search for: wordfreq

...) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/stepanov_vector: -171.51% (0.8280 => 2.2481) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib: -43.51% (0.5240 => 0.7520) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/stepanov_container: -110.33% (1.0080 => 2.1201) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq: -43.20% (0.5000 => 0.7160) > multisource/Applications/hbd/hbd: -31.91% (1.7801 => 2.3481) > multisource/Applications/kimwitu++/kc: -18.78% (32.6580 => 38.7903) > multisource/Applications/minisat/minisat: -72.05% (1.2160 => 2.0921) > multisource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p: -...

...Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary3 | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ary2 | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/random | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/strcat | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile | * | * | SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello...

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0111 3584 0.0110 * 0.0103 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq | 0.2529 24524 0.0968 * 0.0538 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann | 0.0046 1336 0.0093 * 0.0091...

...0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0080 2176 0.0040 * 0.0040 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.03 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq | 0.1680 23120 0.1280 * 0.0640 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann | 0.0080 1384 0.0080 * 0.0120...

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0075 2124 0.0093 * 0.0067 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq | 0.2044 23324 0.1101 * 0.0451 | 0.01 0.01 0.01 * 0.07 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann | 0.0039 1376 0.0077 * 0.0081...

...0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc | 0.0044 3616 0.0053 * 0.0052 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq | 0.0902 26332 0.0541 * 0.0190 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann | 0.0022 1364 0.0044 * 0.0044...

...| -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc                                  | > 0.0599 11144    0.0400      *                0.0500      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.05 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq                            | > 0.1000 18728    0.0900      *                0.0500      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.01 *           0.07 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ackermann                               | > 0.0100 1192     0.0100      *            ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ > wc | 0.0599 11144 0.0400 > * 0.0500 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.05 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/ > wordfreq | 0.1000 18728 0.0900 > * 0.0500 | 0.00 0.00 0.01 * > 0.07 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/ > ackermann | 0.0100 1192 > 0.0100...

...05 0.0614 0.0003 > External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.External%2FSPEC%2FCFP2006%2F447_dealII%2F447_dealII.compile=on> > 1.48% 139.9167 141.9845 0.1678 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/simple/nts/380/graph?pset.0=on&test.SingleSource%2FBenchmarks%2FShootout-C%2B%2B%2Fwordfreq.compile=on> > 1.47% 0.3530 0.3582 0.0005 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/analyzer/analyzer.compile > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/si...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...SingleSource/Benchmarks/McGill/exptree SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/hello SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/reversefile SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/spellcheck SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/sumcol SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wc SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout-C++/wordfreq SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/hello SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-array-init SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-05-14-expr_stmt SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-14-initialize-string SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-BitfieldHandling SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionBitfields...

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...317 whetstone.ll 6 48962 0 0.01 48947 0 0.02 48947 Wildcard.ll 43 294055 0 0.03 294028 0 0.03 291611 wine_date_and_time.ll 9 28490 0 0.01 28460 0 0.01 27935 wirecosts.ll 1 15973 0 0.01 15940 0 0.01 15940 wireest.ll 2 15356 0 0.01 15323 0 0.01 19306 wireratio.ll 25 112740 0 0.02 112707 0 0.02 110112 wordfreq.ll 147 330838 9 0.03 330149 4 0.03 331225 woverlapf.ll 1 51817 0 0.01 51784 0 0.01 51784 woverlap.ll 1 48945 0 0.01 48912 0 0.01 48912 woverlapx.ll 1 55231 0 0.01 55198 0 0.02 55198 wrbmp.ll 8 92126 0 0.01 92095 0 0.01 92095 wrgif.ll 14 82861 0 0.02 82830 0 0.02 82830 write_ctables.ll 29 420986 0 0...