search for: whittling

Dear R-users, I am trying to translate a matlab code for calculating the Local Whittle estimator in time series with long memory originally written by Shimotsu and available free in his webpage ( http://www.econ.queensu.ca/pub/faculty/shimotsu/ ) The Matlab code is ======================================================================================= function[r] = whittle(d,x,m) % WHITTLE.M

Hi, On windows, get_peername works both with connections obtained via start_server, and connections obtained via connect. On linux, get_peername seems to only work with connections obtained via start_server. (I''m using svn HEAD.) I''m wondering which is the intended behavior? (I realize get_peername is less useful for connections obtained via connect, since one should already

hi all, I have a simple question that does power spectral analysis related to capacity dimension, information dimension, lyapunov exponent, hurst exponent. If yes then please show me the way. I am newbie in the world of chaos. Sayonara With Smile & With Warm Regards :-) G a u r a v Y a d a v Senior Executive Officer, Economic Research & Surveillance Department, Clearing

In both LLVM 2.9 and the current svn head, I get the following error when running llc % llc < fxp2.ll LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0xa5302b0: glue = carry_false [ID=7] on this code: target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" define i32 @fxpadd(i32 %cl) { entry: %0 = zext i32 %cl to i128 %1 = zext i32 %cl to i128 %2 = add i128 %1, %0 br label %L1001510 L1001510:

> > There have been reports of -9 using huge amounts of memory. -9 is > > really > > theoretical, but people always seem to want to try the max setting. > > Anyway, > > that's not an excuse but figuring out why -9 is using so much > > memory is lower > > on my list than other stuff. -8 should get within 0.01% of -9 and > > is pretty > >

So, as 2.6.21-rc1 is approaching, what is the upstream merge status for the paravirt-ops backends? I believe VMI is in Andi's tree, plus or minus some bugfixes that are still being whittled in, but Andi, do you think the VMI code is in good shape for merging? It would be nice for everyone to clarify their upstream plans - is the goal still to get Xen and lguest merged for the next kernel

So, as 2.6.21-rc1 is approaching, what is the upstream merge status for the paravirt-ops backends? I believe VMI is in Andi's tree, plus or minus some bugfixes that are still being whittled in, but Andi, do you think the VMI code is in good shape for merging? It would be nice for everyone to clarify their upstream plans - is the goal still to get Xen and lguest merged for the next kernel

Hello all, I'm trying to understand a bit of LLVM IR syntax. I have a function definition which looks like this in IR: define void @foo(%1* ptr) { ... The C code for foo has a definition that looks like: typedef struct bar_struct bar; ... Definition of struct bar_struct ... void foo(bar *ptr) { ... I can't whittle down a convenient test source file just now; but

Hi Carl, I don't know much about the specifics of any given optimisation, but if you do something like the following, you can at least see which optimisation pass is responsible. At the very least perhaps that can point to the next place to investigate. (also interesting to note Apple's shipped clang doesn't exhibit this behaviour, I had to use my own recent svn tree) $ clang -arch

Hello, I'm writing an LTO pass and I'd like to be able to duplicate a function (with debugging info). I'm trying to accomplish this with CloneFunction but it's leading to a seg fault in ld. I've whittled down my problem so that it occurs in this small pass [1]. If I run this pass with opt, I get the expected result (i.e. a valid program that calls main twice). If I run

On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Tyler Hardin <tghardin1 at catamount.wcu.edu> wrote: > I was suggesting to add it to the function, like > volatile void func(..); > Theoretically, this would tell the compiler not to omit seemingly superfluous calls to func. 'volatile' can't apply to a function, so I'm not sure what you mean. In your example, 'volatile' modifies

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Craig Smith <craig at ni.com> wrote: > In both LLVM 2.9 and the current svn head, I get the following error when running llc > > % llc < fxp2.ll > LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0xa5302b0: glue = carry_false [ID=7] > > on this code: > > target triple = "i386-pc-linux-gnu" > > define i32 @fxpadd(i32 %cl) { > entry:

I'm getting a SEGV on a FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE box. The client is Solaris 9/SPARC. Both boxes run 2.6.2. The command I'm running is: $ rsync -arHRv --numeric-ids --delete --exclude=/opt/dist/cdrom \ [paths] [server]:[path] If I whittle down what appears in [paths], then it works. $ gdb rsync rsync.core gdb> bt #0 0x280faf0d in strncmp () from /usr/lib/libc.so.4 #1 0x7 in ?? () #2

I'm currently compiling Samba 3.3.X with the following: CFLAGS = -g -Wall -O2 ./configure --cache-file=./config.cache \ --with-fhs \ --enable-shared \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc \ --libdir=/usr/lib/samba \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ --with-piddir=/var/run/samba \

first, apologies for so many posts yesterday and today. I am wrestling with nls() and nls2(). I have tried to whittle it down to a simple example that still has my problem, yet can be cut-and-pasted into R. here it is: library(nls2) options(digits=12); y= c(0.4334,0.3200,0.5848,0.6214,0.3890,0.5233,0.4753,0.2104,0.3240,0.2827,0.3847,0.5571,0.5432,0.1326,0.3481) x=

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Bueno, Denis <denbuen at sandia.gov> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to understand a bit of LLVM IR syntax.  I have a function > definition which looks like this in IR: > >    define void @foo(%1* ptr) { ... > > The C code for foo has a definition that looks like: > >    typedef struct bar_struct bar; >    ... Definition

The following program is whittled down from a much larger program that always works on Intel, and always works on AMD's threadripper with lapply but not mclappy. With mclapply on AMD, all processes go into "suspend" mode and the program then hangs. This bug is replicable on an AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X 16-Core Processor (128GB RAM), running latest ubuntu 18.04. The R version

I have Dovecot 0.99.9.1 compiled from the source, without SSL, running on a Red Hat 9.0 system - EXT3 file system, Pentium Pro 233 MHz, Intel motherboard, 128M RAM, IBM 40Gig 7200 RPM HD. I find reading and searching to be nice and fast, and comparing it with Courier IMAP on a Celeron 824 MHz, I think Dovecot is generally not much slower, which means it may well be faster than Courier in some or

Dear R developers: The following R program produces a pdf file that does not survive ghostscript distillation correctly. The undistilled version is at http://welch.econ.brown.edu/temp/try.PDF while the distilled version is at http://welch.econ.brown.edu/temp/try.pdf . When previewed, the points are wrong in the distilled .pdf version, but only in one of the two points invokations (huh?) . The

On Thursday 02 October 2008 15:37, Dan Gohman wrote: > I highly recommend the viewGraph() output. -view-isel-dags and > -view-sched-dags show the graph before and after selection, > respectively. See the CodeGen docs where I recently added some > text describing all these options. Yeah, I've been using those but they're real hard to understand with big graphs. > Also,