Displaying 20 results from an estimated 27 matches for "winell".
2017 Apr 12
3
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
The last line of the example in droplevels' manual page seems to be incorrect to me. I think it should read: "table(droplevels(aq$Month))". Amazingly (I don't understand) both variants seem to produce the same result (R 3.3.3):
---
> aq <- transform(airquality, Month = factor(Month, labels = month.abb[5:9]))
> aq <- subset(aq, Month != "Jul")
>
2017 Apr 12
2
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
Hello,
Inline.
Em 12-04-2017 16:40, Henric Winell escreveu:
> (Let's keep the discussion on-list -- I've added back R-devel.)
>
> On 2017-04-12 16:39, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>
>>>>> Henric Winell <nilsson.henric at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.04.2017
>>>>> um 15:35 in
>> Nachricht <b66fe84...
2017 Feb 07
2
package load altering RNG state
>>>>> Henric Winell <nilsson.henric at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Tue, 7 Feb 2017 13:37:42 +0100 writes:
> Hi, On 2017-02-07 13:12, Benjamin Tyner wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> When loading a package, I'm wondering if it's frowned
>> upon for the pack...
2015 Oct 21
2
rank(, ties.method="last")
...> x <- c(1, 1, 2, 3)
> > rank2(x, ties.method = "last")
> [1] 1 2 4 3
>
> That doesn't look right to me -- I had expected
>
> > rev(sort.list(x, decreasing = TRUE))
> [1] 2 1 3 4
>
Indeed, well spotted, that seems to be correct.
>
> Henric Winell
>
------------------------------
In the particular example (of length 4), what is really wanted is the following.
ind <- integer(4)
ind[sort.list(x, decreasing=TRUE)] <- 4:1
ind
The following gives the desired result:
sort.list(rev(sort.list(x, decreasing=TRUE)))
2017 Apr 13
0
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
>>>>> Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas at sapo.pt>
>>>>> on Wed, 12 Apr 2017 17:07:45 +0100 writes:
> Hello, Inline.
> Em 12-04-2017 16:40, Henric Winell escreveu:
>> (Let's keep the discussion on-list -- I've added back
>> R-devel.)
>>
>> On 2017-04-12 16:39, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>
>>>>> Henric Winell <nilsson.henric at gmail.com> schrieb am
>> 12.04.2017
>...
2014 Mar 06
2
'parallel' package changes '.Random.seed'
...rsion of my package can no
longer reproduce any subsequent results depending on random number
generation (unless a call to 'set.seed' was issued *after* attaching my
package).
I'd be most grateful for any help that you're able to provide here.
Many thanks!
Kind regards,
Henric Winell
> sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2014-01-26 r64897)
Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
[3] LC_TIME=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
[5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
[7] LC_PAPER=e...
2017 Apr 12
0
"table(droplevels(aq)$Month)" in manual page of droplevels
(Let's keep the discussion on-list -- I've added back R-devel.)
On 2017-04-12 16:39, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>>> Henric Winell <nilsson.henric at gmail.com> schrieb am 12.04.2017
>>>> um 15:35 in
> Nachricht <b66fe849-bb8d-f00d-87e5-553f866d57e0 at gmail.com>:
>> On 2017-04-12 14:40, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>
>>> The last line of the example in droplevels' manual page seems...
2017 Feb 07
2
package load altering RNG state
Hello
When loading a package, I'm wondering if it's frowned upon for the
package to alter the state of the random number generator? I guess not,
since the parallel package does it?
> set.seed(6860)
> old.seed <- .GlobalEnv$.Random.seed
> library(parallel)
> new.seed <- .GlobalEnv$.Random.seed
> identical(old.seed, new.seed)
[1] FALSE
I ask
2015 Oct 22
1
(no subject)
------------------
>>>>> Henric Winell <[hidden email]>
>>>>> on Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:43:02 +0200 writes:
> Den 2015-10-21 kl. 07:24, skrev Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel:
>> Marius Hofert-4------------------------------
>>> Den 2015-10-09 kl. 12:14, skrev Martin Maechl...
