search for: withdraw

...n and a combinatorial explosion of the specs. I attached the full files to this email. For brevity, I will use scenario 1 in the body of this email. For the purpose of this exercise, one should imagine that each specification is at least 5 lines. Here is how I implemented scenario 1: context %{A Withdrawal where an Account is in credit AND the card is valid AND the dispenser contains cash AND the customer requests cash} do specify "should debit the account" do end specify "should dispense cash" do end specify "should return the card"...

entercount an error with demo(scoping). > demo(scoping) demo(scoping) ---- ~~~~~~~ ___snip_____ > ross$balance() Your balance is 120 > try(ross$withdraw(500)) Error in ross$withdraw(500) : You don't have that much money! > version _ platform i486-pc-linux-gnu arch i486 os linux-gnu system i486, linux-gnu status beta major 2 minor 1.1 year 2005 month 06 day 13 language R -- Department of Sociology...

Hi all, Is there any command or function to withdraw a command performed already in R? For instance, after drawing a line in existing plot, can I remove the line in the plot? I know I can use a way of overlapping on the former line so that it looks like a removing the line, but I'm wondering there is a command to retract the already performed co...

...optimistic.I am very scared, annoyed, and irritated.Iraq?s political crisis entered its second week one step closer to the potential.dissolution of the government, with a call for elections by a vital coalition partner and a suicide attack that extended the spate of violence. that has followed the withdrawal.of U.S. troops" > sentDetect(s, language = "en") #getting output in the following way [1] "I am very happy, excited, and optimistic.I am very scared, annoyed, and irritated.Iraq?s " [2] "political crisis entered its sec...

...received it (and no Uwe that does not mean I am claiming you never sent it - just that I did not receive it!). Not quite the "thank you for contributing to R" I hoped for, but after 7 years or so, it is unfortunately what I expected... Therefore this is to let you know that I am hereby withdrawing my package Rigroup-0.84.0 from CRAN consideration. You can obviously keep using the previous (now-archived) version under its license. But since I will no longer be supporting the package and as its author I ask you to remove all versions from CRAN. This is of course your choice given the ori...

I do not code php, I only use it in things like Roundcubemail, so I was at first surprised that the config file was missing the closing ?> tag. Then I noticed that ALL of the various php config files where missing it. So I did some googling and found out it is actually recommended to leave it off. Humph. On 04/05/2017 12:09 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am installing Roundcubemail

MiKTeX has abruptly removed texi2dvi.exe from its distribution. (MiKTeX broke its updating process earlier and an attempted update trashed the updater on my installation so I was forced to make a fresh install of the current distribution. I do not know if updates remove a currently installed texi2dvi.exe.) This has two consequences: 1) It is used by tools::texi2dvi() if found. As far as I

Please I would like that my email address be withdrawn from contact list.Sincerely yours  Fernanda Melo Carneiro contato: (62) 3521-1480 e 8121-7374www.ecoevol.ufg.br Laboratório de Ecologia Teórica e Síntese (UFG)   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...levant interface eth2.IPv4 for mDNS. Jun 9 20:34:46 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]: Registering new address record for fe80::5e6c:c0ff:fe7d:1d00 on eth2.*. Jun 9 20:34:46 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]: Registering new address record for 10.0.0.93 on eth2.IPv4. Jun 9 20:34:55 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]: Withdrawing address record for 10.0.0.93 on eth2. Jun 9 20:34:55 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]: Leaving mDNS multicast group on interface eth2.IPv4 with address 10.0.0 .93. Jun 9 20:34:55 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]: Interface eth2.IPv4 no longer relevant for mDNS. Jun 9 20:34:55 rutsey avahi-daemon[2150]:...

...2004 +++ R-intro.texi Tue Aug 24 11:21:39 2004 @@ -3966,17 +3966,27 @@ @} ) @} +@end example +The function can then be used as follows: -ross <- open.account(100) -robert <- open.account(200) +@example +> ross <- open.account(100) +> robert <- open.account(200) -ross$withdraw(30) -ross$balance() -robert$balance() +> ross$withdraw(30) +30 withdrawn. Your balance is 70 +> ross$balance() +Your balance is 70 +> robert$balance() +Your balance is 200 -ross$deposit(50) -ross$balance() -ross$withdraw(500) +> ross$deposit(50) +50 deposited. Your balance is 120...

