search for: win95b

...or higher, the problem does not occur due to the speed drop! I'm using this for amanda, so this is not a viable option. Any takers? Thanks Daren Schwenke Imageware Corp. I get the following errors (error reading file errors...) smb :\ tar c /home/darens/testt.tar directory \Win95B\ 496 ( 17.3 kb/s) \Win95B\DELTEMP.COM 72358 ( 2018.9 kb/s) \Win95B\DOSSETUP.BIN 46656 ( 1340.1 kb/s) \Win95B\EXTRACT.EXE 49543 ( 1240.6 kb/s) \Win95B\FORMAT.COM 54600 ( 2539.1 kb/s) \Win95B\LAYOUT.INF Error reading file \Win95B\LAYOUT1.INF. Got 0 bytes Didn't get en...

I have noticed a very strange problem on a base Windows 95b computer. On a clean win95b computer with no additional software, the drive mappings in the logon scripts fail. The logon script uses 'net use' to connect the client to a share on the samba server. The server is running RH7.1 and Samba 2.2.2. The samba server is setup as a domain appliance and uses winbind, passing...

Hi, I have recently upgraded hardware and now have a run-time error with R62.3 when I have built it from scratch with EGCS 1.1 (Guido's original binaries run OK). (333MHzK2, 64MBRam, 1.5GBHD, Win95b). Anyone any ideas ? R : Copyright 1998, The R Development Core Team Version 0.62.3 Beta (Sept 8, 1998) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions. Type "?license" or "?licence" for distribution de...

...e directory containing the batch file, not the current directory. cmd: Size buffer in create_full_path() correctly. reg.exe: Handle setting DWORD registry values. Detlef Riekenberg (14): wine.inf: Add a 16bit fake dll for ddeml.dll. shlwapi/tests: ChrCmpI* is not present on Win95B (winetestbot). shlwapi/tests: HashData is not present on Win95B (winetestbot). shlwapi/tests: PathCreateFromUrl* is not present on Win95B (winetestbot). shlwapi/tests: UrlApplyScheme* is not present on Win95B (winetestbot). shlwapi/tests: UrlCanonicalize* is not present on W...

...takes no time at all (500kb/sec). I would say it takes about 10 times as long to unzip when run directly from the samba share. This happens will all self-extracting exe files, and also from any share that I create. Any clues? The samba server is running 1.9.17p4 on FreeBSD (486dx4), the client is Win95b on a P133, and I have a very standard and basic smb.conf (sorry, I couldn't send it right now). I'll send more details if anyone has any ideas. Thanks, Jeff Bond --------------------------------------------------- Jeffery Bond <mailto:jeffbond@compuserve.com> <http://ourworld.c...

...ello everybody, today I had some time to test Peter´s decoding plugin on a very slow machine. My setup: - Pentium "classic" @ 50 MHz (underclocked!) - Mainboard with Mercury Chipset (I think) - CD-ROM and HDD in PIO-Mode (CPU intensive) - MAD16 Soundcard (ISA slot, CPU intensive) - Win95B, Winamp 2.76, Decoder Plugin 1.16 (RC 2) The hardware setup is something like the "worst case possible" as data transfer is CPU intensive (PIO mode IDE, ISA soundcard), the FSB is only 50 MHz (so Cache, Memory and PCI are slow, too) and the CPU is underclocked (there never was a 50 MHz P...

Howdy all: I'm trying to use smbmount to mount a win9x share and copy some files for backup, eventually to run as a script invoked via cron. I have RH6.1/samba 2.0.5a, and the windoze box is win95b. If I do the standard mount (smbmount //winbox/backup /mnt/smb04) I have to be root. Also, after it's mounted, I can't create any files there as a normal user (even though the mount-point /mnt/smb04 is owned by me). The smbmount man page says: To mount an smb file system, I suggest usin...

...re very few collisions. Well, here are the specs for my server system, and the client Linux server Linux 2.2.5 based on Slackware 3.6 distro PII 300 with 64 Meg RAM Buslogic SCSI controler with 7200RPM 9.1 G IBM disk Intel Etherexpress Pro + 10/100 (Intel 82557) Samba 2.0.3 Win 95 Client Win95b Celeron 300A with 64Meg RAM 7200 RPM IDE disk using standard GX chipset IDE controler 3Com 905b TX 10/100 NIC with v4.1 of the 3com drivers TCP/IP is the only protocal installed currently, although I also tried with the NETBEUI protocal installed, but there was no diffrence The hub is just a...

