search for: wither

Hi, I have a question about running multiple in regressions in R and then storing the coefficients. I have a large dataset with several variables, one of which is a state variable, coded 1-50 for each state. I'd like to run a regression of 28 select variables on the remaining 27 variables of the dataset (there are 55 variables total), and specific for each state, ie run a regression of

We use Informix database. I was able to connect to the database with S-PLUS by using its CONNECT/Java through the JDBC driver. How can I connect to Informix with R, wither using JDBC or any other method? we run Linux so I prefer a method other than ODBC. Thankx for the help

Hello All, Please forgive the lack of understanding as of yet but I have been trying to follow the mailing list messages over the last few days and would like to know if someone could wither point me into the right direction or possibly give me a brief overview of the complete process. Basically, I see that the Asterisk PBX systems can run on linux and seems to offer the engine base that is needed for the SIP clients to connect. Additionally, it seems that the various hardware (of wh...

...g. #2 - Is the community strong? I'm new to the community and when I look on distrowatch it's way down the list. But is this accurate or is CentOS picking up steam? I get the feeling it's picking up steam. The reason this is important is because I'd hate to pick it only to watch it wither and have to go distro-hopping again. Once again, looking for stability. Any responses that can help me decide are appreciated. Thanks. Preston

I have been unable to get rattle to run in my new Windows7-64 bit configuration. For wither Rgtk2 or rattle, I get an error: Entry point not found The procedure entry point g_assetion_message_expr could not be located in the dynamic link library libglib-2.0-0.dll. Any help is really appreciated.

I have been having a problem with my Samba server for about a month now and need help. I am having users mysteriously losing access to drives during the day. The drive will un-map itself and any further attempt to access it through wither Windows Explorer or just typing the UNC in the "Run" window will result in a "Drive or path not accessible" error. On the samba side, nothing shows up in the logs on subsequent connections, so I'm unsure how to diagnose what the problem is. Attempts to access the share...

Folks, To implement this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19142 I need an LLVM intrinsic to communicate the need to lower the builtin wither to noop or a call or even a sequence of instructions. I thought about: void @llvm.clear_cache(i8 * begin, i8 * end) to simulate precisely GCC's builtin: void __builtin___clear_cache (char *begin, char *end) which will be, by default, nothing. On ARM and MIPS, it'll call __clear_cach...

Keir moved barriers, Competence questions are raised: Correctness withers. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> diff -r 067b9aacb6c2 linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c --- a/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c Wed Oct 12 09:11:35 2005 +++ b/linux-2.6-xen-sparse/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_comms.c Thu Oct 13 01...

Hi list, I have a VPN mesh with ~10 nodes. A recently added node experience the 'Received UDP packet from unknown source' problem. I read in the faq this is probably caused by a NAT rule on wither side, but I dont have such rules. The thing is that IP in the 'Received UDP packet from unknown source ' message is exactly what I have configured. The problem solves itself with time and this is marked in the logs as: tinc.vpn[25833]: Lost 219 packets from UA_VPN When the tunnel works...

...d be greatly appreciated. ===================================== I have been having a problem with my Samba server for about a month now and need help. I am having users mysteriously losing access to drives during the day. The drive will un-map itself and any further attempt to access it through wither Windows Explorer or just typing the UNC in the "Run" window will result in a "Drive or path not accessible" error. On the samba side, nothing shows up in the logs on subsequent connections, so I'm unsure how to diagnose what the problem is. Attempts to access the share fro...

...using rsync to keep two directores on two servers in sync. Machine A, the "client" is the one where the rsync process is invoked, which then logs into Machine B, the "server" as root with ssh and a key. The key is restricted in /root/.ssh/authorized_keys to a script that checks wither $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND matches the rsync --server command that I expect, such as, for example, rsync --server -re.iLsfxC --delete . /etc/dhcp/synced/ Unfortunately, this is rather restrictive and unflexible. Things would be easier if rsync would have an option like --restrict-write, making rsync n...

...eived this error? Did I perhaps miss an announcement? I looked about the list, but nothing regarding this was apparent to me. TIA - -- Alex White prata at kuei-jin.org Fingerprint = 58DC 9199 CE73 74E8 B2C1 442E ACF5 92E0 E068 C46C gpg key location: http://www.kuei-jin.org/GPG-KEY-PRATA ~From the withered tree, a flower blooms --Zen Proverb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCgMlwrPWS4OBoxGwRArUIAJ9Qr6ST5/9acQD6XwQoaZJ7lI8ztwCeK4pU ukvh3E6R1POrNkAkZRejjFg= =J5+I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

...one via "if (verbose > 1)", so with the standard 'rsync -av' there are no indicators that would tell somebody rsync failed to handle a particular file... One way of "unclobbering" this is by forcing another call to f_name after the check_hard_link() call is finished (wither in check_hard_link itself or in recv_generator), but that smells rather nasty... On the other hand, reimplementing f_name to make it sane would require some bigger changes, since f_name() happens to be quite a popular function inside the rsync code... This is bad and needs some fixing... Little ha...

If I make a call to asterisk's r2 E1 I get these errors *CLI> Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Rx bits 0x1 [1/ 1/ 0/ 0] Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Detected Jan 10 16:16:38 WARNING[1089170112]: chan_unicall.c:634 unicall_error: UniCall: mfcr2 Making a new call with CRN

I put this to the smp list and to stable but have had no takers from wither. nThere are both smp and other system issues and I am just wondering if anyoe would be willing to take a look at this output from dmesg and let me have some advice Thanks david ----- Original Message ----- From: "vizion communication" <vizion@ixpres.com> To: <freebsd-smp@freebs...

...arging circuitry (350W MGE Evolution). * For testing power failure scenarios, I would use a power strip switch or a circuit breaker before tripping a GFCI. I have no scientific basis for that, just feels better for some reason. * Although you certainly have a point about not letting UPS batteries wither on the shelf, if someone is planning to set up many independent UPS-computer pairs with inexpensive UPSes, it might be worth having a "hot spare" UPS that is rotated in occasionally during service windows. The battery charger failure I mentioned above did not allow me to continue using th...

Hello everyone! Could you tell me if FreeBSD supports memory page nulling when releasing it to prevent unauthorized access to data left in the page after it's allocated again. If it does, what sys calls etc provide that? IMHO this is an important issue when operating data with different sensivity levels. Thanks in advance. Nick

...I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can control wither users can enable encryption or not by delegating (or not) the "encryption" and "keytype" properties. So there is no need to use the pool wrapping key (ie require the kek to be available) to restrict creation of encrytped datasets. If the admin doesn''t want encryptio...

...I was > wondering if you considered.. > > Can an encrypted dataset (keytype=dataset) reside in a non-encrypted (no > kek defined) pool? I can see a case for and against allowing this when considering it purely at the feature level as users/admins see things. The admin can control wither users can enable encryption or not by delegating (or not) the "encryption" and "keytype" properties. So there is no need to use the pool wrapping key (ie require the kek to be available) to restrict creation of encrytped datasets. If the admin doesn''t want encryptio...

Can anyone answer if we will get zfs de-duplication before SXCE EOL? If possible also anser the same on encryption? Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org