search for: whither

It seems that fewer and fewer favorite programs run with wine. Stuff that ran 100% on older builds crashes out on the newer ones with elan. There needs to be (more) regression testing. However, damage has already been done and propagated and needs correction simply to get back to the previous level of operability.

I have rpmfusion set up, but yum tells me that mplayerplug-in is not available. Has it been replaced by something else? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

From my reading of the Linux Kernel mailing list, it seems that the LM87 sensor driver made it into kernel 2.6.8. Anyone know why it is not present in the RHEL4/Centos4.2 current kernel? Thanks.

I noticed that asterisk.org got a redesign, quite recently it seems, which is very nice, but the addons package isn't listed for download any longer, nor are releases posted to http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/ . That said, looks like it's still available in svn, http://svnview.digium.com/svn/asterisk-addons/tags/1.6.1.1/ . So just wondering if addons will be around for

Anyone know where the sources for app_nv_faxdetect officially live? I couldn't turn them up on a web search, just patched versions for 1.4, etc. Thanks.

Looking at epel-testing, while libguestfs-* 1.0.57-2 is available, virt-inspector does not appear to be. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=markup shows the virt-inspector bits commented out, and http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libguestfs/EL-5/libguestfs.spec?view=log doesn't appear to have an explanation. Wuzzup? :)

Dale, > Chris would like to turn on -enable-eh rather than > -enable-correct-eh- > support in the llvm testsuite for those targets that support it. The > following patch is intended to turn it on for x86 and ppc. Anton, > Duncan, are you OK with this? Yes, looks obvious :) > If these were visible to end users I would not like exposing sjlj, an > implementation detail;

On Dec 20, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Dale, >>> If these were visible to end users I would not like exposing sjlj, >>> an >>> implementation detail; however my understanding is that they >>> aren't. On the basis that they're intended for use by llvm >>> geeks, I think

On Dec 20, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> I'm strongly of the opinion that you shouldn't have to say anything >> to >> get EH on targets where it works. >> -fexceptions is set up like that. > > I'm not sure I get what you mean. gcc defaults to no EH data, you > need > -fexceptions to

Hi Dale, > Chris would like to turn on -enable-eh rather than -enable-correct-eh- > support in the llvm testsuite for those targets that support it.  The   > following patch is intended to turn it on for x86 and ppc.  Anton,   > Duncan, are you OK with this? yes, though see below. > Chris would also like to discuss renaming the EH command line   > options, and I have to agree

> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:52:50 -0700 > From: Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed > We need some volunteers to help with the 3.0 release notes. Traditionally, Chris has been the one to go > through all the commits (6 months worth!) and come up with a concrete list of things that have changed in 3.0. > Ideally,

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Dale Johannesen wrote: > I'm strongly of the opinion that you shouldn't have to say anything to > get EH on targets where it works. > -fexceptions is set up like that. I'm not sure I get what you mean. gcc defaults to no EH data, you need -fexceptions to turn it on. g++ defaults it to on, because it knows the front-end. You think we should have llc

On Thu, 20 Dec 2007, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dale, >> If these were visible to end users I would not like exposing sjlj, an   >> implementation detail; however my understanding is that they aren't.   >> On the basis that they're intended for use by llvm geeks, I think   >> either of these is an improvement, except in the second case I think   >> the

SYSLINUX is certainly useful. I currently start Debian from their standard boot floppy, which uses SYSLINUX. I found it very easy to edit syslinux.cfg for ide-scsi setup. Surely the future lies with bootable CDs and floppy images specifically designed for them. Maybe there should be a combined SYSLINUX / ISOLINUX package which allows you to specify Floppy Emulation or not. But if you invent a

Chris would like to turn on -enable-eh rather than -enable-correct-eh- support in the llvm testsuite for those targets that support it. The following patch is intended to turn it on for x86 and ppc. Anton, Duncan, are you OK with this? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mf.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 669 bytes Desc: not

Hi All, I've gotten a few notes over the last few months and also given some of the recent changes to various backends to "update" the default tunings for a generic processor it made me think again about adding support for tuning to a processor rather than generating processor specific code - hence, mtune. I hope this is rather uncontroversial, but happy to discuss at length if

(clean install) >gem install rails Attempting local installation of ''rails'' Local gem file not found: rails*.gem Attempting remote installation of ''rails'' Install required dependency activesupport? [Yn] y Install required dependency activerecord? [Yn] y Install required dependency actionpack? [Yn] y Install required dependency actionmailer? [Yn] y

...but that is unsatisfying because: a) the pdf renders in the browser. b) the user can''t go back to the site from there. Thanks for your help, Lee ********************************* All that is gold does not glitter. Not all those who wander are lost. The old who are strong do not whither. Deep roots are not touched by the frost. -- J.R.R. Tolkein

Hi, I would like to calculate the area under segmented regression lines (single breakpoints). I had thought that I could do this using the predict() function to ascertain some key x y values in order to determine the dimensions for two trapezoids (under each segment of my regression). However, I've not had any success with this and have just read online that the predict function does not work

...ms to be irrelevant, but for the record, the installed one is 0.9.12. I have also tried 0.9.14 and the result of my wine-git tests. All are the same. I made sure to delete the program's .ini file when reinstalling. Thanks, Doug. -- When we want to read of the deeds that are done for love, whither do we turn? To the murder column. - G.B. Shaw.