search for: wgrcunha

Hello, I current using dovecot 2.0.11 and with all other 2x versions occurring the same problem. When i create the file .dovecot.sieve and compiled one .dovecot.svbin on user homedir, the imap show it like a folder, example: doveadm mailbox list -u user at domain.com .. .. *dovecot.sieve* *dovecot.svbin* .. .. I current using maildir and mail location is: *mail_location =

In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect. Em 24 de fev de 2017 4:30 PM, "Mark Moseley" <moseleymark at gmail.com> escreveu: > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: > > > >> On 24 Feb 2017, at 0.08, Mark Moseley <moseleymark at

On Fri Feb 24 2017 14:41:17 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Francisco Wagner C. Freire <wgrcunha at gmail.com> wrote: > In our experience. A ring with more of 4 servers is bad, we have sync > problems everyone. Using 4 or less works perfect. Since this contradicts Timo's recommendation not to use more than 10, it sounds to me like you either encountered a bug, or possibly it was...

Hello, We need to use doveadm commands on all accounts of a single domain, for now i need to query the database using scripts and for each one user, run doveadm. I can use iterate but, only for all server accounts, have any way to use doveadm iterate over a single domain? Thanks

Hi, We have dovecot configured with auth cache. Is there any way to remove a specific entry (not all) from this cache? -- Angel L. Mateo Mart?nez Secci?n de Telem?tica ?rea de Tecnolog?as de la Informaci?n _o) y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA) / \\ http://www.um.es/atica _(___V Tfo: 868887590 Fax: 868888337

+1 On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Hoggins! <fuckspam at wheres5.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > > Any plans on implementing the PROXY protocol to allow Dovecot being > behind a TCP proxy, and still logging the real IP address of the users ? > See : http://blog.haproxy.com/haproxy/proxy-protocol/ > > Thanks ! > >

Hello, I following the instrucions of: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions When the user receive the first mail, dovecot create the directory structure always using mode 0700, if i change the permission of the user maildir all new mails arrived get the correct umask: dovecot: lmtp(24960, *): Debug: Namespace INBOX.: Using permissions from .../maildir: mode=0770 The problem is:

Hi, I'm searching, but not found nothing about using userb with NoSQL databases: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase Are there any plans to implement this option? Thanks

Hello, I current using dovecot with mdbox and on one account i get this error: doveadm(user at domain): Panic: file mail-index-sync-ext.c: line 209 (sync_ext_reorder): assertion failed: (offset < (uint16_t)-1) doveadm(user at domain): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x3fd8a) [0x7fae684fdd8a] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x32)

Hello, I have a dovecot setup on top of NFS server, and i get this error on some accounts: Warning: fscking index file ..../cache/storage/dovecot.map.index Warning: mdbox .../mdbox/storage: rebuilding indexes Error: mdbox map.../cache/storage/dovecot.map.index corrupted: missing map extension I tried force-resync, index and cant rebuild the indexes, any idea how to repair then? Thanks Dovecot

Hello, Im getting problem on FTS on new created folders (mailboxes). How to simulate: - Enable FTS (solr on our case) - Create a new folder (mailbox) - Move some message to that mailbox - Try to search for the message contents *doveadm search -u user at domain text sometext* # Found nothing, but if i move the message to another mailbox, the search catch the message. # I tried doveadm index

I think a good try is update the new server to latest dovecot version. I migrate about 1.5M mailboxes from dovecot 1.0.X to Dovecot 2.0.X and no problems (and we have a lot of users with the "leave copy on server" option checked). http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Pete Conkin <pete at reach.net> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- From: