search for: whenther

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "whenther".

Did you mean: wheather
2008 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] PassManager Dependence Question
...; appropriately in your scheme. Many loop passes goes through a length >> to maintain dominator info. > > No way I'm going to go through every Pass, check if it manipulates > instructions, and update the numbering info if it does. I'd rather > have > dominators check whenther numbering is up-to-date and update the > numbering > itself if it's not, on-the-fly. Well, then pass manager is not involved here at all in your scheme. - Devang
2008 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] PassManager Dependence Question
On Friday 19 September 2008 18:16, Devang Patel wrote: > > No way I'm going to go through every Pass, check if it manipulates > > instructions, and update the numbering info if it does. I'd rather > > have > > dominators check whenther numbering is up-to-date and update the > > numbering > > itself if it's not, on-the-fly. > > Well, then pass manager is not involved here at all in your scheme. But PassManager should be able to tell me whether the numbering is up-to-date if the numbering is itself an analys...
2008 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] PassManager Dependence Question
...pdate "number" > appropriately in your scheme. Many loop passes goes through a length > to maintain dominator info. No way I'm going to go through every Pass, check if it manipulates instructions, and update the numbering info if it does. I'd rather have dominators check whenther numbering is up-to-date and update the numbering itself if it's not, on-the-fly. > > I'll allow that it > > _may_ be invalidated in the current implementation > > well, I just realized that dom info is claimed as CFG pass so it is > possible that some pass is not inva...
2008 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] PassManager Dependence Question
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:38 PM, David Greene wrote: >>> So I thought about adding a pass that simply numbers Instructions, >>> have >>> DominatorTrees depend on that pass and then the dominates() question >>> can just >>> return whether one Instruction number is > the other. >>> >>> The number will get out of date as soon as
2014 Jun 18
15
[Bug 2246] New: PAM enhancements for OpenSSH server
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2246 Bug ID: 2246 Summary: PAM enhancements for OpenSSH server Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Sparc OS: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: PAM support Assignee: unassigned-bugs at