search for: with_scop

So, I hear that with_scope is going to be deprecated. Which is a bit of a shame, given the stuff I''ve been writing recently. I have a CMS with multiple clients. A ''client'' is essentially a company, with multiple users. Content on the site belongs to a client - content could be messages, image...

Hi, It seems that setting a with_scope on the parent class doesn''t do anything MyClass.with_scope(:find=>{:conditions=> ["somecol = ?", ''val'']}) do @ext_pages, @ext_rows = paginate :my_extended_class, { :per_page => 13 } end # this doesn''t generate WHERE somecol='...

I have the following code: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :requests do def find_active(options = {}) with_scope :find => { :conditions => ["requests.active = ?", true] } do find(:all, options) end end end end Executing user.requests.find_active results in the following SQL: SELECT * FROM requests WHERE (( requests.user_id = 10 ) AND ( requests.active = 1 )) AND (requests.u...

I have Acts_As_Taggable Plugin working. I have a HR controller and a sales controller. I have a document in hr tagged whitepaper and a differnent document in sales tagged whitepaper when I am in hr I see the hr document tagged with whitepaper and not the sale document (what I want). but if I click on the tag whitepaper I return two documents, hr and sales. I just want to return the hr document

(I''ve had this patch lying around for a couple of weeks, waiting for Trac to come back up. noradio''s already had a look at it on IRC. What''s the best way to submit patches while Trac is down?) with_scope doesn''t support :order in the presence of :include. For example: {{{ # We''re testing the interaction between :order, :include, and with_scope. TEST_ORDER = ''tickets.created_at DESC'' TEST_INCLUDE = [''owner''] def test_find(opts1, opts2)...

Hi there, I have something like the following: class Person < AR:B ... ... has_many :votes has_many :chosen_answers, :through => :votes, :source => :answer, :select => ''DISTINCT answers.*'' do def my_answers(whodunnit) chosen_answers.with_scope(:find => { :conditions => [ "votes.created_by=?", whodunnit ] }) do chosen_answers.find :all end end end Its somewhat of a contrived example, but I''m trying to understand if/how it can work. If i try: p=Person.find :first p.chosen_answers.my_answers( Perso...

>From what i can gather the with_scope feature doesn''t allow you to specify which columns get selected. It appears to default to "*". So if i specify something like: Question.with_scope( :find => { :from => "questions q, answers a", :conditions => "q.owner = a.owner AND a.owner=1" }...

Has anyone successfully gotten the scoped_access[1] plugin to work in Rails 1.1? Some of the methods it was relying on are now no longer accessible. It seems the only way to add scope is to use the ''with_scope'' method that takes a block, but since Rails doesn''t have real around filters[2] I cannot see a way of adding a scope using a filter. Anyone using with_scope and filters that can shed any light? Cheers, Jon [1] http://habtm.com/articles/2006/02/22/nested-with_scope [2] &quot...

...s a security check that enforce a simple spec: normal user should read/write information only about their group''s users, but "admin" users can read/write about all users. The other controller is quite similar, just on another model. trying to refactor a was reading about using a with_scope in an around_filter. this seems to work and the code gets a lot smaller. But it seems to be a deprecated practice... What is the "rails way" to accomplish this? thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. T...

..._start_tag, named_route_url...) to get the mapping to pick up the custom URL parameter. Having to remember to append :short_name=>@my_object.short_name (with or without to_param magic), is getting annoying and the repetition is getting ugly. Is there anything like ActiveRecord''s with_scope function to "bind" this extra parameter once and make ActionController smart about propagating the extra parameter everywhere? Thank you. Eric

Why does with_scope work with .create, .find, but not with .new? It breaks all scaffolded code :( -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi all ! Is this supposed to work ? class Email < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :to, :class_name => 'Recipient', :conditions => "recipients.source = 'to'" do def create!(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do super end end def build(*args) with_scope(:create => {:source => 'to'}) do super end end end end From my tests, if I call Email.to.create!, the recipient model correctly has it's sour...

If with_scope has been called previously, how do I access the find conditions dynamically? I am asking because I am using a find_by_sql call (which clobbers the with_scope). How can I access the method scoping so that I can read it and incorporate it into my query manually? --~--~---------~--~----~----------...

is there a way to always eagerly load an associated object so that you don''t have to put :include into every finder? class Product <ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :user #always load user when product is loaded end Product.find(1).user.login #1 query since user was loaded with the product, same as if i used :include but I don''t want to have to specify it everywhere.

...of this message for getting it.) ABOUT THE PLUGIN It extends ActionController to add the functionnality of having filters run at the action call time. This new type of filter yields when the action has to be performed. Especially, it enables one to use all the power of the ActiveRecord::Base.with_scope class method in actions. For example (in a controller definition): before_filter :authenticate # Sets @user to the logged in user meantime_filter :scope_to_user, :only => :list # Displays the posts of @user only. def list @posts = Post.find(:all) end private def scope_to_user...

How do I select a radio button when both id and name are identical?: <input type="radio" name="BILFPB.bilPremieUppgifterFI.under24" tabindex="13" value="J24" checked="checked" id="forare">Ja <input type="radio" name="BILFPB.bilPremieUppgifterFI.under24" tabindex="14" value="N24"

In a Rails controller I set the scope on a model class in an around filter. I have defined expectations on the model classes, and ideally, I would add a further expectation for the scope. Is this already possible in some way? How would I go about adding support a scope expectation? Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:michael at schuerig.de http://www.schuerig.de/michael/

There are a number of good authentication frameworks for rails - has anyone developed a generic authorization framework? I''m thinking of something that included the concept of roles, mapped roles to both actions and users and could be used to wrap actions before their invocation. Extra good would be some way to check data permissions (as in, "yes you can perform the ''Edit

Hi! I''m trying to extend ActiveRecord''s find method (Rails 1.0, Ruby 1.8.2), but I recognize a strange behaviour of the "alias_method" call. I wrote a very simple script to explain my problem: ------------------------------------------------------ module ActiveRecordExtension def self.included(base) base.extend(ClassMethods) base.class_eval do

...of the access control systems out there to limit access to the controllers. However, with 9 different controllers this seems like a terrible choice. Here''s what I''ve come up with. Each controller implements something like the following code. Basically, there''s a set_x_with_scope method which takes normal find() parameters, then passes them to X.find within X.with_scope. So, instead of having @category = Category.find(param[:id]), which would occur multiple times in the controller, I use set_category_with_scope(params[:id]), which sets @category and only allows access to...