggestions? Shouldn't be that hard. -- View this message in

...Corpus, removePunctuation)> myCorpus <- tm_map(myCorpus, removeWords, stopwords("english"))> myCorpus <- tm_map(myCorpus, removeWords, stopwords("SMART"))> myCorpus <- tm_map(myCorpus, stripWhitespace)> myDtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(myCorpus, control = list(wordLengths = c(1,Inf))) Everything works fine upto this stage, if I do not include tokenizing. However, when I run the code with the following alteration:> dictCorpus <- myCorpus> myDtm <- DocumentTermMatrix(myCorpus, control = list(wordlengths=c(1,Inf),tokenize=NGramTokenizer, dictionary=dictCor...

...epends on the integer length, hence my interest in the exact definiton of integer. I'm interested in lifetime because I believe those bytes are associated with the stream and become invalid when the stream is freed; furthermore, I probably need to copy them into a buffer that is padded to full wordlength. This means I allocate the buffer whose address is returned to the core R RNG machinery. Eventually somebody needs to free the memory. Far more of my rsprng adventures are on http://wiki.r-project.org/rwiki/doku.php?id=packages:cran:rsprng. Feel free to read, correct, or extend it. Thanks. Ro...

Dear useRs, I have used using the excellent mgcv package (version 1.7-12) to create a generalized additive model (gam) including random effects - represented with s(...,bs="re") - on the basis of dialect data. My model contains two random-effect factors (Word and Key - the latter representing a speaker) and I have added both random intercepts and various random slopes for these

...The waveform reproduction is less accurate as > measured by a sample by sample comparison. In the test programs, the SNR is > 11.10 in the C55x and C54x, and 10.79 in the C6x build. I figured that the > encoders might not produce bit-exact results because of differences in their > wordlengths, but at one time they were the same (1.1.8, I think). The > decoders do produce the same results. Do you think that this is anything to > be worried about? Yes, it worries me a bit. Not the fact that the SNR are slightly different (one file is probably not enough to say which is "b...

...0 Rate: 9600 11 0.00001648 SUCCESS 12 0.00000000 apcsmart.exe IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_RTS Serial0 12 0.00001006 SUCCESS 13 0.00000000 apcsmart.exe IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_DTR Serial0 13 0.00001034 SUCCESS 14 0.00000000 apcsmart.exe IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_LINE_CONTROL Serial0 StopBits: 1 Parity: NONE WordLength: 8 14 0.00000922 SUCCESS 15 0.00000000 apcsmart.exe IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_CHAR Serial0 EOF:0 ERR:0 BRK:0 EVT:0 XON:11 XOFF:13 15 0.00000670 SUCCESS 16 0.00000000 apcsmart.exe IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_HANDFLOW Serial0 Shake:80000001 Replace:80000040 XonLimit:2048 XoffLimit:512 16 0.00001034 SUCCES...

Hello, I have the following problem with ssh on Solaris 10, 64bitx86 systems: bash-3.00# ssh -v admin at 172.20.11.244 OpenSSH_3.5p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090704f debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be trusted. debug1: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to 172.20.11.244 [172.20.11.244] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity

> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be > doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As > it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May > (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken. Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)

...gt; as >> measured by a sample by sample comparison. In the test programs, the SNR >> is >> 11.10 in the C55x and C54x, and 10.79 in the C6x build. I figured that >> the >> encoders might not produce bit-exact results because of differences in >> their >> wordlengths, but at one time they were the same (1.1.8, I think). The >> decoders do produce the same results. Do you think that this is anything >> to >> be worried about? > > Yes, it worries me a bit. Not the fact that the SNR are slightly > different (one file is probably not e...

...as >> measured by a sample by sample comparison. In the test programs, the SNR >> is >> 11.10 in the C55x and C54x, and 10.79 in the C6x build. I figured that >> the >> encoders might not produce bit-exact results because of differences in >> their >> wordlengths, but at one time they were the same (1.1.8, I think). The >> decoders do produce the same results. Do you think that this is anything >> to >> be worried about? > > Yes, it worries me a bit. Not the fact that the SNR are slightly > different (one file is probably not...

You can use regular expressions. ?regex and/or the stringr package are good places to start. Of course, you have to define "stop words." Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:40

...the C55x and C54x. The waveform reproduction is less accurate as measured by a sample by sample comparison. In the test programs, the SNR is 11.10 in the C55x and C54x, and 10.79 in the C6x build. I figured that the encoders might not produce bit-exact results because of differences in their wordlengths, but at one time they were the same (1.1.8, I think). The decoders do produce the same results. Do you think that this is anything to be worried about? Finally, in the simulator I measured the peak MIPs for the C55x as 29.4, where it was 41.5 in Speex 1.1.8. I was expecting some improvement...

Hi all, Is there a way in R to count the number of stop words (English) of a string using tm package? str="Mhm . Alright . There's um a young boy that's getting a cookie jar . And it he's uh in bad shape because uh the thing is falling over . And in the picture the mother is washing dishes and doesn't see it . And so is the the water is overflowing in the sink . And the