search for: weverything

For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anch ). Some instances of this have been e...

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is >> -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding >> standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anch >> )...

...d I think they're going to be exactly what I need. IIUC, the patches add two new LLVM instructions remark and note. These are inserted in the IL by the passes and the compiler emits them as diagnostic if the right -W flag is enabled? One question I have from the Clang patch. If I compile with -Weverything, will this enable all warnings *and* remarks? In this context, I only want to enable all remarks. In fact, I want to enable a family of remarks: the optimization remarks. There will be other modifiers to these remarks as well: 1. Report *missed* optimizations, instead of the successful ones....

...2011, at 12:08 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >>> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is >>> -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding >>> standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anc...

On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang > with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less > interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is > -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding > standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anch > ). Some instances...

I'm trying to compile hello.c with clang.exe, but I'm getting an error about missing cstdlib headers. Source: https://github.com/mcandre/mcandre/tree/master/c/hello/ Trace: C:\Users\andrew\Desktop\src\mcandre\c\hello>gmake clang -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wmost -Weverything -o hello hello.c hello.c:1:10: fatal error: 'stdio.h' file not found #include <stdio.h> ^ 1 error generated. gmake: *** [hello] Error 1 Do I need to add libs to the compile command, something like -lc? I tried a few variants, like -lc, -lstdlib, -lcstdlib, with no success....

...David Blaikie wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >>>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >>>> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is >>>> -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding >>>> standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll...

Hi everyone, I run to some confusion here and hope someone give me a answer before I implement it. I am trying to install samba2.05 on my AIX 4.3.1, but the binary file in the web site is for AIX 4.3.2. Can I still use the binary file for my installation on AIX 4.3.1 ? Thanks ! Stephen Wu Output Management Services Tel: (248)696-1413 [8-366] Fax: (248)696-1804 [8-366]

...David Blaikie wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:26 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >>>> For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang >>>> with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less >>>> interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is >>>> -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding >>>> standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll...

The context of this is performance analysis of generated code. My interest is to trace at a high-level the major decisions done by the various optimizers. For instance, when the inliner decides to inline foo into bar, or the loop unroller decides to unroll a loop N times, or the vectorizer decides to vectorize a loop body. Many of these details are usually available via -debug-only. However, this