Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "withecho".
Did you mean:
witech
2016 Sep 25
0
withAutoprint({ .... }) ?
...n top of source() definitely makes sense,
> > unless, as Bill says, source() itself could provide the same feature.
>
> I was really mainly asking for advice about the function name
> .. and got none.
I missed that part. I think the name is good. A shorter alternative
would be withEcho(), but could be a little bit misleading since it
doesn't reflect 'print=TRUE' to source().
>
> I'm now committing my version (including (somewhat incomplete)
> documentation, so you (all) can look at it and try / test it further.
>
> > To differentiate between...
2016 Sep 25
3
withAutoprint({ .... }) ?
>>>>> Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Sat, 24 Sep 2016 11:31:49 -0700 writes:
> Martin, did you post your code for withAutoprint() anywhere?
> Building withAutoprint() on top of source() definitely makes sense,
> unless, as Bill says, source() itself could provide the same feature.
I was really mainly asking