search for: wint

...time-at-depth (TAD) frequency data that I would like some help with. The data was transmitted via satellite as percent time spent in each of 7 depth bins (0m, 0-1m, 1-10m, 10-50m etc.), binned over 6-hour intervals. I categorized each row of data corresponding to a date and time into summer vs. winter, and day vs. night, and then summed and averaged the given % for each depth bin. My data looks like this (for one individual, HG03): HG03.dat Season Time Depth Sum Avrg 1 summ day 0 17.2 0.1702970 2 summ day 1 23.9 0.2366337 3 summ day 10 868.5 8....

...XP and 2000 Clients. But if i try to access such a file from a linux-box, I cannot read this files. I switched to the german charset with EURO Sign but no success. Then i tried the cifs instead of smbfs. But the same effect. Switching to UTF-8 doesn't work too. Example: -------- The "wint<EUROSIGN>uro.txt" file was created on a WindowsXP Workstation. All other files are created from the Linuxbox with writeaccess to the WindowsXP PC. mount -t cifs //192.168.9.115/Xchange /mnt/test -o codepage=cp850,iocharset=iso8859-15,unixcharset=iso8859-15 [root@foobar ]# ls -lah /mn...

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive than

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote: > gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool > is confusing: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> wrote: >>> In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive >>> than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up >>> the warning. To further improve

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] Adding a temporary variable to contain the divisor helps make it clear what is

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] Adding a temporary variable to contain the divisor helps make it clear what is

Dear sirs/madams, I am using smbmount (mount -t smbfs) version 2.2.8a for mounting shares from a Windows 2003 server on a Linux machine. This works fine, but there seems to be a security problem; ordinary users can write to files, even when the Unix protection does not allow this. The user cannot remove the file or create a new one, but can do what he/she wants with an existing one. Is this a

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Karol Herbst <karolherbst at gmail.com> wrote: >> In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive >> than '&&', so I'm adding a comparison to zero instead to shut up >> the warning. To further improve readability, I also make the >> error case indented and leave the normal case as the final

...ull-x86_64/x86_64: /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); ^ /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:54:27: error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsign...

gcc thinks that interpreting a multiplication result as a bool is confusing: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c: In function 'read_pll': drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:133:8: error: '*' in boolean context, suggest '&&' instead [-Werror=int-in-bool-context] In this instance, I think using multiplication is more intuitive than

...--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->--- radixsort.c:1643:10: warning: implicit declaration of function ?DATAPTR? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] xd = DATAPTR(x); ^ radixsort.c:1643:8: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] xd = DATAPTR(x); ^ radixsort.c:1735:5: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] xd = DATAPTR(x); ---<--------------------cut here---------------end--------------------->--- which eventually cause the build to fail completely...

...le_execute_stack.o /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); Thanks Pranav On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > Hi Pranav, > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Pranav Garg <pranav.garg2107 at gmail.co...

...on of function 'getenv' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > if (!(e = getenv("LISTEN_PID"))) { > ^ > sd-daemon.c:56:17: warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'const char *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] > if (!(e = getenv("LISTEN_PID"))) { > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > sd-daemon.c:62:13: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strtoul' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > l = strtoul(e, &p, 10); >...

.../x86_64: /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c > /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' > [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] > unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); > ^ > /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:54:27: error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer t...

...v/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c > > > /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: > error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' > > [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] > > unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); > > ^ > > > /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:54:27: > error: cast to 'unsigned char *...

...k-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c >> >> /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: >> error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' >> [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] >> unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); >> > > Hm... Is it true that somewhy on your system (32-bit host, I presume), > sizeof(uintptr_t) != sizeof(unsigned char *) when you build code in 64-bit > mode (with -m64)? >...

...home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c > > /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: > error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' > [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] > unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); > Hm... Is it true that somewhy on your system (32-bit host, I presume), sizeof(uintptr_t) != sizeof(unsigned char *) when you build code in 64-bit mode (with -m64)? > > > Thanks > Pr...

...sers' side. What does it > bring except longer code to read? Because the argument is an int: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ahb.c: In function ?ath_ahb_probe?: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/ahb.c:141:18: warning: passing argument 1 of ?ioread32? makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] reg = ioread32(AR5K_AR2315_AHB_ARB_CTL); Best regards, Krzysztof

...llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c >> > >> /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:53:29: >> error: cast to 'unsigned char *' from smaller integer type 'unsigned int' >> > [-Werror,-Wint-to-pointer-cast] >> > unsigned char* startPage = (unsigned char*)(p & pageAlignMask); >> > ^ >> > >> /home/pranav/smack-project/llvm/src/projects/compiler-rt/lib/enable_execute_stack.c:54:27: >> error: cast to ...