search for: wogri

...olution anywhere. Does anybody have dsync running without problems on a high volume mailserver? I see the following logs, examples given: Feb 17 18:16:49 dovecot dovecot: imap(zoechi): Warning: /var/mail/zoechi/dovecot-uidlist: Duplicate file entry at line 10395: 1487350019.M138380P28563.dovecot.wogri.at,S=18930,W=19377 (uid 41092 -> 41093) - retrying by re-reading from beginning with this one I?m not sure - it might be that this is completely OK because due to replication UIDs clash. Maybe that?s OK, but I couldn?t find a confirmation. Feb 17 18:16:49 dovecot dovecot: imap(zoechi): Warnin...

On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:09, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > On 17 Feb 2017, at 21.37, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Dovecot Users, >> >> I?ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and get user complaints which I can?t explain. I found similar threads on this mailinglist, but I couldn?t find a solution anywhere. Does anybody...

...le replication this behaviour goes away. I use dovecot from debian stable resources. Any help would _really_ be appreciated. I found one german thread that dealt with the same problem, but no solution for it (http://www.dovecot-buch.de/mailingliste/pop3-fehler-bei-delete-und-dsync-replikation/) wogri # dovecot --version 2.2.13 # dovecot -n # 2.2.13: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 8.0 ext4 auth_verbose = yes doveadm_password = XXX first_valid_gid = 113 first_valid_uid = 108 last_valid_gid = 113 last_valid_uid = 108 mail_gid = dovecot mail_location = maildir...

Hi, I know this may be very basic question but I need some help . Actually I installed VM using the Xen Administrative console. Now I need to change the configuration file as I need to passthrough (using the pci-hide) a SCSI contoller from Dom0 to DomU. But I couldnot find the configuration file. Where can I find the Configuration file for this DomU? Actually I added the

...this option: pop3_deleted_flag = "$POP3Deleted? The issue no longer persists. I have to manually expunge the kept mails that have been deleted via pop3 though: doveadm expunge mailbox INBOX KEYWORD '$POP3Deleted' -A Wolfgang > On 21 Jun 2015, at 21:05, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > > FWIW I just tried the sdbox mailbox format for a singe user (not the whole installation) by overriding the mail-userattr via ldap and the problem persists, so I don?t think it?s an issue with maildir per se, but rather a pop3 / replication issue or a misconfigurat...

On 17 Feb 2017, at 21.37, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > > Hi Dovecot Users, > > I?ve configured dovecot dsync replication and I see troubles in the logs and get user complaints which I can?t explain. I found similar threads on this mailinglist, but I couldn?t find a solution anywhere. Does anybody have dsync runn...

...singe user (not the whole installation) by overriding the mail-userattr via ldap and the problem persists, so I don?t think it?s an issue with maildir per se, but rather a pop3 / replication issue or a misconfiguration on my side. Wolfgang > On 20 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > When I enable (and it only happens when it is actually running) replication over TCP my users get duplicate mails via pop3. > Here?s what happens: > > * User gets mail > * Mail appears in (Maildir) new/ folder on both replicas > *...

...in the pair, you still see the issue? I'm not seeing that in my setup. I only see it when concurrently connecting the same user to two different nodes in the pair. Blessings, Rob Archibald CTO, EndFirst LLC rob at robarchibald.com > On Mar 24, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Wolfgang Hennerbichler <wogri at wogri.com> wrote: > > Rob, > > Unfortunately I don?t think the director will solve this problem. I have a director in front of my setup and it is configured to point every client to one server. It didn?t change anything in its behavior. > I also have a setup without a direc...

...number of reasons out of scope for this email. *My question now is in regards to proper locking. Please see the following links. The libvirt hook looks good, but is there any expectation that this arrangement will become a patch to libvirt itself, as is suggested by the second link?* http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/ http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html Can anyone guide me on how to theoretically build a very "lock" safe 5-node active-active KVM cluster atop Ceph RBD? Must I use sanlock with its NFS or GFS2 with its performanc...

..., deleted messages to re-appear. I would hope that one-way synchronisation would avoid this, but I?d also like to know if the -R parameter is safe to use. I am also still wondering if anybody has a perfectly working 2-way-synchronised dovecot installation (and I?m interested in your dovecot -n). wogri

Eric, Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple. http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html I've seen this hook here : http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/ But it's a hook... Yes, I may try to write a patch. My coding skills are surely not as good as yours but I 'd be glad to make a try :) -----Message d'origine----- De : Eric Blake [mailto:eblake@redhat.com] Envoyé : jeudi 7 novembre 2013 16:40 À : NE...

..., deleted messages to re-appear. I would hope that one-way synchronisation would avoid this, but I?d also like to know if the -R parameter is safe to use. I am also still wondering if anybody has a perfectly working 2-way-synchronised dovecot installation (and I?m interested in your dovecot -n). wogri

Is it stable for dovecot 2.2.27 to implement DRBD (or HAST) on block level for maildir data replication instead of using dsync plugin? Regards, George

Hi, One short question : Is there any chance to see locks on rbd/images in the next release ? Thank you :)

...this email. > > *My question now is in regards to proper locking. Please see the following > links. The libvirt hook looks good, but is there any expectation that this > arrangement will become a patch to libvirt itself, as is suggested by the > second link?* > > http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/ > > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html > > Can anyone guide me on how to theoretically build a very "lock" safe 5-node > active-active KVM cluster atop Ceph RBD? Must I use sanlock with its NFS &g...

..., deleted messages to re-appear. I would hope that one-way synchronisation would avoid this, but I?d also like to know if the -R parameter is safe to use. I am also still wondering if anybody has a perfectly working 2-way-synchronised dovecot installation (and I?m interested in your dovecot -n). wogri

...ges to re-appear. I would hope that one-way synchronisation would avoid this, but I?d also like to know if the -R parameter is safe to use. > I am also still wondering if anybody has a perfectly working 2-way-synchronised dovecot installation (and I?m interested in your dovecot -n). > > wogri