search for: wonko

...ot; (the mean of the response should be explained by the deterministic model part of the GLM, as far as I understood). How do I know the distribution family of the response? OK - its needs to be a discrete distribution, but there are Poisson, Binomial, Neg. Binomial. Any ideas? Many thanks, wonko

Hi, Ady wrote: > This is a quote from Wonko/Jaclaz, who has also been investigation this > issue and deserves credit for it: > Ok, not that I understand the code, but what *somehow* happens is that > the "embedded" checksum in Isolinux.bin (starting from 4.00) is the > checksum of the WHOLE file (i.e. starting from o...

Hi, i think i found a suspect in lzo/prepcore.c and it would indeed be a wrong range of checksumming (speculative congratulations to Ady). Looking at http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/blob/0d82b71304d596d80f3c4520f9dcf90048ca50b7:/lzo/prepcore.c it seems that this change in line 374 could yield correct checksums: unsigned int ptr; - for (ptr = 64; ptr < offset; ptr += 4) +

Anyone have any experience with a R510 with the PERC H200/H700 controller with ZFS? My perception is that Dell doesn''t play well with OpenSolaris. Thanks, Geoff

ok, so, dovecot 0.99.11, Solaris 9. i have: auth_userdb = passwd auth_passdb = shadow in my dovecot.conf, which gets me logged into dovecot in the first place, but then i get: Sep 9 09:52:41 ford.4amlunch.net imap-login: [ID 457029 mail.info] Internal login failure: wonko [10.0.1.6] in /var/log/syslog how do i track down exactly what the problem is so i can fix it? i would love to add SSL to my imap service, and don't care to mess with cyrus seeing how dovecot seems to be so nice. thanks!! -brian -- "The cats tend to administer themselves, and contrar...

> Ady wrote: > > This is a quote from Wonko/Jaclaz, who has also been investigation this > > issue and deserves credit for it: > > Ok, not that I understand the code, but what *somehow* happens is that > > the "embedded" checksum in Isolinux.bin (starting from 4.00) is the > > checksum of the WHOLE file (...

...ations to Ady). Thank you Thomas for your replies and for looking into this issue. My part on the initial investigation that triggered this email thread is relatively small. Others deserve much more credit. I was/am providing not just my own report, but their's too. This is a quote from Wonko/Jaclaz, who has also been investigation this issue and deserves credit for it: [quote] Ok, not that I understand the code, but what *somehow* happens is that the "embedded" checksum in Isolinux.bin (starting from 4.00) is the checksum of the WHOLE file (i.e. starting from offset 0 in...

Hi gurus, I like zpool iostat and I like system monitoring, so I setup a script within sma to let me get the zpool iostat figures through snmp. The problem is that as zpool iostat is only run once for each snmp query, it always reports a static set of figures, like so: root at exodus:snmp # zpool iostat -v capacity operations bandwidth pool used avail read

Hi to all, from syslinux 4.06 and 5.00 pre 12 came the same dump. Background: While trying to install syslinux on small (700 MB) FAT16 Partition on HP Server got Red Screen of Death with a register dump. Illegal OpCode EAX=00001F01 EBX=000001A4 ECX=00000000 EDX=00000019F EBP=0000FBFA ESI=000007BE EDI=00000800 DS=0000 ES=0000 FS=0000 GS=0000 CS:EIP=0000:000083A6 SS:ESP=1000:0000AFF6

After the interesting revelations about the X2100 and it''s hot-swap abilities, what are the abilities of the X2200-M2''s disk subsystem, and is ZFS going to tickle any wierdness out of them? -brian -- "The reason I don''t use Gnome: every single other window manager I know of is very powerfully extensible, where you can switch actions to different mouse buttons.

Hi, ok I know zfs-fuse is still incomplete and performance has not been considered, but still, before I''m going to use it for my /home I wanted a rough estimate. Another benchmark already asserted that zfs by itself, on Solaris, is a very fast beast (http://cmynhier.blogspot.com/2006/05/zfs-benchmarking.html), faster than ext3 on Linux and also faster than UFS. Interestingly UFS seems

I''m putting together a NexentaOS (b65)-based server that has 4 500 GB drives on it. Currently it has two, set up as a ZFS mirror. I''m able to boot Nexenta from it, and it seems to work ok. But, as I''ve learned, the mirror is not properly redundant, and so I can''t just have a drive fail (when I pull one, the OS ends up hanging, and even if I replace it, I have to

Hi. I''m all set for doing performance comparsion between Solaris/ZFS and FreeBSD/ZFS. I spend last few weeks on FreeBSD/ZFS optimizations and I think I''m ready. The machine is 1xQuad-core DELL PowerEdge 1950, 2GB RAM, 15 x 74GB-FC-10K accesses via 2x2Gbit FC links. Unfortunately the links to disks are the bottleneck, so I''m going to use not more than 4 disks, probably.

Does anyone know a good authentication tutorial they can suggest? I''ve tried several restful authentication ones and an authlogic one on RailsCast. But with each one I try, something seems to be missing in the tutorial and I can''t get it to work. I''m new to Rails so it''s possible user error on my part. I''m on Mac OS X 10.5 and I generate all my apps in

i don't know what happened, but it just started giving me better errors. i had to set first_valid_uid=100 since that's where my users start. wow, dovecot is FAST. -brian -- "The cats tend to administer themselves, and contrary to the expected facts, the house and everything in it was installed for their benefit." -- Nic Clews

i'd *really* like to get to maildir. so here it is, one last time.... using 0.99.x, can i have an mbox spool file and Maildir folders? for just one account? if i can do that, then it'll be a lot easier to transition the whole mess to Maildir. i use procmail called from postfix to deliver mail. is that going to be an issue for delivery? if i don't set DEFAULT and just change all

i have recently rebuilt dovecot on my mail server as i wanted to add SSL support for it. well, my OpenSSL libs are 64-bit, so what they hey, i'll build dovecot 64-bit as well. worked just fine, no issues at all. the setup is: Solaris 9/SPARC Sun C compiler Dovecot 0.99.14 after rebuilding it 64-bit, i now have a small problem however. I cannot save messages to IMAP folders from Mail.app

I've got Sun's Directory Server 5.2 installed here, and I would like to have dovecot use it for virtual users. I have the following questions: a) How do I get dovecot to link to DS's libraries? Am I better off just building OpenLDAP client libraries and linking dovecot with them instead? b) how about password-hash {CRYPT} in the OpenLDAP config file? Do I need to do anything to make

Ok, previous threads have lead me to believe that I want to make raidz vdevs [0] either 3, 5 or 9 disks in size [1]. Let''s say I have 8 disks. Do I want to create a zfs pool with a 5-disk vdev and a 3-disk vdev? Are there performance issues with mixing differently sized raidz vdevs in a pool? If there *is* a performance hit to mix like that, would it be greater or lesser than building

I''d love to be able to server zvols out as SCSI or FC targets. Are there any plans to add this to ZFS? That would be amazingly awesome. -brian -- "Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant. In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it''s just that most of the shit out there is built by people who''d be better suited to