search for: windowssupport

...hould definitely get a note into the weekly update. We may also want to get it into the 3.7 release notes as a warning to users. I suspect we're in a position to make the switch now. As for the mechanics, I'm less certain of all the places we have to touch, but intuition suggests cmake and WindowsSupport.h. ~Aaron > Thanks! > -Greg > > On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as the baseline. >> >> 2015年7月14日(火) 7:48 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: >>>...

Ah, I see this was addressed in 250386 - though might be nice to address across the whole project rather than this particular inclusion. Though maybe we've few enough inclusions that it's not too bad. On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 2:51 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 2:17 AM, David Majnemer via llvm-commits < > llvm-commits at

...ote into the weekly update. We may > also want to get it into the 3.7 release notes as a warning to users. > > I suspect we're in a position to make the switch now. As for the > mechanics, I'm less certain of all the places we have to touch, but > intuition suggests cmake and WindowsSupport.h. > > ~Aaron > > > Thanks! > > -Greg > > > > On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> +1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as the baseline. > >> > >> 2015年7月14日(火) 7:48 Aaron Ba...

...update. We may >> also want to get it into the 3.7 release notes as a warning to users. >> >> I suspect we're in a position to make the switch now. As for the >> mechanics, I'm less certain of all the places we have to touch, but >> intuition suggests cmake and WindowsSupport.h. >> >> ~Aaron >> >> > Thanks! >> > -Greg >> > >> > On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> +1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as the baseline. >> >> &...

...gt;> also want to get it into the 3.7 release notes as a warning to users. >>> >>> I suspect we're in a position to make the switch now. As for the >>> mechanics, I'm less certain of all the places we have to touch, but >>> intuition suggests cmake and WindowsSupport.h. >>> >>> ~Aaron >>> >>> > Thanks! >>> > -Greg >>> > >>> > On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA Takumi <geek4civic at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> +1. We may focus Windows 7...

It sounds like there are no objections to jumping to Windows 7 as the baseline. Is it worth getting a note added to the next LLVM weekly to give the potential change a bit of a wider viewership before going ahead with it or are we in a position to just do this now? If so, what are the actual mechanics of the change, and who'd like to do it? Thanks! -Greg On 14 July 2015 at 06:55, NAKAMURA

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > (cc'ing the new list address; sorry for the duplicate) > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> Did we conclude that we've dropped Win XP support now? I believe we have, yes. ~Aaron >> >> If so, I'll stop

+1. We may focus Windows 7, aka NT6.1, as the baseline. 2015年7月14日(火) 7:48 Aaron Ballman <aaron at aaronballman.com>: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > Nobody objected to raising the bar, so I think we can go ahead and do > this. > > Keeping the XP support until 3.7 ships seems reasonable as it's less > >