search for: willigent

Hi Arno, I think at this point the most helpful thing would be to get an apitrace (https://github.com/apitrace/apitrace) with your "fix" in place. Once you make the trace, change your fix to instead abort the program, and replay the trace. This will allow us to look at the precise call sequence that causes the issue. What is the numerical value of ve->vertex_buffer_index when

Hi there. I thy to compile asterisk-oh323-0.6.3a but it fail in the make command. I have the pwlib-v1_6_6-1 and openh323-v1_13_5-1 as saying in the README file of the packet asterisk-oh323-0.6.3a I do make and this is the error: # make for x in wrapper asterisk-driver; do make -C $x all || exit 1 ; done make: *** No rule to make target `ccflags'. Stop. make: *** No rule to make target

By any chance are there any free checkbook apps that have been written for Ruby? Looking to free myself from Gnucash/Grisbi/Quicken but don''t quite have the skills/time to make my own app. Has anyone done this and want to share? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I''m using the following configuration in the database.yml to connect to Oracle, however I could not connect while the settings seems to be correct: development_oracle: adapter: oci host: 127.0.0.1:8080/XE username: rubydb password: rubyrails What is wrong here? Can anyonbe help me? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

You could try to use the native mp3 support for MOH if you really want mp3 support. It is a lot better than using mpg123 IMHO. mpg123 kept doing nasty things to my system :) See http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20config%20musicon hold.conf there is a section about the native support. Guillaume > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Gofferje

Summary: The directory /usr/local/lib/R/site-library can be used for site-wide multi-user installations of R. This is even the default on Debian and Ubuntu (following a suggestion by Kurt and Fritz a decade ago over beers -- what could be better). However, R enforces wrong permissions on directories and files there (removing group-write) which effectively defeats this purpose,

Dave, I will try to locate and take a look at the actual llvm logic that deletes based on UB-presence, one of these days, and report back. In the mean time... Your “For example:" is a plausibility argument only. It is not meaningful until you can show this happening in real source code from real applications that are compiler warning free and static analysis warning free. Hal

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 7:40 AM Peter Lawrence <peterl95124 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Dave, > Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead > code elimination, > Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code > elimination ? > I haven't actually looked at how optimizations on the basis of the code being UB-free

Dave, Dead code elimination is generally done in a pass called dead code elimination, Can you give concrete examples why the same would not be true for UB code elimination ? Yes, speculatively hoisting code requires it to be UB-free, but that has nothing to do with UBCE deleting entire blocks of code because of the existence of UB. The former requires an analysis proving UB-absense, the