Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "willpow".
Did you mean:
willow
2018 Jul 03
2
Bug-closing protocol
...e know if any of you are interested in co-organizing such a BoF.
Thanks!
Kristof
Op do 21 jun. 2018 om 17:19 schreef Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> I'm just an armchair critic with a lot of opinions on what other people
> should do, and not enough willpower to pick one project and make it happen.
> :)
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:57 AM <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote:
>
>> So Reid, you'll be running a BoF on this at the October dev meeting? J
>>
>> --paulr
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* llvm-de...
2018 Jun 21
2
Bug-closing protocol
So Reid, you'll be running a BoF on this at the October dev meeting? ☺
--paulr
From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 6:12 PM
To: JVApen at gmail.com
Cc: llvm-dev
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Bug-closing protocol
Thanks for taking the time to report bugs! I think you are responsible for filing the most
2006 Oct 24
3
"Fixing the Caller-ID Problem", by John Todd for O'ReillyNet
This seems like a piece members of this list would find interesting...
===
There is growing concern over the interaction of VoIP systems
with the legacy PSTN, and the transmission of caller identity
data--most notably, Caller ID on the PSTN. It is not always
possible, or obvious how, to handle Caller ID data when moving
to or from VoIP and the PSTN networks. There are even business
models
2005 May 18
102
I quit.
It is with regret that I announce that Shorewall development and support is
officially ended.
Sean''s post has finally driven it home to me that in the long term, trying
to support a project like Shorewall is impossible for a person of my
personality and age.
Sean -- please believe that this isn''t about you or your post -- your post
was just the proverbial straw on this old