search for: woodpath

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "woodpath".

Did you mean: modpath
2004 Aug 06
3
AW: final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
...treams per server. So I guess I'll have to wait until Icecast 2 for doing a real prototype of this. Just so that I get this right - if I have 1000 different on-demand streams (its on-demand radio from huge mp3-library for users) mountpoints are definitly the way to go, yes ? Or am I on the woodpath ? Thanks a lot Andrew > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack@xiph.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2001 00:08 > An: Andreas Gunzenhauser > Cc: icecast@xiph.org > Betreff: Re: [icecast] final question: how many mountpoints > can icecast &g...
2004 Aug 06
0
AW: final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
...So I guess I'll have to wait until Icecast 2 for doing >a real prototype of this. > >Just so that I get this right - if I have 1000 different on-demand >streams (its on-demand radio from huge mp3-library for users) >mountpoints are definitly the way to go, yes ? Or am I on the woodpath ? Really, you're on completely the wrong path here - there's a simple way to do this. Remember: icecast just serves content over HTTP. If all you want to do is serve a static mp3 library to individual users, seperately, then a web server (such as apache) is much better suited to your needs...
2004 Aug 06
3
final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
Hi everyone I have one final question regarding my diploma work. As it seems, the hardware performance seems not to be the bottleneck when streaming out ONE stream to x clients. What happens when I use instead of ONE stream different streams, because my concept is an on-demand radio station that basically provides everyone with access to a huge library of music files and lets him create
2004 Aug 06
2
AW: AW: final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
...t until Icecast 2 for doing > >a real prototype of this. > > > >Just so that I get this right - if I have 1000 different on-demand > >streams (its on-demand radio from huge mp3-library for users) > >mountpoints are definitly the way to go, yes ? Or am I on > the woodpath ? > > Really, you're on completely the wrong path here - there's a simple > way to do this. Remember: icecast just serves content over > HTTP. If all > you want to do is serve a static mp3 library to individual > users, seperately, > then a web server (such as apache...