search for: wipo

...r the following, lend your signatures, and also *send it on* to appropriate interested parties. If you are a blogger or know clueful bloggers, please try to have it posted in a highly visible forum. -- Seth Johnson) Hello folks, Please review the important joint statement below, related to the WIPO Broadcaster's Treaty, and consider adding your signature if you are an American citizen. Also make sure those you know who should sign are also given the opportunity. Andy Oram has written a good letter to the US Delegation to WIPO on the subject: > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/etel/200...

...VOIP Spam is actually pretty trivial to take care of, if only the manufacturers would wise up. We're in the same place we were with SMTP about twelve years ago. I'm sure we'll see a slew of patents and chest-pounding by people with obvious or trivial solutions - welcome to the New WIPO World. The solution is simple: "End devices should have the option to only accept authenticated requests." That's pretty simple, but that is the key to the whole solution. However, most end devices will blindly accept any call that they're given, so long as the destination nu...

On 01/18/15 03:45, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/18/2015 02:14 AM, Mark LaPierre wrote: >> On 01/15/15 22:55, Darr247 wrote: >>> On 16 January 2015 @00:34 zulu, Digimer wrote: >>>> So either the link should be changed or the linked page should be >>>> updated. >>>> >>> >>> Well, until someone rewrites the redhat docs so they

Hello, I am relatively new to Asterisk and I need to compile the G.723.1 codec for Asterisk. I downloaded the ITU source code, placed it in the codecs directory, but apparently Asterisk needs a rather different library than the one provided from ITU. As I've seen in the mailing list archives, there are quite a few users who were able to compile G.723.1 in *, so, could someone kindly share it

...and paste. Unless you get RH's permission in writing to do so, in advance, I'm pretty-sure copy and paste does not meet the "so it doesn't violate copyright law" criterion I mentioned earlier. Even if you're not doing it for any type of monetary gain... the DMCA and WIPO loom large.

I found an old ROM BIOS chip in my drawer with label Centos(r) Copyright 1994 on it. Then I found http://www.centos.com.tw/ on the net. Has anyone checked if you can use the name centos without any fear of litigation? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070101/3918e0cc/attachment-0001.html>

Hello! Using 2.3-kh2 I wasn't able to make fallback work. This is what I am using: ... <mount> <max-listeners>2</max-listeners> <mount-name>/black.ogg</mount-name> </mount> <mount> <max-listeners>2</max-listeners> <mount-name>/live.ogg</mount-name>

...you get RH's permission in writing to do so, in advance, I'm >pretty-sure copy and paste does not meet the "so it doesn't violate >copyright law" criterion I mentioned earlier. > >Even if you're not doing it for any type of monetary gain... the DMCA >and WIPO loom large. >_______________________________________________ >CentOS mailing list >CentOS at centos.org >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos