Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "wlcrls47".
2015 Aug 29
2
Disabling host key checking on LAN
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Perfect, thanks. This winds up working for me (as far as I've tested so
>> far.)
>>
>> Match exec "ping -q -c 1 -t 1 %n | grep '192\.168\....
2015 Aug 27
3
Disabling host key checking on LAN
...initially anticipate (or at least I
> didn't). Also I am not using this mode with asterisk (*), but with
> fixed hostnames (to determine ipv4-or-ipv6 connection without using
> DNS) so it might not work at all.
>
> b.
>
>
> On 27 August 2015 at 01:25, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You nailed it. I am using a single word hostname.
> >
> > Is there any way for me to specify the private IP space I'm using, so I
> can
> > use single word hostnames in the command line, without having to list
> each
> > of them i...
2015 Aug 26
5
Disabling host key checking on LAN
If I want to specify for LAN addresses that I don't want to deal with host
keys, how do I do that? Understanding the risks, knowing almost everyone
will say not to do this - it's a horrible idea, but deciding I want to do
it anyway. Tired of having to remove entries from known_hosts with the
multiple VM's I have that often change fingerprints, and am willing to live
with the risks.
2015 Aug 30
2
Disabling host key checking on LAN
...beit not very elegant.
And it does help deal with the round-robin, or /etc/hosts published
hostnames in a way that "dig" does not.
> On 29 August 2015 at 12:25, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Walter Carlson <wlcrls47 at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Perfect, thanks. This winds up working for me (as far as I've tested
>> >> so
>> >> far.)
&...
2015 Aug 10
2
Re: machine='pc-q35-2.1' and sata controller
What's the status of the SATA controller migration bug? Are the
patches for it expected to be in 2.4?
Looks like they didn't make it into 2.3.
Since you last wrote, if the SATA controller patches aren't in yet, is
there any new way to avoid the SATA controller device, if you have no
SATA devices?
Thank you.
=== REPLYING TO ===
On 02/23/2015 02:26 PM, Thomas Stein wrote:
>