search for: wibind

Am 9/29/20 um 7:44 AM schrieb Christian Kuntz via samba: > Is the wiki information still accurate? If so, what needs to change about > my configuration to fix this issue? > If the information is out of date and the modern utility of "use mmap = no" > is unknown, how can I test it? hm, I guess the mmap no setting should have been removed alongside this change:

Hi Rowland, Am 9/29/20 um 10:33 AM schrieb Rowland penny: > Ralph, the wikipage, that Christian referred to, says to use: > > netbios name = something > clustering = yes > idmap config *?: backend = autorid > idmap config *?: range = 1000000-1999999 > > My understanding is that autorid is meant to be used with multiple > domains, yet Christian's smb.conf is

Am 9/29/20 um 1:10 PM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > On 29/09/2020 11:59, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: >> Am 9/29/20 um 12:29 PM schrieb Martin Schwenke: >>> Don't we need some sort of ID mapping to ensure that IDs are mapped >>> consistently across the cluster? >> sure, but iirc idmap_tdb (the default) is clustered. >> >> -slow > > Then

I am wondering if winbind works with win 2003. I can get winbind working just fine with 2k servers, but when I run wbinfo -t, all I get is "can not check secret". it joined the domain fine, but can not get it any info using wbinfo. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com

On 29/09/2020 11:59, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 9/29/20 um 12:29 PM schrieb Martin Schwenke: >> Don't we need some sort of ID mapping to ensure that IDs are mapped >> consistently across the cluster? > sure, but iirc idmap_tdb (the default) is clustered. > > -slow Then why does the wikipage have these lines: idmap config * : backend = autorid idmap config * :

On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:22:08 +0200, Ralph Boehme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 9/29/20 um 10:33 AM schrieb Rowland penny: > > Ralph, the wikipage, that Christian referred to, says to use: > > > > netbios name = something > > clustering = yes > > idmap config *?: backend = autorid > > idmap config *?: range = 1000000-1999999 >

On 29/09/2020 08:35, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 9/29/20 um 7:44 AM schrieb Christian Kuntz via samba: >> Is the wiki information still accurate? If so, what needs to change about >> my configuration to fix this issue? >> If the information is out of date and the modern utility of "use mmap = no" >> is unknown, how can I test it? > hm, I guess the

Hello all, I'm currently running samba on debian buster, version 2:4.9.5+dsfg-5 with lustre 2.13.0. The problem I'm experiencing is pretty straightforward, if I set "use mmap = no" in my global config (as suggested by the wiki), winbind fails to start and the cluster grinds to a halt. Here is the error messages from systemd: Sep 28 22:14:17 tenzin systemd[1]: Starting Samba

...-3807014553-2801) Domain Users (S-1-5-21-531635747-2076120898-3807014553-513) The first appear to be correctly mapped to the local users group the latter has no mapping (-1) that's to me appeares really odd.... Can somebody explain me this old fact ? My actual Samba server (with smtp, pop3, wibind, sshd, apache21) works perefctly and every user can authenticate correctly on every service with his/her own AD domain user and password Any Hint? PLEASE !?!

...m the PDC and set a random id in the idmap, so id differs on pdc and menbers, also between menbers ps: and does running winbind on a PDC could get it to map the user to two id on it : one static created at account genesis and the other when the PDC use getpwnam , getting the libc to call teh local wibind . It depend on the order of the "passwd" attributes in /etc/nsswitch but waht if the admin setted winbind before compat (or unix) ? I also had a difficult case with a domain menber (samba+winbind) where a local user had the same name as the domain one: with "winbind use default doma...

...y replace the winbind entries in smb.conf. Below is smb.conf, and nsswitch.conf. I've tried a bunch of different settings for passwd and group in nsswitch, but it does not seem to make any difference with winbind (files winbind, files winbind sss, files sss winbind, files pam winbind, files wibind pam, etc., etc., etc.). What also beats me is, that the logs are very quiet. I am happy that it works with sssd, but I just don't want to leave it without any explanations. At least not after spending a day trying to get it working. Best regards, Peter smb.conf (no shares yet) =========...

I'm using an AD group in cupsd configuration: SystemGroup printops in cups-files.conf, where 'printops' is an AD group. I hoped that systemd 'self healing' would suffices, but not: cups start before wibind, does not found 'printops' group and fail. There's some better way to force a deps; I'm thinking of an: systemctl edit cups.service adding: [Unit] After=winbind.service Wants=winbind.service But i'm ask. Thanks. -- I'm old enough to remember when the Internet...

...ntries in smb.conf. > > Below is smb.conf, and nsswitch.conf. I've tried a bunch of different > settings for passwd and group in nsswitch, but it does not seem to > make any difference with winbind (files winbind, files winbind sss, > files sss winbind, files pam winbind, files wibind pam, etc., etc., > etc.). > > What also beats me is, that the logs are very quiet. > > I am happy that it works with sssd, but I just don't want to leave it > without any explanations. At least not after spending a day trying to > get it working. > You have two imp...

Thanks for any information and your time!!! I have been working on getting my samba 2.2.5 server to work with my 2K domain in (native mode). Setup is on a RH 7.3 system with two NIC's one on a Internet network the other is for the LAN. What I need is to get the XP/2K/4.0 systems to see the samba shares and us them based on the users and groups that are on the domain. This is a 2K AD

.... >> >> Below is smb.conf, and nsswitch.conf. I've tried a bunch of different >> settings for passwd and group in nsswitch, but it does not seem to >> make any difference with winbind (files winbind, files winbind sss, >> files sss winbind, files pam winbind, files wibind pam, etc., etc., >> etc.). >> >> What also beats me is, that the logs are very quiet. >> >> I am happy that it works with sssd, but I just don't want to leave it >> without any explanations. At least not after spending a day trying to >> get it working....

...39;t if its through Samba. * If the primary group is changed to the group of the resource, the user can write via Samba; however if the primary group is something else yet the user is a member of the resource group in extended groups, "Access Denied" again. Everything works perfectly. Wibind is returning all the proper users and groups of AD. This is debian-sarge. Samba 3.0.14a-3sarge4. Kernel 2.6.20. Windows Server 2000 SP4 - Active Directory. Any help is greatly appreciated. smb.conf: [global] dos charset = CP850 unix charset = UTF-8 display charset = LOCALE workgroup = XY...

...= 70001-80000 idmap config INTERNAL:backend = ad idmap config INTERNAL:schema_mode = rfc2307 idmap config INTERNAL:range = 500-40000 winbind nss info = rfc2307 #these are NOT from the domain member wiki winbind use default domain = yes #winbind separator = + #wibind enum groups = yes #winbind trusted domains only = no ########################### #from wiki on Configuring file shares (feb7'14) vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = Yes store dos attributes = Yes ######################### log level = 7 #Oplocks vet...

I'm trying to set up a new fileshare, to replace an aging NT4 machine we've been using for far too long. I'd like to run Linux (RedHat 7.3) on the machine. Basically, I'm trying to create a fileshare "files" that people can transparently log in to from NT4 and Windows 2000 workstations. My boss has approved the use of Linux for the server, but only if I can make it