search for: wheelhous

Hi, I've been following the wiki document at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication, but I've become stuck. I'm running version 2.1.3 on NetBSD 5.2 (v2.2+ isn't available as a package yet, and compiling my own is well outside my wheelhouse). I have a couple of questions: The wiki page keeps referring to "vmail". Is this a just system user I need to create? Presumably on both Dovecot boxes? If I don't use virtual users, do I need this? Here is my dovecot -n: # 2.1.3: /usr/pkg/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: NetBS...

...elf in: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2006-December/043917.html As you can see in Gregor's example, the situation is that if I am writing Pkg A, I want to detect if Pkg B exists - if so use some functionality from there, otherwise do something else. To me this reads as being in the wheelhouse of what 'Suggests' is supposed to imply, as per the R Extensions manual. The problem here is that if PkgB is put down as 'Suggests', it is required for R CMD check to pass which seems to defeat the purpose of this exercise a bit. If one puts it as 'Enhances' one gets a...

Hi folks, *tl;dr* I'm having some trouble setting up a Windows buildbot and I'm looking for someone with LLVM-on-Windows experience to help me. *Long story* Hans Wennborg recently pointed <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141803.html>out <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141803.html>, that we're missing a 32 bit Windows buildbot and I

The verifier takes ~5% of link time when using LTO. I think we should add a `-disable-llvm-verifier` option to the LTO plugins, and change the clang driver to pass the option through in release builds. In asserts builds, the clang driver would not pass the option. This would match the way the driver passes -disable-llvm-verifier to -cc1. Everyone on board?

...code. These > turn out to be _really_ expensive. Replacing them with equivalent gotos > saves 11 million allocations (~57%) during the course of compiling > AArch64InstructionSelector.cpp.o. The cumulative number of bytes allocated > also drops by ~4GB (~36%). > (this is outside my wheelhouse, so just as an aside): Could you explain further what aspect of the change was that saved allocations? Lambdas themselves don't allocate memory (std::function of a stateful lambda may allocate memory - but I didn't see any std::function in your change, though I might've missed it), so...

Good morning, On Mon, 2023-11-20 at 13:51 +0200, Yahav Shasha wrote: > Hi > There seem to be some documentation?at the following link: > Icecast Server - XiphWiki It is a good place to look at. As well as taking a look at the FAQ: https://icecast.org/faq/ > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:47?PM <rack00terry at icloud.com> wrote: > > Hi > > Is there any documentation

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> wrote: Attached I send the spectrogram (vic SoX) of the first 20 seconds > for the wav file and the opus file. Indeed, there is extra noise > for the low frequencies, but somewhere around -100 dB. > > Jan > That might be entirely due to SoX treating it as a 16-bit file, which it is not; -100dB is almost

Hi David, Thank for very much for your reply! I got a reply on the clang mailing list in April from Dmitri: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-April/065115.html and following his advice “attaching pragmas as attributes to functions” I managed to do it, it was actually quite easy. >>Compatibility with an existing compiler is usually compelling - are the compilers you're

...i: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-April/065115.html and following his advice “attaching pragmas as attributes to functions” I managed to do it, it was actually quite easy. Oh, great - glad you got some traction! (I was just replying as sort of a last-resort, none of this is really my wheelhouse) >>Compatibility with an existing compiler is usually compelling - are the compilers you're trying to be compatible with publicly available/documented? Yes the compiler can be downloaded from here (is available for free with some restrictions compared to the paid version). https://www....

Nope, no sanitizers. On 22 May 2017 at 11:38, Daniel Sanders <daniel_l_sanders at apple.com> wrote: > Is that with -fsanitize=memory too? > > I'm currently building ToT with r303258 reverted. Once that's done I'll commit the revert and start investigating fixes. > >> On 22 May 2017, at 10:22, Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: >>

We''ve been running unicorn-3.6.2 on REE 1.8.7 2011.12 in production for quite some time and we use monit to monitor each unicorn worker. Occasionally, I''ll get a notification that a worker has timed-out and has been re-spawned. In all these cases, when I look at the rails logs, I can see the last request that the worker handled, and they all have appeared to complete