search for: whaling

dear all, first part of log snippet is to show a bit of contrast, to me it's peculiar situation it's about messages between local users, actually one user, when I use command line mailx or anther local account to send to A_local user - ok second part is this weir error, it's selinux which prevents deliver write to /tmp, I believe thsese messages are from A_local user cron jobs(to

...t you could do this. . . the best approach would probably be to use *grep* instead of *which*, but let me show you both ways. On page 30, replace whales.v <- which(moby.word.v == *whale*) with whale_words <- c(*whale", *whales", *whale's", *whaler", *whalers", *whaling") whales.v <- which(moby.word.v %in% whale_words) the alternative (better) way to do this, with grep, looks like this whales.v <- grep(*^whal.*", moby.word.v) grep uses the regular expression ^whal.* to find all words starting (^) with *whal* followed by any number of other cha...

...the purpose of frequency count? _What_ do you want to plot? B. > On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Riaan Van Der Walt <Riaan.VanDerWalt at nwu.ac.za> wrote: > > Hallo Boris, > I've loaded the Rstem, Snowball. > But I am clueless how to get a list eg. whal* (whale, whales, whaling, whaler, whalers, whaleman, whalemen, whale-ship, whale-boat, whale's) > in the book Moby Dick and the frequency of each of the different words. > I'am usig this script: > > whales1.v <- grep("^whal.*", moby.word.v) > whales1.v > > The total occurrenc...

I am new to R. Busy with Text Analysis. Need a script to find e.g whale, whales, whale's, whaler, whalers, whaling,... in Moby Dick Riaan

Maybe I misunderstand. Each user is only able to access their mailbox from a single connection at a time. Other users can access the NFS Spool from other connections, I think that is what I am calling Concurrent connections. Is that the same definition you have? From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf Of Aki Tuomi Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 10:05 AM To: Albert

Yes, there is currently concurrent usage because the Mail spool is NFS Mounted. Here is the current configuration: dovecot -n # 2.1.15: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.54-server-2.mga3 i686 Mageia 3 base_dir = /var/run/dovecot/ disable_plaintext_auth = no lock_method = dotlock login_greeting = SpamZapper Email ready. login_log_format_elements = user=<%u> method=%m

I have, but I will be happy to review it once again. On 12/18/18 2:14 PM, admin wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH > CHS CISA CISSP: >> >> I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with >> dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have >> been experiencing high CPU use with the two

for months, we keep fighting issues with smbd (now at released 2.2.6), config is with spoolss, domain logon, and the client in question is an NT4 machine. server is a i386/linux 2.2.19 For a very long time, we thought it was related to oplocks, but now after having them disabled, it still is there. Level 3 Log is as follows: [2002/10/22 17:08:18, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(480) trans

In attempting to reactivate my IMAP communications with my Email Spool (NFS Mounted), I have gotten the following while attempting to download the Emails via POP3. Oct 18 08:00:45 ns4 dovecot: pop3-login: Login: user=<aewhale>, method=PLAIN, rip=74.109.213.194, lip=66.207.133.232 Oct 18 08:02:40 ns4 dovecot: pop3(aewhale): Error: Timeout (180s) while waiting for dotlock for transaction

dont play net cop here but since you want to try force your opinion down others throats heres one for you, if you want to try dictate to someone to bottom post to suite you how about you use proper net etiquette yourself and TRIM your posts On 12/19/18, admin <admin at awib.it> wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:26 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH > CHS CISA CISSP: >>

OK, I am attempting to use the userdb connection to facilitate per user migration to Maildir format from mbox. Here's the first user: more /home/dovecot.passwd health:$1$MCtvt/Tz$FmKqU/cbWlBhKnhc5W.Ko.:1152:1152:/home/health:userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir The configuration was set up as: userdb passwd { } I changed this to: userdb passwd-file { args = /home/dovecot.conf }

I have two servers pointing to an NFS mounted mail spool with dovecot.? Since I recently switched from using Dovecot v1.X, I have been experiencing high CPU use with the two Dovecot servers. I am not certain why they are not well behaved.? Here is the configuration information. This configuration is currently running at a load average of 17. /usr/sbin/dovecot -n # 2.1.15:

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Concurrent access is not supported. One user should access mail using one backend at a time. You can use dovecot in director mode to prevent this. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote

Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:26 -0500 schrieb Albert E. Whale, CEH CHS CISA CISSP: > I have, but I will be happy to review it once again. > > > On 12/18/18 2:14 PM, admin wrote: > > > > > > > Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 14:06 -0500 schrieb Albert E. > > Whale, CEH CHS CISA CISSP: > > > >

My girlfriend and I have been dating for two years, and she just told me she has an STI... Actually, I currently have three different models, like: Dog, Whale, Monkey They all have some similar attributes, but, they are unique enough to break into their own models. I could use STI, but I think the table would just have too many columns. Now, I wanted to let the Dog''s, Whale''s

OK. I am starting to believe that Samba 3.0.x is not stable. At least, the documentation for Samba as PDC with OpenLDAP backend (which is what I have been trying to do for four days) is crap. All the documentation for 3.0.x is mixed with 2.2.x. Most documents start as instructions for 3.0.x but put a lot of information that doesn't apply to 3.0.x, but 2.2.x. People in the mailing list

I have been using UW's IMAP server and I am converting to Dovecot for Maildir support. When a user fails authentication, or a user does not exist, it appears that the same message is used for these events. Is there a way to indicate that the user does not exist (Invalid user), and authentication Failure (Failed Password)? Clearly these two failures indicate a different error in the system.

OK, I have been running the UW-POP3 server which currently translates all login ids as lowercase (i.e. Anthony becomes anthony). Now the Dovecot server is very flexible and currently I have not found how to translate the upper case characters to lowercase. What configuration setting will translate the userids to lowercase? -- Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP Sr. Security, Network, Risk

Is there an automatic solution to this? Oct 27 08:00:48 192.168.50.5 dovecot: POP3(evelina2): mail_location: mbox: mkdir(/home/popuser_evelina2/mail) failed: Permission denied Oct 27 08:00:48 192.168.50.5 dovecot: Fatal: POP3(evelina2): Namespace initialization failed Oct 27 08:00:51 192.168.50.5 dovecot: POP3(evelina2): mail_location: mbox: mkdir(/home/popuser_evelina2/mail) failed: Permission

I've been running a mbox solution using UW's IMAP server. I've run it for years. Now do to heavy message volumes, I've decided to to take the plunge to convert to the Maildir format. I am currently testing a single user, and have successfully converted the mail messages from mbox to Maildir format, and now I am setting up the procmail tool to place the messages into the correct