Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "with_message".
Did you mean:
switch_message
2007 May 05
10
have_one and have_present
>Comment By: Luis Lavena (luislavena)
> Date: 2007-05-04 23:37
> describe "An Asset" do
> before(:each) do
> @asset = Asset.new
> end
>
> it { @asset.should have_one(:attachment) }
> it { @asset.should have_present(:something) }
> end
Food for thought on these. I like have_one a lot. It speaks to me as a
Rails developer and I think it speaks to
2012 Jan 19
0
Problem in testing with separate validation of :attachment_file_name
...e Example do
it { should validate_attachment_presence(:attachment) }
it { should validate_format_of(:attachment_file_name).
with(''example.png'') }
it { should validate_format_of(:attachment_file_name).
not_with(''example.zip'').
with_message(/is invalid/) }
end
This causes my validates_attachment_presence(:attachment) test to fail.
If I remove the validates_format_of :attachment_file_name line from my
model, the presence test now passes, but, obviously, the format test
fails.
I noticed that basically all validates_attachment_presenc...
2007 May 31
28
Another attempt for a succinct model validation DSL
On 5/28/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote:
> The behaviour you''re trying to describe is that the User should
> require that passwords bear certain qualities - in this case a length
> between 5 and 40. So you need to ask yourself how the User should
> behave when this requirement is violated, and then specify that it
> behaves that way.
>
>