search for: windows_lock

...28, 5] smbd/uid.c:change_to_user(322) change_to_user uid=(0,1007) gid=(0,1003) [2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(98) is_locked: optimisation - exclusive oplock on file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX [2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(136) is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=0 len=12 unlocked for fnum 6473 file ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX [2009/10/19 14:45:28, 10] smbd/fileio.c:read_file(104) read_file (ACE/TIKKLOK/PCBNR.NTX): pos = 0, size = 12, returned 12 [2009/10/19 14:45:28, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_read(3123) read fnum=6473 num=12 nread=12 [2009/10/19 14...

...1,2,3,4,10/ris.2.1.Tekt.wmf [2008/11/19 11:32:28, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(137) is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=330004 len=24 unlocked for fnum 5756 file ????????????? ??? ???/??????????/???????? ???????-2005?/Podschet_Sos n_ispr_2005/??? I. ?????1 ?????. ?????.????/??????? ? ??.1,2,3,4,10/ris.2.1.Tekt.wmf [2008/11/19 11:32:2...

...P/SP2. Seems to loose the connection before setting the bit and a new smbd is spawn. Daniel [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(96) is_locked: optimisation - exclusive oplock on file Dev/Inst.ism [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(134) is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=0 len=5429 unlocked for fnum 10866 file Dev/Inst.ism [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(326) dos_mode: Dev/Inst.ism [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(193) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning [2006/07/05 09:32:36, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(364) dos_mo...

hi everybody I'm hoping some experts could shed a bit more light on the subject I cannot work it out and it's potentially quite a hassle win xp sp3 client samba 3.2.7 on sles 11 samba 3.5.10 on rhel 6.1 and one app the the front end to a user, that does not write anything back to the resure this is what I think goes on: 3.5 somehow denies some sort of locking to the client if the

...Lock query call successful [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 10] locking/brlock.c:1270(brl_locktest) brl_locktest: posix start=4729736 len=242 unlocked for fnum 5219 file doc2/daten/deziff/EBM2000/ziffer.DBF [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 10] locking/locking.c:152(strict_lock_default) strict_lock_default: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=4729736 len=242 unlocked for fnum 5219 file doc2/daten/deziff/EBM2000/ziffer.DBF [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 10] locking/posix.c:284(is_posix_locked) is_posix_locked: File doc2/daten/deziff/EBM2000/ziffer.DBF, offset = 4729978, count = 242, type = READ [2010/03/05 20:04:30, 10] locking/posix....

....file, fd = 26, dev = 15, inode12620340. (Resource temporarily unavailable) [2007/01/02 18:39:10, 10] locking/brlock.c:brl_locktest(1066) brl_locktest: posix start=0 len=12785 locked for fnum 10883 file this.file [2007/01/02 18:39:10, 10] locking/locking.c:is_locked(134) is_locked: flavour = WINDOWS_LOCK brl start=0 len=12785 locked for fnum 10883 file this.file [2007/01/02 18:39:10, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(146) error packet at smbd/reply.c(3098) cmd=47 (SMBwriteX) NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT Now what's interesting is that I can create a new file on the share from windows explorers...

Dear all, I have set up a two node workin gluster with glusterfs3.1 and Samba-Sernet 3.5. Everything is working great except MSOffice files (Word/Excell). On the gluster-vol they have the strange behavior That they rest read only, write protected. Every other type of files can be manged without problem, openoffice files too. So when I save a word file on the vol and try to change it it is write

Hi, I've noticed that over a WAN (T1) I'm getting incredibly slow file copy performance. Using smbclient on a linux machine on one size of the WAN, As you can imagine, this makes all of our file shares unusable over the WAN. It's not an issue with WAN performance, because using scp to transfer the same file, I get speeds of ~145k/s. A tcpdump of the file copy of ~2MB file that actually