Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "whin".
Did you mean:
when
2007 Jun 01
3
Question on the R's C stack limit
...n. In the R-exts document, it says:"Note that R's own front ends
use a stack size of 10Mb". I desire to know: is it possible to decrease this
stack size
by modifying R's source code? If it's possible, which part of the source
code is responsible for the issue?
Thank you all.
Whin
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Jul 06
1
How to disable R's C stack checking
...b
--build=powerpc-apple-darwin8 --with-arch=nocona --with-tune=generic
--program-prefix= --host=i686-apple-darwin8
--target=i686-apple-darwin8
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367)
My machine infomation:
$uname -a
Darwin xi-imac 8.9.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.9.1
Whin.
2005 Nov 24
8
A minor beef
...nd the package supporters do a bang
up job, but the one deficiency I've found is the fact that one can
never rely on being able to get updates at any particular time.
Whether it's CentOS proper or the Dag additions, something is broke
most every time I want to apply updates.
I know this is whin[ge]ing, and I certainly don't have a solution to offer.
If anyone can offer bucks and/or equipment to improved the software
distribution process, your karma would get an enormous boost!!!
--
Collins Richey
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code ... If you write
the code as...
2007 May 29
1
question about R_ParseVector function
Hi r-devel,
The R_ParseVector has been changed in R-2.5.0, and there is a simple
description about the 4th argument at
http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/NEWS, it says that:
"R_ParseVector() has a new 4th argument 'SEXP srcfile' allowing source
references to be attached to the returned expression list. "
I do not quite understand the purpose of adding the 4th argument. Would
2007 May 18
1
R 2.5.0 building problem
Hi,
While I was trying to build R 2.5.0 src on
Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 4)
Kernel 2.6.9-42.ELsmp on an x86_64
The following errors occurred:
gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o lapack.so Lapack.o
-L../../../lib -lRlapack -L../../../lib -lRblas -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/3.4.6/libg2c.a(s_cat.o):
relocation R_X86_64_32
2015 Jan 12
0
Design changes are done in Fedora
...is
released to everyone. One needs to either use what is compiled or be
smart enough to take the source code and make it do what they want.
That can be done .. but it is much easier to bitch about what someone
else is doing that actually do something themselves .. so what you will
see is a bunch whinning all over the Internet and people using whatever
is released .. because the whinners are too lazy to actually work on an
open source project.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc:...
2015 Jan 12
1
Design changes are done in Fedora
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
>> On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
>>>> On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>>>> PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite
2001 Feb 22
11
Lets try this push again.. 2.5.1p2 bugs left.
Things that are still outstanding:
1) Solaris/Redhat/HPUX session.c patch. I've not seen a ya or na on
Kevin's pam patch from the Solaris group.
2) Odd Redhat/Debian scp/ssh issues. .. I'm baffled, and I can't
replicate the bug. Nor have I seen anything remotely like it reported.
3) SCO.. Is it happy yet for compiling? =)
Completed:
1) mdoc2man.pl .. Commited into
2015 Jan 12
4
Design changes are done in Fedora
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
> On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote:
>>>> PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat
>>>> if
>>>> I
2013 Jul 14
2
Does R ever stop responding without a message?
Hi,
Have any of you ever encountered a situation where R stops processing an
instruction but does not give a "not responding" message?
The reason I ask is I am working in RStudio (Mac OS/X 10.7, 1.8 Ghz i7, 4
GB DDR3) and the instruction I entered in the command line pane is still
being processed since last night around 7 PM. I expected it to take on the
order of 8-12 hours to