search for: wodnicki

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 67 matches for "wodnicki".

2013 Jan 10
3
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On 1/10/2013 12:11 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > >> Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically >> any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped >> if needed. > > You're completely ignoring communities that compile code outside > llvm+clang. A...
2013 Jan 13
3
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
...a and write an entry on the website. This is the only way how you can fix all the weird stuff you done in a moment. All: If anyone has the old taball + sig please let me know where I can download them to replace the current ones if Pawel will fail to do so. On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >> >>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17P...
2011 Oct 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
On 10/17/2011 09:20 AM, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > > My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate > that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. > It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. > My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started > eating megabytes of memory...
2013 Jan 11
6
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On F...
2013 Jan 14
1
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 01:41:06PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 1/14/2013 12:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >> Brooks, > >> > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks D...
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/11/2013 3:59 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >>...
2013 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically > any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped > if needed. You're completely ignoring communities that compile code outside llvm+clang. Any compiler chosen by that group...
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
...ooks message. http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-January/058088.html Paweł > > All: If anyone has the old taball + sig please let me know where I can > download them to replace the current ones if Pawel will fail to do so. > > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 1...
2013 Jan 14
3
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > Brooks, > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>&g...
2010 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] ToT ARM Code generator causing - Error: invalid constant (xxx) after fixup in assembly output
...e been lots of bugs in ARMConstantIslands where it's off by > 1, but I haven't seen one where it's off by a lot like this. The big offset is due to this one large basic block and is not a problem with alignment or any off by 1 issue. > > On Aug 17, 2010, at 7:53 PMPDT, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This problem happens in ToT under specific conditions - namely there is >> a big BB#671 basic block of code >> the just copies data from memory location to another. At the beginning >> of BBB#671 r0 is loaded >> from the jumptabl...
2010 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] ToT ARM Code generator causing - Error: invalid constant (xxx) after fixup in assembly output
On Aug 18, 2010, at 11:37 AMPDT, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: > On 8/18/2010 12:39 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> I can look at this, but you'll need to send the .bc file. Please >> open a PR? > > I would do it but I am in a bit of a pickle as the .bc is from > propriety code and > I can not post it. Can't hel...
2011 Oct 17
2
[LLVMdev] LLC ARM Backend maintainer
My first ARM testing results or lack of them indicate that 3.0 release requires some some beefy machines to build. It is not so much raw cpu speed but memory and lots of it. My builds got to linking llc and at that point linker started eating megabytes of memory like chocolate. So sadly chumbys, beagleboards, iThingis(?), Raspberry Pis, Gumstix and even inexpensive Tegra2 boards seem to be out of
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/14/2013 12:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 01:00:55PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> Brooks, >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >>>> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>>>> wrote: >>>>>&gt...
2013 Jan 11
2
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: > >> > >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski > >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: > &g...
2012 Nov 17
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] !!! 3.2 Release branch patching and the Code Owners
On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:52 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >>> This approach is fine for casual reader but >>> does not work for scripting or any automated >>> way of dealing with the build. >> Will you please clarify how the automation / scripting helps with the >> patch a...
2013 Jan 10
5
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
Hello, I have been following this discussion for a while and I think the question we should be asking is: Why do we want to even bother with all these other broken C++ compilers in a first place? Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically any platform I can think of or it can be cross-bootstrapped if needed. I think usage of any language features should be decided based on
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/11/2013 2:51 PM, Justin Holewinski wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.c...
2013 Jan 11
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer wrote: >> >> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Benjamin Kramer >>> <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 11.01.2013, at
2013 Jan 13
0
[LLVMdev] Obsolete PTX is NOT completely removed in 3.2 release
Brooks, > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 02:47:01PM -0600, Pawel Wodnicki wrote: >> On 1/11/2013 2:40 PM, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:33:17PM +0100, Benjamin Kramer >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11.01.2013, at 21:31, Justin Holewinski >>>> <justin.holewinski at gmail.com> wrote: >>...
2013 Jan 10
0
[LLVMdev] Using C++'11 language features in LLVM itself
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > On 1/10/2013 12:11 PM, dag at cray.com wrote: > > Pawel Wodnicki <root at 32bitmicro.com> writes: > > > >> Clang is good enough to bootstrap itself on practically > >> any platform I can think of or it can be cross-boo...