I'm running samba 2.2.4 on rh 7.2. Everything's been working well for months. I use the domain logon feature to map drives when '98 users logon to the domain. Recently I've had a couple machines refuse to process the logon script and I can't figure out why. Here's the Windows output: C:\WINDOWS> Access denied - Z:\ALEXA~03.BAT C:\WINDOWS> Access denied -

At one of our sites we have a Solaris 2.51 box running 1.9.17. All of the clients are win95B. When these users print(printing is spooled on the Solaris machine) all applications on the PC are frozen until the printing is finished. Pretty cool, but not for the users. My suspicion is that there is some information that samba is sending to the PC's that is confusing them. Any experie...

Matthew Chapman wrote: > When I mount a W95/98 drive and create or modify files, everything is > groovy. > > When I mount an NT drive and create, modify, or read files (as in, copying > them from the NT drive to my own local drive), the dates go crazy. > > Our sysadmin tells me the NT system is NT Server 4.0 Enterprise Eddition, > service pack 3. Hi, Matthew, I'am

Linux 2.2.13 Intel samba-2.0.7pre2 will Sig11 and die on me right after processing NetBIOS name = FOO in smb.conf. Not always, but sometimes I have to start smbd 2 or 3 times. It always fails there. Any reason why 2.0.7pre2 would do this, and 2.0.6 (from rpm) never did? -- Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com Network Architect mailto:ed@schernau.com Rational Computing Providence, RI,

In NT Explorer, my 9GB usr shares show up as 4GB. Any suggestions? Doug Smith

Since I get any response I try again -- hoping that somebody have ANY idea! A network with a RedHat 6.0 linux server and samba 2.0.6 and Windows 95 clients: When I for example copy large (binary?) files from local drives to one of my Samba shares I VERY often experience that the network connection to the Win95 machine crashes. The lovely Windows Blue-Screen message about an exception appears,

I have similar problem. However, I have noticed that without applying the sp3 on either NT4 workstation or Server. It seems to work fine. As soon as sp3 is applied the samba does not work. Error loggin in occurs. I remove tcpip support on nt and reinstalled, there was a conversion from winsock1.1 to winsock2.0. Also in the smb.conf there is a statement to the effect NOTCPDELAY, that word

Ok, anyone know if we're subject to the same bug as MS fixed in 95B vredir.vxd? A test, with log level 3, sound like it's in order. --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people 185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416)

pn] I'm trying to set up Samba on a Linux Red Hat 6.1 machine. Other machines on my network are NT4 and Win98. I generally followed a NHT, except that I have a domain using user-level access for shares instead of a share-level access. I couldn't get it to work, and tried diagnosing it using the document at http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/DIAGNOSIS.html. Several tests are not working as

I've got a home network with using win2k pro. Do I need to set Samba up as a pdc for the w2k machines to connect? Currently I've got my w2k machines set up as a workgroup and simply set up Samba as a member of that workgroup. My problem is that I cannot connect to it. I see my samba box in my network neighborhood, however, I cannot browse it. I'm running Samba 2.2.2 that came with

Has any tried to connect to a samba server while using Win98 beta 2 as a client? I keep getting incorrect username/password errors in the samba log file and am unable to either map a drive or connect to a shared resource. With debug level set to 4 on the samba serve the main error seems to be error in packet at line 129 for cmd=117 (or something like that). If anyone else finds a fix for this,

...om> > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > First of all, a crossover cable works just fine, provided you make > it decently. > > Leave full-duplex and auto-sensing on. > > I had similar weirdness with a Win95b client (with DUN 1.3 installed) > and a 486-33 RH 6.0 box running samba. > > Turns out that I nuked TCP/IP and reinstalled, and it is back > up to where I think it ought to be, around 300 K/sec. > > -- > Edward Schernau http://www.schernau.com > Network Architect mailto:ed@s...