If I want to wrap two account updates, the syntax is ... Account.transaction(dennis, david) do dennis.withdraw(10); david.deposit(10); end .. where both dennis and david are instances of Account. Can someone please let me know what the syntax is for starting and ending a *single* database transactions which spans two *different* kinds of models/tables ? Dennis Byrne -------------- next part --------...

Hello! I just joined this mailing list, so I apologize in advance if this topic has already been covered. Red Hat and Suse announced they are no longer supporting OpenLDAP in future releases. https://www.ostechnix.com/redhat-and-suse-announced-to- withdraw-support-for-openldap/ However, we mainly use CentOS and while it's a RH derivative, I wanted to find out what CentOS plans on doing in this regard. Will you continue to include OpenLDAP or will it simply be removed? I wasn't able to find any CentOS related articles in response to this, a...

...{ >> balance = b; >> } >> ~Account(){ } >> >> int read() { >> int r; >> r = balance; >> return r; >> } >> >> void deposit(int n) { >> balance = balance + n; >> } >> >> void withdraw(int n) { >> int r = read(); >> balance = r - n; >> } >> }; >> >> int main (){ >> Account* a = new Account(10); >> a->deposit(1); >> a->withdraw(2); >> delete a; >> } >> >> /********************...

...**********************************************/ #include <stdio.h> class Account { int balance; public: Account(int b) { balance = b; } ~Account(){ } int read() { int r; r = balance; return r; } void deposit(int n) { balance = balance + n; } void withdraw(int n) { int r = read(); balance = r - n; } }; int main (){ Account* a = new Account(10); a->deposit(1); a->withdraw(2); delete a; } /***********************************************************/ So after the instrumentation my program should look like : /*************...

.../messages [root at sunspot ray]# tail /var/log/messages Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Registering new address record for xx.xx.xx.15 on eth0. Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Registering new address record for xx.xx.xx.20 on eth0. Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Withdrawing address record for xx.xx.xx.20 on eth0. Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Registering new address record for xx.xx.xx.20 on eth0. Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Registering new address record for xx.xx.xx.21 on eth0. Sep 7 06:50:31 sunspot avahi-daemon[2203]: Withdrawing...

...after inliner and with >= O1 >> somewhere late", but it doesn't look like it works this way (otherwise, you >> wouldn't need to call PMBuilder.addExtension twice). >> ? > This was actually my question to Devang. > Any other suggestions for the EP name? OK, I withdraw my suggestion :) - Devang

...e(id = rep(1:3, 3), date = as.Date(rep(c("2005-08-25", "2005-08-26", "2005-08-29"), each = 3)), decod = c("SCREEN", "SCREEN", "SCREEN", "RAND", "RAND", "RAND", "COMPLETE", "COMPLETE", "WITHDRAWAL") ) What I need is it to return is: id x.decod.1. end 1 1 COMPLETE 2005-08-29 2 2 COMPLETE 2005-08-29 3 3 WITHDRAWAL 2005-08-29 I can get the max date and the id 2 different ways: > do.call("rbind", lapply(split(...

...SB Live! Platinum, on the other hand, seems to work just fine... Anyway, to handle jitter, the queue removal behavior is like this: If the playback buffering thread finds that the incoming packet queue is empty, it waits for at least two packets to be present in the queue before continuing to withdraw from it. (In the meantime it inserts silence, though I'm going to change this to have Speex fabricate the missing data.) When it successfully withdraws a packet from the queue, it will continue withdrawing until there is less than two packets in the queue. The goal is to minimize latency...

...t; ~Account(){ } >>> >>> int read() { >>> int r; >>> r = balance; >>> return r; >>> } >>> >>> void deposit(int n) { >>> balance = balance + n; >>> } >>> >>> void withdraw(int n) { >>> int r = read(); >>> balance = r - n; >>> } >>> }; >>> >>> int main (){ >>> Account* a = new Account(10); >>> a->deposit(1); >>> a->withdraw(2); >>> delete a; >>&g...

...ill find it with 'g', and mail-notification shows it as well. After reading it in gnus, when I exit the group (which pushes read marks to the IMAP server), thunderbird usually shows the message as read immediately, but often mail-notification waits for a while (up to about a minute) before withdrawing the new-mail notification. I just tried this and thunderbird was also slow in showing the mail read. marking the message read in thunderbird caused mail-notification to show the message as read, but with a 30s lag. mail-notification is supposed to use IDLE if available. Sometimes it withdraw...