search for: winnowed

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:39 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:30:09PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > > On 2/9/20 2:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should >

On 2/9/20 2:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > never do something different based on this. > Should we follow that line of reasoning further, and simply return void from the debugfs functions--rather than playing whack-a-mole with this

Thank you. Unfortunately, I bit more than I can swallow. I redirected the output of strace to a file, but it has more than 22k lines. How do I sensibly winnow that down? I have never used strace before and the output is overwhelming. Alternatively/additionally, is there something similar for windows, which I can use to check what happens under windows, with a functioning copy of the program I am

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 02:30:09PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote: > On 2/9/20 2:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the > > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should > > never do something different based on this. > > > > Should we follow that line of reasoning further, and

Using Centos 5.2 and the "Software Updater/Package Updater/pup", I winnowed the problem updates down to six packages: 1: Updated file packages available 2: Updated gcc43 packages available 3: Updated gcc packages available 4: Updated pam packages available 5: Updated redhat-logos packages available 6: Updated redhat-menus packages available It'd rea...

Hi All, I am trying to use the C50 package to build classification trees in R. Unfortunately there is not enought documentation around its use. Can anyone explain to me - how to prune the decision trees? Regards, Indrajit [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I've got a complicated semi-parametric model that I'm fitting with mgcv. I start with a model based on theory. Its got lots of interaction terms. I want to winnow it down: removing each interaction term or un-interacted main effect one by one, checking the AIC, and retaining the model that gives me the lowest AIC. I then want to repeat the procedure on the retained model. Here is

I've been banging my head on this for several hours, and I have no idea what's going on. Maybe there is a very simple result, and I've been looking too hard at this this evening. This is a brand new system, and I'm wondering if there have been SIP bugs introduced in the latest CVS that are preventing from working what should be a stupendously simple test. - Cisco 7960

Hey, I'm going thru logs, and I see some very common and interesting things that the hackers are looking for. In a whole bunch of scans, I've noticed that the first guess or two for sip accounts is usually a 10-digit number. I'm asking myself, why these numbers? Are they looking for a voip trunk? Or is it just like a serial number for the scan? What? Here's some examples:

When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

...tand redhat's bugzilla -- there's an approx 10-character wide box for reporting the bug and it always claims that that's not a bug. I'm sure I'm missing something. Anyway, here's the problems: Using Centos 5.2 and the "Software Updater/Package Updater/pup", I winnowed the problem updates down to six packages: 1: Updated file packages available 2: Updated gcc43 packages available 3: Updated gcc packages available 4: Updated pam packages available 5: Updated redhat-logos packages available 6: Updated redhat-menus packages available I set it up...

Not sure if anybody noticed, but it seems like Skype For Asterisk is out. $66 per channels, pretty pricey http://store.digium.com/productview.php?product_code=1SFA0001 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090817/cd8c6546/attachment.htm

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 Andreas Kotes <count-mindrot at flatline.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |count-mindrot at flatline.de Severity|normal |major --- Comment #6 from

Hello World, I am a newcomer to this technology. I am very pleased to have found it and VERY interested in using it, as a better-cost alternative for schools where I teach open source & Windows technology. I travel the world, and help set up schools in underprivileged countries where it is very expensive to acquire the Windows desktop. Wine seems like a VERY good solution, much better than

Hi, Can anyone guide me in building the lustre using pre-packaged lustre release.I''m using Ubuntu 7.10 I want to build lustre using RHEL2.6 rpms available on my system.I''m referring how_to in wiki. but in that no detailed step by step procedure is given for building lustre using pre-packed release. I''m in need of this. Thanks and Regards, Ashok Bharat -----Original

Hi all, I have a package that is specific to a task I was repetitively using a few years ago. I now needed to run it again with new data. However I am told it was built with an older version or R and will not work. How can I tweak the package so it will run on 11.1? It was a one-off product and has not been maintained. Is there a way to "unpackage" it and repackage it to work? I

I'm using caret to assess classifier performance (and it's great!). However, I've found that my results differ between R2.* and R3.* - reported accuracies are reduced dramatically. I suspect that a code change to kernlab ksvm may be responsible (see version 5.16-24 here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/news.html). I get very different results between caret_5.15-61 +

Hi I am setting up a phone system for a small office. The office will have 5-8 phones and a fax line. There are 4 hunt lines coming into the office. We have made no hardware purchase yet. Being an asterisk newbie, before I suscribed to this list I just assumed that I would buy voip phones and connect all the phones to a private ethernet network. However, I see many people inquiring about FXS

V; Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -----Original Message----- From: r-help-request at r-project.org Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:00:06 To: <r-help at r-project.org> Subject: R-help Digest, Vol 67, Issue 31 Send R-help mailing list submissions to r-help at r-project.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help or, via email,