search for: wirthout

> *nod*. That's most of what we needed for ARM as well. Should probably > conditionalize it on os darwin for now until it's tested more with a > command line? I'd almost prefer to leave it in for the bugs to be discovered (perhaps after some simple tests of our own). ARM went wirthout FastISel support on Linux for years simply because it was declared Darwin-only. Tim.

...2014 at 1:01 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 31 March 2014 20:55, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'd almost prefer to leave it in for the bugs to be discovered > > (perhaps after some simple tests of our own). ARM went wirthout > > FastISel support on Linux for years simply because it was declared > > Darwin-only. > > Given the unique opportunity we have now, I'd say we should at least > give it a try. > I'm not sure I understand what you're proposing: check in with FastISel turned on...

...olin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: >> >> On 31 March 2014 20:55, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: >> > I'd almost prefer to leave it in for the bugs to be discovered >> > (perhaps after some simple tests of our own). ARM went wirthout >> > FastISel support on Linux for years simply because it was declared >> > Darwin-only. >> >> Given the unique opportunity we have now, I'd say we should at least >> give it a try. > > > I'm not sure I understand what you're proposing: chec...

> There's already a working fast isel port as well. Though I'm not sure > how well tested that's been on linux. > > Tim? I've not tested FastISel on Linux at all, I'm afraid. In theory I'd expect only minor modifications to be necessary (around global variable materialisation, if anywhere). Cheers. Tim.