search for: wizes

Dear R wizes, I have a data.frame of species abundances with column names consisting of 4 letter codes then an underscore and a number like this: abco_1, abco_2, abco_3, psm_1, psme_2, psme_3, etc. I would like to get an identifier for all the abco, and psme and other species etc. I used spec...

OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container Samba 4.11.x and up Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server that can coexist with the samba ad dc internal DNS server? The way that I have it set up, whenever samba is not running, then I can't use any web resources b/c everything goes through the samba internal DNS. So I can't do system updates and upgrades unless samba is running. I saw

================================================================== "When one teaches, two learn." Robert Half ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.6 include: o Fix smbd panic on invalid NetBIOS session request

================================================================== "When one teaches, two learn." Robert Half ================================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba 3.5. Major enhancements in Samba 3.5.6 include: o Fix smbd panic on invalid NetBIOS session request

Hi Rowland, Thats not the point here, if this is a AD-DC or not.. ;-) I'll explain. This is about, how DNS requests are done on the system and accepted by the "dns service" You can install unlimited DNS servers on the AD-DC and chain them, but wize.. No offcourse not. :-) Turning off systemd-resolved is probably a good idea, yes, it is. But it does not harm if its on as long

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Jonathan Kreider via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 16 september 2020 2:20 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] AD DC DNS question > > OS = Ubuntu 18.04 in an LXD container > Samba 4.11.x and up > > Is there a way to have DNS resolution on the server

CentOS-6.6 Is there any command line program that determines and reports what pam_cracklib.so returns for a given password; subject to variation in the command line options and values provided? For example, assuming a cli driver program called cli_driver_pgm: cli_driver_pgm pam_cracklib.so difok=8 minlen=14 dcredit=3 ucredit=3 lcredit=3 ocredit=3 minclass=2 maxrepeat=3 maxsequence=3

Hai Rowland, > > No, you haven't done anything wrong and yes the provision > does set Domain Users to '100' in idmap.ldb. > Ow.. This i did not know, only wondering why its not BUILTIN\users ( how it is in windows ). Do you know as of which version this is? Of as of start, i really never noticed this. > > Do not remove Domain Users, but you are correct,

Hai, > > I think you are misunderstanding what I wrote ;-) Thats possible yes.. Lucky you better in explaining then me in english. ;-) > > If you open 'idmap.ldb' and search for 513 (Domain Users > RID), you will > find: > > dn: CN=S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-513 > cn: S-1-5-21-1768301897-3342589593-1064908849-513 > objectClass: sidMap

On 02/07/2018 05:01 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai, > > Ok, for the sysvol. > I'll put all steps here again. > > I suggest start with this one. > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh > This checks and set the rights to be known to be right. ( aka works great for me ) ;-) > Thanks, but before I run that

On 2020/7/28 ??2:05, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches submitted a couple of

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. > git pull git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git mlx5-next > > They also depend Jason Wang's patches

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 08:34:32AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 04:51:27PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 09:05:29AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > > > in mlx5-next branch in > > >

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:20:36PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Hi Michael, > please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches > in mlx5-next branch in > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. Thanks! OK so what's the plan for merging this? Do patches at least build well enough that I can push them upstream? Or do they have to go on

Hello guys Yesterday afternoon kerberos stopped working on both of our domain controllers. Unfortunately, I did not have time to examine it thoroughly, I needed to have it up asap. I know that RDP authentication took a few minutes, but it ended up being logged. LDAP was normally working. There were a lot of these messages in the logs: [2018/04/22 14:46:43.315705, 1]

ok, do the following. set ignore systemacl to yes on sysvol and netlogon. login as dom\administrator computer manager, connect to dc. share sysvol, goto share security, reset to defalts. same for folder. goto gpo manager, klik on every gpo object, if one has wrong acl, you get a message to reset it, thats ok. now never samba-tool sysvol reset if you do, you might need to set share/file

On 2020/8/5 ??1:01, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:29:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:20:36PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>>

Hai, Ok, for the sysvol. I'll put all steps here again. I suggest start with this one. wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh This checks and set the rights to be known to be right. ( aka works great for me ) ;-) Then follow these steps. - login as dom\administrator. - start computer manager, connect to dc. - klik Shared Folders, Shares,

hai Micha,   The why is explained here. https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/The_SYSTEM_Account  Which in the end has todo with SID_BOTH, one sid for a user and group, linux does not understand that correctly.   with : acl_xattr:ignore system acls = [yes|no] When set to yes, a best effort mapping from/to the POSIX ACL layer will not be done by this module. The default is no, which means that Samba

On 2020/7/28 ??2:32, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/7/28 ??2:05, Eli Cohen wrote: >>> Hi Michael, >>> please note that this series depends on mlx5 core device driver patches >>> in mlx5-next branch in >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mellanox/linux.git. >>> >>>