search for: windowshap

>Theory is.. You can only shape outbound traffic. Inbound is via tcp windowshaping etc.. In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 65437 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT...

...l can''t really be achieved without losing bandwidth. In some of the howtos'' I''ve read, one guy had to limit his downspeed to 1/2 his bandwidth to actually control it. And he was saying that the only way to actually efficiently control inbound traffic control is to use TCP windowshaping which there is not an oss implementation of it. Can anyone please shed light on this? FWIW, this discussion was in http://my-opensource.org/lists/myoss/2004-07/msg00051.html http://my-opensource.org/lists/myoss/2004-06/msg00167.html http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/2004-July/msg0149...

Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the

...lly be achieved without losing >bandwidth. >In some of the howtos'' I''ve read, one guy had to limit his downspeed to >1/2 his bandwidth to actually control it. And he was saying that the >only way to actually efficiently control inbound traffic control is to >use TCP windowshaping which there is not an oss implementation of it. > >Can anyone please shed light on this? > > The issue is not as alarming as you think. The point is that there is a buffer on the ISP end. If this buffer fills up then the algorithm is usually first in first out. ie you have no...

>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine