Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "win32_popen".
Did you mean:
win32_open
2004 Oct 04
2
open3 for windows
Hi all,
The topic of creating a unified API for open3 for Windows came up at
RubyConf 2004 this year.
Park, I was wondering if you would mind if we modified win32_popen so that
the API matches the open3 library that ships with Ruby.
This also means deciding whether or not to leave in the open2, open4, and
posix stuff. I guess it doesn''t hurt to leave this in, although Open3.open4
seems a bit off ;) I suppose we could argue that "Open3" was...
2004 Dec 01
1
typo
In my previous mail the last line was supposed to be:
"It turns out I probably won''t use fork unless support FOR STREAMS is
added to it."
aslak
2004 Oct 05
0
C extension question
Hi all,
I was just refactoring some of the win32_popen code, and I saw this a few
times:
rb_raise(...);
return Qnil;
Is there any way it will ever reach the return? Isn''t the rb_raise() going
to return? Or is there a good reason for this? Just curious.
Dan
In the immortal words of Socrates, "I drank what?"
2004 Oct 06
0
Open3 progress
Hi all,
I''ve got an initial version of Open3.popen3 checked into CVS, along with a
test suite, a sample program and some of the usual files (README, etc).
This is just Park''s win32_popen package stripped down and modified to match
the Open3 API.
So far, so good. For the first release, I''ve decided that we should strip
it down to popen3 only. We can always add popen2 and popen4 back in later.
Also, I''ve dropped support for Win9x or ME.
What''s left?...