search for: wilhansen

The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even applices to if-else statements. One one hand, gperf (http://www.gnu.org/software/gperf/manual/gperf.html) offers a way to map strings to records without much difficulty (and it does its job

On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Chris Lattner wrote: >This should be fixed now, please verify, thanks! > >-Chris The newer code that TableGen produces is indeed lower however, MSVC still throws the same error messages (and moreover, I don't think they're fixing it anytime soon.. I'll try to re-open this issue to them). Also, it seems that the new code produces an extraneous "if

On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Wilhansen Li wrote: > The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky > specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). > Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even > applices to if-else statements. Right, fixing the VC++ issue is...

On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Wilhansen Li wrote: > The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky > specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). > Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even > applices to if-else statements. This should be fixed now, please...

...ng by hashing all the element and attribute names. Unfortunately, its a code generator, which we're trying to get rid of in LLVM. Still, I recommend the tool highly. Reid. On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 13:04:57 -0800 Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > >On Jan 1, 2008, at 1:51 AM, Wilhansen Li wrote: > >> The output of TableGen (intrinsics.gen) seems a bit too clunky >> specifically the switching parts (input the string, output the enum). >> Moreover, the code makes MSVC barf due to its nesting limit which even >> applices to if-else statements. > >Rig...

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Wilhansen Li <krad at crammerz-inc.net> Date: Jan 4, 2008 6:18 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Utilizing gperf for TableGen To: Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> It finally compiles well with MSVC. Thanks! On 1/4/08, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Alright, try this...

On 3/19/08, Argiris Kirtzidis <akyrtzi at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve > support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end. > > Goal: > Improve clang's C++ support. The scope of the project will be limited to > C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the > timeframe of a GSoC project and the

Hi all, I'd like to hear your opinions and ideas for a proposal to improve support for C++ parsing for LLVM's clang front end. Goal: Improve clang's C++ support. The scope of the project will be limited to C++ parsing, not code generation (I think the timeframe of a GSoC project and the complexity of C++ doesn't allow full C++ support to be developed). C++ parsing support