search for: whoopsy

Hi all I tried to run bonnie++ disk stresser in dom-U, who''s disk is backed with non-local (on nfs) loop-back file. The machine rebooted pretty quickly. So, how do I tell what''s barfing? Is it Xen? Is it dom-0 (nfs or loop-back)? I looked in dom-0''s /var/log/messages and didn''t see any obvious record of a dom-0 whoopsie (but is that the right place to look

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/188361 says that at least some version of Nautilus followed symlinks when deleting. Whoopsie!

Hi, What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB? This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations please :) ) What experiences did you had with your preferred FS ? (good and not so good points) Thank you, Adrian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3105

...: <#VC> shift IST <NMI> ... does stuff <#VC> # again, safe because the shift But what happens if you get the NMI before your IST adjustment? <#VC> <NMI> ... does stuff <#VC> # again, happily wrecks your earlier #VC shift IST # whoopsy, too late Either way around we get to fix this up in NMI (and any other IST exception that can happen while in #VC, hello #MC). And more complexity there is the very last thing we need :-( There's no way you can fix up the IDT without getting an NMI first. This entire exception model is fund...

hi everybody, I used to test this rules on my gateway : iptables -I FORWARD -p udp -m length --length 39 -m u32 --u32 ''27&0x8f=7'' --u32 ''31=0x527c4833'' -j DROP This was working with a 2.6.16 kernel but now i upgraded to 2.6.17 it give me the following message : [ 5333.870000] ip_tables: u32 match: invalid size 0 != 2028 iptables: Unknown error -1 I tried

Thanks, when I change it do the following I get a syntax error #!/bin/bash # while read LINE do echo $LINE done < cat list.txt ./test_bash.sh ./test_bash.sh: line 6: syntax error near unexpected token `list.txt' ./test_bash.sh: line 6: ` done < cat list.txt'

hope thus comes under the remit of this mailking list... We use puppet, and Im trying to come up with "code" that will create two user accounts with a shared groiup ID eg? user1 with UID 1000user 2 with UID 1001 but I would like them BOTH to share the GID of 2000 I've tried the following accounts::groups:? ? jointgroup:? ? ? ? gid: '2000' accounts::users: ? ? user1:? ? ? ?

On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:24:40 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 18.10.18 um 15:19 schrieb Anderson Hoffmann do Carmo via samba: > > I use a script for backup Samba/AD and before running the backup I > > use the command '/etc/init.d/samba stop' > > After I migrated ubuntu from version 16 to version 18, this command

Hi Andy, On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:37:41AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > 1. Use IST for #VC and deal with all the mess that entails. With the removal of IST shifting I wonder what you would suggest on how to best implement an NMI-safe IST handler with nesting support. My current plan is to implement an IST handler which switches itself off the IST stack as soon as possible, freeing it for

So it seems that I have identified the source of all of my permissions issues, though I'm unclear as to exactly why these problems have occurred and would love an explanation if anyone can offer one. I was using mdadm to create a RAID 1 array, formatting it ext4 and storing all of the data that samba was serving on /dev/md0. The two drives that make up the array are hosted by an LSI MegaRaid

Hello to the Samba devs and mailing list subscribers, I've run into a bit of trouble getting a new domain member server setup. I've got three Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit VMs running the latest stable build of Samba built from source acting as Domain Controllers. I've got a fourth physical machine running Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit running the canonical distribution samba (Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu)

On 1/15/20 6:50 PM, David Greene wrote: > "Doerfert, Johannes via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >>> Nowadays we have tools to manage the stacks for us [1][2], and that as a >>> plus don't require arc/php to be installed on your system. >>> >>> I don't do much LLVM / clang stuff, but submitting stuff with [1] just

Include logs from the failed boot On Jun 11, 2015 10:55 PM, "Andre Campos Rodovalho" < andre.rodovalho at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, I'm facing issues with a Point of View GT210/218 and nouveau > drivers. I'm using ubuntu server with LXDE on top of it... > > *lshw -c video* output: > *-display > description: VGA compatible controller >

dmesg output: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [ 0.000000] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.16.0-38-generic (buildd at allspice) (gcc version 4.8.2 (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) ) #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu

well after recently talking about how i haven''t had any problems with btrfs on several machines for ~1.5yrs... it happens :-( ) 2.6.35 kernel ) btrfs on partition 2 of sda ) no special mkfs or mount options used (except ssd) my fiancé''s EEE S101 netbook, w/SSD, is failing hard. when booting normally (subvol=__active), no special boot options, it hangs at udev... it all