Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "widescale".
Did you mean:
timescale
2008 Jan 01
6
Delay on failed pw attempts
Hi,
Is there a way, or can a way be added, to add an "auth_failed_delay=10s"
style option that would put in an artificial delay after a failed
password attempt?
As it stands now, Dovecot seems highly vulnerable to widescale
brute-force password dictionary scans.
Even if it's not configurable, can a delay be hardcoded to something
like, say, 10 or 15 seconds?
--
Dean Brooks
dean at iglou.com
2017 Apr 07
3
Widescale clang-tidy (or similar) based cleanup
There have been some efforts recently to use clang-tidy or similar
automated refactoring to make project-wide cleanups/improvements to the
LLVM codebase that appear to me to be a bit out of character with the sort
of changes & philosophies that have been applied in the past.
I think there are a few issues at hand which I'll try to summarize:
* Churn/blame-convenience:
Previously, large
2017 Apr 07
2
Widescale clang-tidy (or similar) based cleanup
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 3:14 PM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:05 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > There have been some efforts recently to use clang-tidy or similar
> automated refactoring to make project-wide cleanups/improvements to the
> LLVM codebase that appear to me
2015 Feb 17
2
[LLVMdev] Moving towards a singular pointer type
...atch out of tree (never fun).
>
Yeah, possibly - chatted about this a bit with Chandler too & his
experience has been that shaking these sort of things out is often
out-of-tree (granted, that's with small changes to the canonicalization of
pointer types in specific places - this kind of widescale change might hit
quite a few tests in-tree first before reaching the long-tail of random
out-of-tree tests people run/care about) so having an out-of-tree patch
won't necessarily get us far, and as you say - comes at a bit of a cost to
maintain it out of tree and then transform it into the fina...
2009 Oct 27
7
LVM+Xen+FreeNAS possible?
Hi All,
We''ve limitation of 500 GB per server as per ServerLoft.
we are needing to store word/pdf files. We are planning to use following
setup.
/dev/sda1 - boot - ext2
/dev/sda2 - swap
/dev/sda3 - dom0 - ext3
/dev/sda4 - LVM - one LV for each domU, We''re planning 3 DomUs.
/dev/sda5 - FreeNAS. Is that possible? Can it be in one of the LVs under 4th
partition?
Currently, one
2017 Apr 10
4
Widescale clang-tidy (or similar) based cleanup
+100 to Mehdi. Large scale cleanups should not only be welcome, they
should be encouraged. This is the type of work that almost nobody wants to
do and is sorely underappreciated (as evidenced by the fact that this
thread even exists, IMHO). Code quality and code health are ongoing costs,
and if we raise the barrier to entry for this type of change, then they're
not going to happen.
Why
2009 Nov 28
6
AIDE or OSSEC on CentOS 5.4 x86_64?
Starting with a fresh load and after I finish hardening the load
following the Center for Internet Security (CIS) guidance, I'm wondering
whether AIDE or OSSEC would be a better intrusion detection system.
I installed AIDE and did a quick test of AIDE and after initializing the
db and applying the recent cups update, I found that 1700+ files had
changed. Those are a lot of changes to wade
2015 Feb 17
4
[LLVMdev] Moving towards a singular pointer type
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2015, at 3:38 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's an idea been thrown around in a few different threads (including
> Rafael's recent
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20141201/247285.html
> and Chandler's