2015 Oct 08
3
rank(, ties.method="last")
Hi,
I ran into a problem where I actually need rank(, ties.method="last"). It would
be great to have this feature in base and it's also simple to get (see below).
Thanks & cheers,
Marius
rank2 <- function (x, na.last = TRUE, ties.method = c("average",
"first", "last", # new "last"
"random", "max",
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here:
$ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16
> ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects
> d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1
> tools::assertError(format(d))
> d$zone <- NULL
> stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06"))
> d$zone <- "CET" # =
2017 May 17
2
R-3.4.0 fails test
After installing R-3.4.0 I ran 'make check' which halted here:
$ > tail reg-tests-1d.Rout.fail -n 16
> ## format()ing invalid hand-constructed POSIXlt objects
> d <- as.POSIXlt("2016-12-06"); d$zone <- 1
> tools::assertError(format(d))
> d$zone <- NULL
> stopifnot(identical(format(d),"2016-12-06"))
> d$zone <- "CET" # =
2015 Oct 20
0
rank(, ties.method="last")
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Henric Winell
<nilsson.henric at gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 2015-10-09 kl. 12:14, skrev Martin Maechler:
> I think so: the code above doesn't seem to do the right thing. Consider
> the following example:
>
> > x <- c(1, 1, 2, 3)
> > rank2(x, ties.method = "last")
&g...
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all,
I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step
by step.
When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have
"segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R
interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time.
My questions are:
1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula?
2. Why does the
2012 Aug 09
4
debug vs regular mode
Dear all,
I had a R segmentation fault, and then invoked debug mode and ran step
by step.
When I reached "terms(Y~X1*X2*...*X16)", I would then have
"segmentation" fault. However, if I just ran this under regular "R
interactive" mode, it would be fine though taking long time.
My questions are:
1. Is there a known limit of terms for a formula?
2. Why does the
2017 Feb 07
0
package load altering RNG state
...ome such a feature to be added to
> base R? Either something very general like
>
> preserveRNGstate(library(parallel))
>
> or perhaps an specific enhancement to library itself?
I would very much welcome a change, but in the light of things it
doesn't seem likely.
Henric Winell
>
> Regards
> Ben
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
2018 Jun 14
0
makeCluster Stall on 32-bit Windows
...m using the necessary
ports (11000-11999). Upon first use on a freshly installed 64-bit W10 a
window pops-up -- "Windows Firewall has blocked this app", or something
like that -- where you can allow access. As long as this window is
open, the command prompt is not returned.
Henric Winell
P.S. This topic is probably not appropriate for R-devel and follow-ups
should likely be directed to R-help instead. D.S.
> R version 3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
> Platform: i386-w64-mingw32/i386 (32-bit)
> Running under: Windows >= 8 (build 9200)
>
> Matrix products: default
>...
2018 Jun 14
2
makeCluster Stall on 32-bit Windows
Good day,
I'm trying the example cl <- makeCluster(2, type = "SOCK") from the makeCluster documentation and the R command prompt never returns. I am using a 32-bit Windows 10 computer. The problem doesn't happen on another 64-bit Windows 10 computer but does happen on another 32-bit Windows 7 computer. Can anyone reproduce it? Are there any other options that can be passed to
2013 Jun 03
2
installing package 'rqpd' (Regression quantiles for panel data)
Hello R community members,
I'm trying to install the 'rqpd' package which is developed by Roger
Koenker and Stefan Bache. When I try to install the package using the
command 'install.packages("rqpd",repos="http://R-Forge.R-project.org")'
I'm getting the following two messages:
i) package ?rqpd? is available as a source package but not as a binary
2015 Jan 12
0
New version of Rtools for Windows
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 10:56 AM, Henric Winell wrote:
>> On 2015-01-08 02:31, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/01/2015 5:20 PM, Jeroen Ooms wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This version includes only...