search for: whichs

Hello, I'm using Samba 4.0.5 in Debian Wheezy as a member server of a DC (in Debian Wheezy too with Samba 4.0.5) and the clients are Windows7 Pro. The users use shares in the member server. Sometimes, after the logoff of the users in the Win7 clients, there are connections with the member server whiches never stop. I can see it with the "smbstatus" command which point PID out to me

...ut now my question: Who say, that this information must be stored in the original inode data? The answer is: Is isn't neccessary at all. Ok, how then? My prescription: 1.1. We need a fixed inode, I'll refer to that as the "deletion inode" here. 1.2. We need three blocks, whichs block numbers could be stored in the super block. I'll refer to them as "deletion blocks" here. Now, lets assume, a user enters rm foo.img where foo.img is a very big file. The steps, the ext3fs driver currently does is (IIRC, at least): 2.1. Link the inode to a special list...

...ing rule, which I took from the "redirecting the default gateway to a host on the VPN" Howto [1] ip route add 128.0.0.0/1 via $VPN_GATEWAY dev $INTERFACE Without this route, the clients can handle out each other. Hmmm ... Last Problem seems to be the local UFW Firewall on the clients whichs seems to block the Broadcast for LocalDiscovery = yes. Need to check the logs here. Ciao! Marcus [1] http://www.tinc-vpn.org/examples/redirect-gateway/

I've got a table of 1 row per observation. 16 questions * n subjects * 4 classrooms (2 teachers * 2 conditions) I'd like to run some simple regressions that look something like this: lm(length ~ elapsed) I'd like to do the regressions several times, split out by questionkey, student, class. What I've been doing is using a series of which's to create new data sets (e.g.

I have a new K8MM motherboard AMD x86_64 3000+ with the S3 unichrome chipset. The default xorg.conf used vesa driver whichs gives 800x600. I tried to change the driver to via and the x log file says via not found. Is something missing in x86_64 or did I miss something? Jerry

Hello! I have some weird problem. I have pxelinux(3.10) configured fine. Os: FreeBsd 6.1, tftp-hpa 0.41, some version of dhcpd from ports. It worked before on another machine which's hd passed away and i lost my working example. Configured new computer as boot server... What happends is dhcp gives all the parameters to client(this server also works for giving addresses to workstations) -

Funny thing happening with an NT Client: it sees all the files in a public Samba share, but when I make any change (like renaming a file or dropping files into it) the change doesn't show up in the window until I press F5 (Refresh). Is it some config in Samba whichs defaults to "lazy" behavior which I'm failing to see? Thanx 4All, Juan -- **************************************** * Depois de tudo que aconteceu, * * voc? AINDA vai * * botar dinheiro na m?o da NIKE?? * OGY IS POLICY @ THE END ******************...

When ungraded from Ubuntu 11.04 to 11.10, dovecot can't start successfully with lots of errors i.e. "dovecot: doveconf: Warning: ... 'imaps' protocol is no longer necessary, remove it"... At any rate, I want to setup a postfix(MTA)/dovecot(MDA) servers on Ubuntu 11.10, by following the Postfix installation and configuration instruction in Ubuntu Serverguide, in "1.4

Is this Samba 3 or Samba 4? If samba 3, which ldap server are you using> What is the mail server? Does the mail server have its own LDAP server included it or is also using an external LDAP server. If you want replication between LDAP servers, they should be the same type of LDAP server (e.g. OpenLDAP or Apache Directory Server or Oracle Directory Server.) If you have one

...ould > be made that it would be better to guarantee evaluation of both, but > it's usually easy enough to do this explicitly, so I don't see a need.) Same from here: I do not see how this can easily be made more efficient, since evaluating ony parts causes a lot of copies of objects whichs slows stuff down, hence you need some complexity in yes and no to make evaluations of parts of them more efficient on R level. Anyway, to solve the problem, we may want an add argument to ifelse2() that allows for specification of the type of the result (as vapply does)? Best, Uwe > Dunca...

Hello all, There's a new Version of getwinegit.sh. It is now at 0.4. There is no need to comfigure the pathes to the programs getwinegit needs. Everything happens automatically now ;). I hope you enjoy this release... Here's the readme and the changelog: getwinegit.sh-README :: Intro getwinegit is a script which was designed to download/update, compile and install the current

Hi, Am Samstag, den 26.09.2015, 12:20 +0200 schrieb Marcus Schopen: > Last Problem seems to be the local UFW Firewall on the clients whichs > seems to block the Broadcast for LocalDiscovery = yes. Need to check the > logs here. Puzzeling around with UFW firewall. What ports need to be open on the clients to get "LocalDiscovery = yes" working? I don't see any blocked packages in kern.log. If I disable the UFW firewa...

...t block anything? So, as a first workaround I tried disabling SELinux, but this doesn't work either, I still get the warning which should not happen at all if disabled. cat /selinux/enforce shows "0" (= not enforced) I disabled by setting SELINUX=disabled in /etc/sysconfig/selinux (whichs symlinks to /etc/selinux). Yes, I rebooted with each try. The unofficial SELinux FAQ at http://www.crypt.gen.nz/selinux/faq.html says to add a kernel parameter to grub.conf for completely disabling it. However, that's not what I want. I want to disable it by "normal" means (or pre...

btrfs_qgroup_limit limits the size of a qgroup. Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 10 ++++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index 6918d4f..033d460 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c

btrfs_qgroup_create creates a new qgroup. Signed-off-by: Hu Tao <hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 9 +++++++++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index 033d460..dccaf5a 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++ b/daemon/btrfs.c @@

...y. Normally Samba should map the permission of the parent directory "Shares" to the Employees "this directory" permission to map the Linux permissions correctly. Then it should add another permission for all subdirectorys and files that are created within the Employees directory whichs maps the permissions of the Linux Employees directory. Here's a picture how it looks in windows (It's a german windows, but I think it's understandable) https://imgur.com/a/Ga9dw Hopefully you understand the problem, if not, just feel free to ask for further information :) I don'...

Hi All; Is there an GUI for Asterisk that can help in showing the call flow (who is in progress, who is connected, called number, ...)? I was think in AsteriskNow does this? Any advise? Regards Bilal ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Hi All. I have many days reading and research about asterisk and vicidial. I thing this issue is about asterisk and doesnt about vicidial. Isn't it? I have a problem with theses application (I already ask for help in vicidial forums), but I can not fix it. I have debian 5 with asterisk 1.2.24 and vicidial 2.0.4. This server has a IAX tunnel with another asterisk server B which connect to

Hello tinc users, i have the follow configuration: 1 client/server called master, it is always reachable from internet (with dyndns) 5 clients, that connects to the master and the other clients (all behind a router (NAT)) master-hosts-file: Address = ... Port = ... Subnet = ... Compression = 0 ---- key ----- client-hosts-files: Compression = 0 Subnet = ... ----- key ----- tinc.conf Name = ....

Hi Guus, Am Freitag, den 25.09.2015, 17:04 +0200 schrieb Guus Sliepen: > Ok, that means by default the UDP NAT timeout on the Cisco is extremely > short. > > > I check the manual of the the Cisco NAT for any TCP/UDP > > timeout settings, but there is no way to modify anything like "keeps > > TCP/UDP connections alive". > > It wouldn't be called