search for: whethe

...n_US.UTF-8;= LC_IDENTIFICATION=3DC > > attached base packages: > [1] stats =A0 =A0 graphics =A0grDevices utils =A0 =A0 datasets =A0methods= =A0 base > > other attached packages: > [1] sem_0.9-17 >> > > ...for this system, the model simply repeatedly fails to converge, whethe= r > debug is set or not. > > I have also tried altering my model. This has resulted in the same bugs, = but > instead of "every so often simply not converging," it actually converges = and > appears to be the model I asked R to solve...but this is rare. > > Please le...

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1660387551-150661043-1249684349=:2997 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Hi Jeff, =09As mentioned in my message, I *did* replicate on another platform.=20 One platform was

...t; vs. "port only hangs around > because a bunch of vcpi allocations and other payload things upstream of > the port might still need the port lookup key to free resources". Instead > of again sprinkling complicated conditions and magic tricks all over the > code to figure out whethe we should allow the get_validate_port to succeed > or not, or the modeset to succeed or not. mhm, I've been experimenting with this and I think I agree this is definitely the right solution to go with. It'll end up decomplicating a lot of this :) > -Daniel > > > Piles of co...

...ot yet unplugged" vs. "port only hangs around because a bunch of vcpi allocations and other payload things upstream of the port might still need the port lookup key to free resources". Instead of again sprinkling complicated conditions and magic tricks all over the code to figure out whethe we should allow the get_validate_port to succeed or not, or the modeset to succeed or not. -Daniel > > Piles of comments below. > > Cheers, Daniel > > > - Use the small changes to drm_dp_put_port() to add even more error > > checking to make misusage of the helper...

...ly hangs around > > because a bunch of vcpi allocations and other payload things upstream of > > the port might still need the port lookup key to free resources". Instead > > of again sprinkling complicated conditions and magic tricks all over the > > code to figure out whethe we should allow the get_validate_port to succeed > > or not, or the modeset to succeed or not. > > mhm, I've been experimenting with this and I think I agree this is definitely > the right solution to go with. It'll end up decomplicating a lot of this :) Since it looks like...

...allocations and other payload things upstream of > > > > the port might still need the port lookup key to free resources". > > > > Instead > > > > of again sprinkling complicated conditions and magic tricks all over the > > > > code to figure out whethe we should allow the get_validate_port to > > > > succeed > > > > or not, or the modeset to succeed or not. > > > > > > mhm, I've been experimenting with this and I think I agree this is > > > definitely > > > the right solution to go w...

...use a bunch of vcpi allocations and other payload things upstream of > > > the port might still need the port lookup key to free resources". > > > Instead > > > of again sprinkling complicated conditions and magic tricks all over the > > > code to figure out whethe we should allow the get_validate_port to > > > succeed > > > or not, or the modeset to succeed or not. > > > > mhm, I've been experimenting with this and I think I agree this is > > definitely > > the right solution to go with. It'll end up decompli...

...c_check - Check that the new state of an MST topology in an > + * atomic update is valid > + * @state: Pointer to the new &struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state > + * > + * Checks the given topology state for an atomic update to ensure that it's > + * valid. This includes checking whether there's enough bandwidth to support > + * the new VCPI allocations in the atomic update. > + * > + * Any atomic drivers supporting DP MST must make sure to call this after > + * checking the rest of their state in their > + * &drm_mode_config_funcs.atomic_check() callback. &...