search for: win95machin

Hi I have two different distributions running, RedHat 6.0 and Slackware 7.0. Both machines are running Samba 2.05a. When I try the smbmount command on the RedHat machine, it has no problem mounting the smb service. RedHat 6.0: works: smbmount //win95machine/c /mnt/c failed: smbmount "\\win95\c" -c `mount /mnt/c -u 123 -g 456` Slacware 7.0: failed: smbmount //win95machine/c /mnt/c failed: smbmount "\\win95\c" -c `mount /mnt/c -u 123 -g 456` Error Msg: Device does not exist. The SmbClient -L host works fine on both distri...

On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Jones, Rich wrote: > RedHat 6.0: > works: smbmount //win95machine/c /mnt/c > failed: smbmount "\\win95\c" -c `mount /mnt/c -u 123 -g 456` > > Slacware 7.0: > failed: smbmount //win95machine/c /mnt/c > failed: smbmount "\\win95\c" -c `mount /mnt/c -u 123 -g 456` > > Error Msg: Device does not exis...

Hi, I've set up my smb.conf file with individual entries for the printers that I want to share out to Win95 / NT clients. I've also got 'load printers = no' specified in smb.conf, and the default 'printers' section commented out entirely. Firstly; I still get a 'Printers' system folder when brosing the linux machine from an NT client running windows explorer - is

...> Subject: Re: 'automatic' Printer driver installation... > Message-ID: <3783C14D.6CECBA03@dds.nl> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Hai, > > doesn't use win 95 a hidden share like: \\win95machine\printer$ > (watch the '$' at the end of printer$) > I think this is a major security hole in windows, > I gues you should only see printer drivers in here, and not the whole > \windows\system directory. > > Ries > > ------------------------------ > > Date:...