search for: wolber

Is it practical to get a R/W file handle opened against an existing file on an unmounted ext2 filesystem? -- Chuck Wolber Electronic Flight Bag Crew Information Systems/ Linux Wonk 253.576.1154 "You can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards." --Steve Jobs

Thank you Brian Ripley, Gardar Johannesson, and Marcel Wolbers for your prompt and friendly help! I will share any further learnings as I move through these suggestions. -Bob Abugov Brian Ripley wrote: I just use optim() on the sum of squares with non-negativity constraints. That did not exist in 1999. Gardar Johannesson wrote: You can always just us...

As best I understand it, colSums (and associated functions) in S+ 6 are optimized functions (calling special C routines) for doing simple matrix math. For example, it seems like (in S+): all.equal(colSums(m), apply(m, 2, sum)) should be TRUE for any matrix m. It also seems like colSums (and its brethren) are very fast. My question: Are there equivalents to colSums in R? Thanks, Dave Kane

...platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os linux-gnu system i686, linux-gnu status major 1 minor 2.3 year 2001 month 04 day 26 language R Yours Marcel Wolbers PS: - On S-Plus Version 5.1 Release 1 for Linux 2.0.31 : 1999 > is.matrix(svd(matrix(1:12,nrow=1))$v) [1] T - Thanks a lot for the great piece of software you've written -- Marcel Wolbers, LEO C14, Seminar for Statistics, ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland; phone: (01) 632 2252...

During my initial download for my home directory backup, it took rsync over 6 hours to do the initial backup, but I can FTP the stuff in about 30 Mins. Is Rsync usualy this slow? I have compression turned on, and its across a 100 MB/S network, Anyone had this problem before? Steve Sills

rsync commandline: /usr/bin/rsync -e /usr/bin/ssh --archive --compress --sparse --verbose --stats --delete --numeric-ids --partial --relative --one-file-system target.host:/ /destination/path/ target rsync version: 2.6.3 destination rsync version: 2.6.2 The server we're trying to synchronize contains directories within "/" that are mounted to other locations within

...ith setting maxiter? (For example setting an upper limit to the number of function and gradient calls would be nice...) Sorry, I can't give a reproducable example. The code that produces the problem is not very handy to attach to the mail (it calls C code...). Thanks a lot in advance Marcel Wolbers -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat...

...> > > Platnum Computers, President > > > http://www.platnum.com > > > steve@platnum.com > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Streubert, Christoph" <Christoph.Streubert@disney.com> > > > To: "Chuck Wolber" <chuckw@quantumlinux.com>; "Steve Sills" > > > <steve@platnum.com> > > > Cc: <rsync@lists.samba.org> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 12:52 PM > > > Subject: RE: Rsync's Speed > > > > > > > > &gt...

Hi all, I want to setup a RAID storage system, where i have two systems connected to it. the filesystems are mapped out to both connectors. I want the master host mount them read write, and the slave read only. in my fstab on the slave I have a line like the following: /dev/sdb1 /mount ext3 acl,noauto,user_xattr,nosuid,ro 0 0 so in man 5 fstab, it is written, that when the 6. field

I have an ext3 filesystem mounted r/w on 1 host and r/o on multiple hosts. Dangerous but cost effective. I recently implemented some protection through a fc switch that restricts some hosts to r/o access to the data luns. So if someone types mount -o rw or something, all is not lost. The issue occurs when it's mounted r/w on 1 host and another host attempts to mount it r/o. The mount

What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive. I would like to keep 30 days worth. For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes along, I want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth. Any ideas how I can accomplish this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rysnc-Schedule-tf4104577.html#a11672997 Sent from the

...skus, I want to develop a prediction model. I followed your paper and analysed thro' weighted coxph approach. I can develop nomogram based on the final model also. But I do not know how to do internal validation of the model and subsequently obtain calibration plot. Is it possible to use Wolbers et al Epid 2009 approach 9 (R code for internal validation and calibration) . It is possible to get these measures after using R function 'crr' or 'FGR'. That is why I wanted to go in that route. At the same time, I had this doubt because their approach assume a record per indivi...

Hi all, I'm new to the rsync list. I've been searching for two days and have tried five different installs and so far none work the way I need them to. I have an "backup" server running rsync --version: rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29 Copyright (C) 1996-2005 by Andrew Tridgell and others <http://rsync.samba.org/> Capabilities: 64-bit files, socketpairs, hard

Other than what is printed on STD{OUT|ERR}, is there any functional difference between the -p and -y arguments in the e2fsck command? ..Chuck.. -- Chuck Wolber Electronic Flight Bag/ Network File Server Crew Information Systems/ OSS Wonk Mobile: 253.576.1154 Desk: 206.655.6918 "21. A person who is nice to you, but rude to the waiter, is not a nice person." -Dave Barry "25 things I have learned in 50 years!"

Just got this from our nightly backup rsync: overflow: flags=0x6e l1=99 l2=1952984691 lastname=var/www/manual/mod/mod_php4/de/function.get-exte ERROR: buffer overflow in receive_file_entry rsync error: error allocating core memory buffers (code 22) at util.c(238) Command exited with non-zero status 22 real 5.15 user 1.00 sys 0.88 Rsync version information: [root@gluon root]# rsync

I've been getting this error message for a few days from a customer's server and we can't seem to decipher it. I googled for it and only found references to it with respect to much older versions of rsync. We're running the Debian packaged version of rsync version 2.6.2-3. The customer side is running 2.6.3 compiled from source. #### inflate (token) returned -5 rsync error:

Have the hard-links optimizations that were described here been implemented? http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2004-January/008137.html In any case, what's the general consensus behind using the --hard-links option on large (100GB and above) images? Does it still use a ton of memory? Or has that situation been alleviated? ..Chuck.. -- http://www.quantumlinux.com Quantum Linux

Hi, We back up a lot of machines with varying version of rsync installed on them. The oldest machine (hopefully soon to be retired) is running rsync version 2.5.7 (protocol version 26). We back this machine up from "/" onwards with a few excludes in there. I noticed today that whenever we use the --relative and --delete flags together, the --delete flag seems to have no affect.

Just built 2.6.1 and started testing it. Nice job guys. I especially love the --progress and hardlink tweaks. Quite often, while I have systems backing up out of cron, I'd love to be able to see the --progress. Unfortunately, it's just not practical to crank up the verbosity like that on a regular basis (some of these systems have a few million files). A neat feature I'd like to see

Hi - there's a flag for rsync to compress the files in transit - is it possible to compress one side (target) with gzip and have rsync still work correctly? Any help would be appreciated. -- Ken