search for: wheee

...e''. Is that the problem? If so, how can I persuade Windoze NOT to stick that damned .txt tag on the end? (Gawd, but I ***hate*** Windoze!!!) If that's not the problem, can you suggest what *is* the problem? All that .Rprofile(.txt) has in it at the moment is options(prompt="Wheee! ") so that I can easily tell whether it's working. If I execute > source(".Rprofile.txt") the prompt does indeed get changed to ``Wheee! '' as it should. I would appreciate enlightenment. Ta. cheers, Rolf Turner rolf at math.unb.ca

Code changes and cleanup in the paravirt-ops queue caused the original fix for this in 2.6.21 to create conflicts. The easiest thing to do was back it out before applying the queue. In that case, this fix brings it back with the newly right properly tidied up paravirt-ops code. Wheee! Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r ecb571084874 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Fri Apr 06 12:31:06 2007 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Fri Apr 06 14:25:03 2007 -0700 @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static struct { void (*flush_tlb)(int); void (*set_initi...

Dear All, I have a working (in so far as NAs are handled correctly) version of R running on the Zaurus. The problem was not ieee 754 compliance but rather the fact that the configure script did not realise that the Z had a bigendian processor. I'll post a link, etc. tomorrow on the Zaurus forum for those who may be interested (http://www.zaurus.com/dev/board/) in downloading a copy.

Hi list! I have to do a new bare metal installation of a box running Asterisk with bristuff or vzaphfc. The box will be used as a really lightly loaded file server and pbx. Any advise on which architecture I should use? The cpu is a 64 bit capable AMD (the box is running x86_64 now) but is still suffering from echo on the BRI lines. Should I go with the normal x86 or the 64 bit x86_64

Code changes and cleanup in the paravirt-ops queue caused the original fix for this in 2.6.21 to create conflicts. The easiest thing to do was back it out before applying the queue. In that case, this fix brings it back with the newly right properly tidied up paravirt-ops code. Wheee! Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com> diff -r ecb571084874 arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Fri Apr 06 12:31:06 2007 -0700 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/vmi.c Fri Apr 06 14:25:03 2007 -0700 @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static struct { void (*flush_tlb)(int); void (*set_initi...

I installed centos 6 as a webserver. It installed mysql. However, I guess I need mysql-server for me to use it for php and my website. I installed that. I am unable to give root a password and can go no further. I have tried mysql-secure-installation and I just get stuck at errors and no progression. I have tried mysqladmin -u root password <password> and the accompanying one that

...00 0.00 syseventd PID %CPU %Mem %Disk %Net COMM 4789 0.82 0.45 0.00 0.02 vncviewer 12047 0.01 0.13 0.00 0.01 rlogin 440 8.94 45.39 0.00 0.00 Xsun 12046 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 rlogin 90 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 syseventd ^C Wheee, I can see rcp''s %Net and %Disk! (oh, and it probably died too soon before I /proc/*/psinfo pr_pctcpu''d it. Not to worry, if it missed sampling then it would be unlikely to have had huge values there anyway (especially considering pr_pctcpu''s averaging algorithm over time...

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

...0 kernel/rcu/tree.c:1074 > Lost 500 message(s)! > BUG: stack guard page was hit at 00000000cab483ba (stack is 00000000b1442365..00000000c26f9ad3) > BUG: stack guard page was hit at 00000000318ff8d8 (stack is 00000000fd87d656..0000000058100136) > ---[ end trace 4157e0bb4a65941a ]--- Wheee... recursion! Let me try and see if I can make something of that.

...ng the request for removal doesn''t make it go lower, but asking for *another* member partition to be removed (and failing in just the same way) does make it go lower. Asking for one large partition to be removed, after the first failure, caused the amount of available space to underflow! Wheee, nearly-infinite storage ;-) At least until the next reboot, that would fix the reported available space. 3. Sometimes failure is better than success. In this case, successful removal of a partition meant the filesystem would no longer allocate single block groups: it would only allocate raid0 g...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60680 Priority: medium Bug ID: 60680 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: HDMI is connected and has mode, TV says "no signal" QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: